Japanese Foreign Policy toward Northeast Asia

  • Kamiya Matake

Abstract

Observers of Japan’s foreign policy in the postwar period have generally agreed that it differs from the foreign policies of other comparable Western democracies. Few would disagree that in the second half of the twentieth century it has displayed at least three distinctive characteristics:
  1. 1.

    The dominant influence of the U.S. relations.

     
  2. 2.

    A passive, or reactive, posture, in which Japan attempts to achieve security and prosperity mainly through adapting itself to the existing international environment, based on the recognition that the international environment is basically a given framework that Japan is not capable of changing.

     
  3. 3.

    A posture of minimalism, in which Japan, while focusing predominantly on economic rather than political or military goals, attempts to remain aloof from the aspect of power politics in international relations as much as possible, to keep its level of involvement in political and strategic issues of the world as low as possible, and to avoid confrontations with other countries as much as possible.

     

Keywords

Economic Crisis Transportation Fishing Nial Stake 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    For a detailed study of Japan-China relations in the postwar period, see Tanaka Akihiko, Nit—Chu kankei 1945–1990 [Japan-China Relations 1945–1990] (Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press, 1991); Ogata Sadako, Sengo Nit-Chu, Bei-Chu kankei [Japan-China and U.S.-China Relations in the Postwar Era], trans. Soeya Yoshihide (Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press, 1992); Soeya Yoshihide, Nihon gaiko to Chugoku 1945–1912 [Japanese Diplomacy and China 1945–1972] (Tokyo: Keio Tsushin, 1995); and Takagi Seiichiro, “Nit-Chu kankei no shin-dankai” [A New Phase in Japan-China Relations], in Ajia seiji no mirai to Nippon [The Future of Asian Politics and Japan], ed. Okabe Tatsumi (Tokyo: Keiso Shobo, 1995).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yoshida Shigeru, Kaiso junen [Ten Years in Retrospect], vol.3 (Tokyo: Shinchosha, 1957; reprint, Tokyo: Chuo Koron Sha, 1998), p. 83 (page references are to reprint edition).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Maruyama Nobuo, “Nit-Chu keizai kankei” [Japan-China Economic Relations] in Chugoku o meguru kokusai kankyo [The International Environment Surrounding China] ed. Okabe Tatsumi (Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1990), p. 78.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    NHK Hoso Yoron Kenkyujo [NHK Broadcasting Poll Research Institute], ed., Zusetsu sengo yoron-shi [Postwar Opinion Polls Illustrated], 2nd edition (Tokyo: Nippon Hoso Shuppan Kyokai, 1982), p. 181.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tadokoro Masayuki, “Keizai taikoku no gaiko no genkei: 1960-nendai no Nihon gaiko” [The Prototype of Economic Power Diplomacy: Japan’s 1960s Diplomacy] in Sengo Nihon gaiko-shi [The History of Postwar Japanese Diplomacy], ed. Iokibe Makoto (Tokyo: Yuhikaku, 1999), p. 128.Google Scholar
  6. 9.
    Kamiya Fuji, Sengo-shi no naka no Nichi-Bei kankei [Japan-U.S. Relations in Postwar History] (Tokyo: Shinchosha, 1989), pp. 136–37.Google Scholar
  7. 12.
    Nakai Yoshifumi, “Chugoku no ‘kyoi’ to Nit-Chu, Bei-Chu kankei” [The Chinese “Threat” and Japan-China and U.S.-China Relations] in Chugoku wa kyoi ka [Is China a Threat?], ed. Amako Satoshi (Tokyo: Keiso Shobo, 1997), p. 109.Google Scholar
  8. 16.
    Tanaka, 1991, p. 108; Kojima Tomoyuki, “Gendai Nit-Chu kankei-ron, [Contemporary Japan-China Relations] in Koza gendai Ajia 4: Chiiki shisutemu to kokusai kankei [Lectures on Contemporary Asia 4: Regional Systems and International Relations], ed. Hirano Ken’ichiro (Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press, 1994), p. 204.Google Scholar
  9. 17.
    Research Institute for Peace and Security (RIPS), ed., Asian Security 1983 (Tokyo: RIPS, 1983), pp. 108 and 214; Tanaka 1991, p. 120; Murata Koji, “‘Kokusai kokka’ no shimei to kuno: 1980-nendai no Nihon gaiko” [The Mission and Hardships of an “International State”: Japanese Diplomacy in the 1980s] in Iokibe, 1999, p. 195.Google Scholar
  10. 21.
    Wolf Mendl, Japan’s Asia Policy: Regional Security and Global Interests (London and New York: Routledge, 1995), pp. 87–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 22.
    Kojima Tomoyuki, “Sino-Japanese Relations: A Japanese Perspective,” Asia-Pacific Review, 3:1 (Spring 1996), p. 73.Google Scholar
  12. 27.
    Midorima Sakae, Senkaku retto [The Senkaku Islands] (Naha, Okinawa: Hirugi Sha, 1984).Google Scholar
  13. 28.
    Nishimura Shingo, “Japan Must Stake Its Claim to the Senkaku Island,” By the Way 7:5 (August–September 1997): 12.Google Scholar
  14. 29.
    For a typical example of this line of argument, see Kenneth N. Waltz, “The Emerging Structure of International Politics,” International Security 18:2 (Fall 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 32.
    Osaki Yuji, “Aratana Nit-Chu kankei no kochiku: Ajia-Taiheiyo ni okeru Nit-Chu kankei” [Toward the Building of New Japan-China Relations: Japan-China Relations in the Asia-Pacific] in Nihon, Amerika, Chugoku: Kyocho e no shinario [Japan, the United States, and China: A Scenario for Their Cooperation], ed. Kokubun Ryosei (Tokyo: TBS-Britannica, 1997), pp. 180–181.Google Scholar
  16. 36.
    Byung-joon Ahn, “Japanese Policy Toward Korea,” in Japan’s Foreign Policy after the Cold War, ed. Gerald L. Curtis (Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 1993), p. 267.Google Scholar
  17. 44.
    Fujimoto Toshikazu, “Zen Tokan daitoryo ho-Nichi no igi to Nik-Kan kankei no tenbo” [The Significance of President Chun Doo Hwan’s Visit to Japan and the Prospects for Japan-ROK Relations], Kokusai mondai 287 (December 1984): 20.Google Scholar
  18. 45.
    Research Institute for Peace and Security (RIPS), ed., Asian Security 1990–91 (London: Brassey’s, 1990), pp. 137–38Google Scholar
  19. 47.
    Research Institute for Peace and Security (RIPS) ed., Asian Security 1994–95 (London: Brassey’s, 1994), p. 141.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Inoguchi Takashi and Purnendra Jain 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kamiya Matake

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations