The Use of Space in a Gender Study of two South African Stone Age Sites

  • Lynn Wadley
Part of the Studies in Gender and Material Culture book series (SGMC)

Abstract

Archaeological literature abounds with uncritical assumptions about the gendered division of labour in the Stone Age: for example, Man-the-Hunter, Toolmaker or Artist, and Woman the Gatherer and Artist’s Model. In such gender studies there is a tendency to universalize men and women’s experiences (Handsman, 1991; Conkey, 1993). Thus, gender studies per se are not new and have not rendered any radical changes to archaeological interpretations (Hanen and Kelley, 1992; Conkey, 1993). Even placing the emphasis on women’s roles in prehistory need not alter the situation because women’s studies are not inherently feminist (Conkey, 1993), and may do women injustice by homogenizing and fossilizing their experiences.

Keywords

Clay Charcoal Hunt Excavation Haematite 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Barnard, A. (1992) Hunters and Herders of Southern Africa (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartram, L. E., E. M. Kroll and H. T. Bunn (1991) ‘Variability in Camp Structure and Bone Food Refuse Patterning at Kua San Hunter-gatherer Camps’, in E. M. Kroll and T. D. Price (eds), The Interpretation of Archaeological Spatial Patterning (New York), no. 77–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beaumont, P. B. (1978) ‘Border Cave’, unpublished MA dissertation, University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
  4. Behrens, J. (1992) ‘European Artefacts from Rose Cottage Cave’, South African Archaeological Bulletin, 47, pp. 13–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blankholm, H. P. (1991) Intrasite Spatial Analysis in Theory and Practice (Denmark).Google Scholar
  6. Botscharow, L. J. (1989) ‘Sites as Texts: An exploration of Mousterian traces’, in I. Hodder (ed.), The Meaning of Things (Cambridge), pp. 50–5.Google Scholar
  7. Brooks, A. (1984) ‘San Land-use Patterns, Past and Present: Implications for Southern African prehistory’, in M. Hall, G. Avery, D. M. Avery, M. L. Wilson and A. J. B. Humphreys (eds), Frontiers: Southern African archaeology today (Oxford), pp. 40–52.Google Scholar
  8. Brumfiel, E. M. (1991) ‘Breaking and Entering the Ecosystem: Gender, class and faction steal the show’, paper presented at the 90th Annual Meeting, American Anthropological Association (Chicago).Google Scholar
  9. Casalis, E. (1861) The Basutos, or Twenty-Three Years in South Africa (London).Google Scholar
  10. Clarke, D. (1977) ‘Spatial Information in Archaeology’, in D. Clarke (ed.), Spatial Archaeology (London).Google Scholar
  11. Conkey, M. W. (1991) ‘Contexts of Action, Contexts for Power: Material culture and gender in Magdalenian times’, in J. M. Gero and M. W. Conkey (eds), Engendering Archaeology: Women and prehistory (Oxford), pp. 57–92.Google Scholar
  12. Conkey, M. W. (1993) ‘Making the Connections: Feminist theory and archaeologies of gender’, in H. du Cros and L. Smith (eds), Women in Archaeology (Canberra), 3–15.Google Scholar
  13. Dobres, M.-A. (1988) ‘Feminist Archaeology and Inquiries into Gender Relations: Some thoughts on universals, origin stories, and alternating paradigms’, Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 7, pp. 30–44.Google Scholar
  14. Gero, J. M. (1991) ‘Genderlithics: Women’s roles in stone tool production’, in J. M. Gero and M. W. Conkey (eds), Engendering Archaeology: Women and prehistory, (Oxford), pp. 163–93.Google Scholar
  15. Gould, R. A. and J. E. Yellen (1987) ‘Man the Hunted: determinants of household spacing in desert and tropical foraging societies,’ Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 6, pp. 77–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Handsman, R. (1991) ‘Whose Art was Found at Lepinsky Vir? Gender relations and power in archaeology’, in J. Gero and M. W. Conkey (eds), Engendering Archaeology: Women and prehistory (Oxford), pp. 329–65.Google Scholar
  17. Hanen, M. and J. Kelley, (1992) ‘Gender and Archaeological Knowledge’, in L. Embree (ed.), Metaarchaeology, (Dordrecht).Google Scholar
  18. Kent, S. (1993a) ‘Sharing in an Egalitarian Kalahari Community’, Man, