The Symbolic Annihilation of Women by the Mass Media

  • Gaye Tuchman

Abstract

In this introduction to a larger edited volume, Tuchman surveys the substantive content of the mass media—television, newspapers, magazines—and the advertising they carry to gather support for her argument that, by largely ignoring women or portraying them in stereotypical roles of victim and/or consumer, the mass media symbolically annihilate women. Tuchman notes that most media portray women, if at all, in traditional roles: homemaker, mother, or, if they are in the paid workforce, clerical and other “pink-collar” jobs. Correspondingly, there are few, if any, depictions of strong female characters in positions of responsibility or authority, even inside the home. Similarly, women’s magazines focus on the “domestic” pursuits—marriage, child rearing, and the like—while not encouraging education, training, and other choices that tend to bring individuals into positions of power, authority, and independence. Instead, women generally are shown to be defined in terms of their relationships with men—suggesting that women are, in the end, dependent, incapable of living their own lives without male “guidance.”

Keywords

Labor Force Mass Medium Television Viewing Male Character Female Character 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bardwick, J., and S. Schumann. 1967. Portrait of American men and women in TV commercials. Psychology 4 (4): 18–23.Google Scholar
  2. Baumann, Z. 1972. Saturday children’s television: A report of television programming and advertising on Boston commercial television. Unpublished monograph.Google Scholar
  3. Bernard, J. 1973. My four revolutions: An autobiographical history of the ASA. American Journal of Sociology 78: 773–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beuf, A. 1974. Doctor, lawyer, household drudge. Journal of Communication 24 (2): 142–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowen, W., and T. Finegan. 1969. The economics of labor force participation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Busby, L. 1975. Sex-role research on the mass media. Journal of Communication 25 (4): 107–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cantor, M. 1975. Children’s television: Sex-role portrayals and employment discrimination. In The federal role in funding children’s television programming. Vol. 2. Edited by K. Mielke et al. United States Office of Education, USOE–074–8674.Google Scholar
  8. Carden, M. 1973. The new feminist movement. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Clarke, P., and V. Esposito. 1966. A study of occupational advice for women in magazines. Journalism Quarterly 43: 477–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Courtney, A., and T. Whipple. 1974. Women in TV commercials. Journal of Communications 24 (2): 110–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis, M. 1976. The Ladies’ Home Journal and Esquire: A comparison.Google Scholar
  12. Unpublished manuscript. Stanford University, Department of Sociology.Google Scholar
  13. DeFleur, M. 1964. Occupational roles as portrayed on television. Public Opinion Quarterly 28 (Spring): 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dominick, J., and G. Rauch. 1972. The image of women in network TV commercials. Journal of Broadcasting 16 (3): 259–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Downing, M. 1974. Heroine of the daytime serial. Journal of Communication 24 (2): 130–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Flora, C. 1971. The passive female: Her cooperative image by class and culture in women’s magazine fiction. Journal of Marriage and the Family 33 (August): 435–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Franzwa, H. 1974a. Working women in fact and fiction. Journal of Communication 24 (2): 104–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. ———. 1974b. Pronatalism in women’s magazine fiction. In The myth of motherhood and apple pie, edited by E. Peale and J. Senderowitz. New York: T. Y. Crowell.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 1975. Female roles in women’s magazine fiction, 1940–1970. In Women: Dependent or independent variable, edited by R. Unger and F. Denmark. New York: Psychological Dimensions.Google Scholar
  20. Frueh, T, and P. McGhee. 1975. Traditional sex role development and amount of time spent watching television. Development Psychology 11: 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gerbner, G. 1972. Violence in television drama: Trends and symbolic functions. In Media content and controls, edited by G. Comstock and E. Rubinstein. Vol. 1 of Television and social behavior. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  22. Gerbner, G., and L. Gross. 1976. Cultural indicators: The social reality of television drama. Unpublished manuscript. Annenberg School of Communications, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  23. Graves, S. 1975. How to encourage positive racial attitudes. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar
  24. Greenberg, B. 1972. Children’s reaction to TV blacks. Journalism Quarterly 49: 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Greenberg, B., G. Held, J. Wakshlag, and B. Reeves. 1976. TV character attributes, identification and children’s modeling tendencies. Paper presented at International Communication Association, Portland, Oregon.Google Scholar
  26. Grusec, J., and D. Brinker, Jr. 1972. Reinforcement for imitation as a social learning determinant with implications for sex-role development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 21: 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Guenin, Z. 1975. Women’s pages on contemporary newspapers: Missing out on contemporary content. Journalism Quarterly 52 (Spring): 66–69, 75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hatch, M., and D. Hatch. 1958. Problems of married and working women as presented by three popular working women’s magazines. Social Forces 37: 148–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Head, S. 1954. Content analysis of television drama programs. Quarterly of Film, Radio and Television 9: 175–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hirsch, P. 1978. Television as a national medium: Its cultural and political role in American society. In Handbook of urban life, edited by D. Street. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  31. Isber, C, and M. Cantor. 1975. Report of the task force on women in public broadcasting. Washington, DC: Corporation for Public Broadcasting.Google Scholar
  32. Johns-Heine, P., and H. Gerth. 1949. Values in mass periodical fiction, 1921–1940. Public Opinion Quarterly 13 (Spring): 105–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Katz, E., and P. Lazarsfeld. 1955. Personal influence. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  34. Katzman, N. 1972. Television soap operas: What’s been going on anyway? Public Opinion Quarterly 35: 200–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lasswell, H. 1948. The structure and function of communication in society. In The communication of ideas, edited by L. Bryson. New York: Harper Brothers.Google Scholar
  36. Lazarsfeld, P., and R. Merton. 1948. Mass communication, popular taste and organized social action. In The communication of ideas, edited by L. Bryson. New York: Harper Brothers.Google Scholar
  37. Leifer, A. 1975. Socialization processes in the family. Paper presented at Prix Jeunesse Seminar, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
  38. Liebert, R., J. Neale, and E. Davidson. 1973. The early window. Effects of television on children and youth. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  39. Lyle, J., and H. Hoffman. 1972. Children’s use of television and other media. In Television in day to day life: Patterns of use, edited by E. Rubinstein, G. Comstock, and J. Murphy. Vol. 4 of Television and social behavior. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  40. McCormack, T. 1975. Toward a nonsexist perspective on social and political change. In Another voice: Feminist perspectives on social life and social science, edited by M. Millman and R. M. Kanter. New York: Doubleday/Anchor.Google Scholar
  41. McNeil, J. 1975. Feminism, femininity, and the television series: A content analysis. Journal of Broadcasting 19: 259–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Miller, M., and B. Reeves. 1976. Dramatic TV content and children’s sex-role stereotypes. Journal of Broadcasting 20 (1): 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Morris, M. 1974. The public definition of a social movement: Women’s liberation. Sociology and Social Research 57: 526–543.Google Scholar
  44. Oppenheimer, V. 1970. The female labor force in the United States: Demographic and economic factors governing its growth and changing composition. Population Monograph Series No. 5. Berkeley: University of California Institute of International Studies.Google Scholar
  45. Parsons, T. 1949. Age and sex in the social structure of the United States. Essays in sociological theory. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  46. Pingree, S. 1976. The effects of nonsexist television commercials and perceptions of reality on children’s attitudes towards women. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the International Communication Association, Portland, Oregon.Google Scholar
  47. Reeves, B. 1976. The dimensional structure of children’s perception of TV characters. Ph.D. dissertation. Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.Google Scholar
  48. Rubin, L. 1976. Worlds of pain: life in the working-class family. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  49. Schudson, M. 1976. Origins of the ideal of objectivity in the professions: Studies in the history of American journalism and American law, 1830–1940. Ph.D. dissertation. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  50. Seegar, J., and P. Wheeler. 1973. World of work on TV: Ethnic and sex representation in TV drama. Journal of Broadcasting 17: 210–214.Google Scholar
  51. Silver, S. 1976. Then and now—content analysis of McCall’s magazine. Paper presented at the annual meetings of Association for Education in Journalism. College Park, Maryland.Google Scholar
  52. Silverstein, A., and R. Silverstein. 1974. The portrayal of women in television advertising. FCC Bar Journal 1:71–98.Google Scholar
  53. Sprafkin, J., and R. Liebert. 1976. Sex and sex-roles as determinants of children’s television program selections and attention. Unpublished manuscript. State University of New York at Stony Brook.Google Scholar
  54. Tedesco, N. 1974. Patterns in prime time. Journal of Communication 24 (2): 119–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tuchman, G. 1974. The TV establishment: Programming for power and profit. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  56. ———. 1976. Media values. Society (November/December): 51–54.Google Scholar
  57. Turow, J. 1974. Advising and ordering: Daytime, prime time. Journal of Communication 24 (2): 138–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vanek, J. Forthcoming. Married women and the work day: Time trends. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Van Gelder, L. 1974. Women’s pages: You can’t make news out of a silk purse. Ms (November): 112–116.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Lane Crothers and Charles Lockhart 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gaye Tuchman

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations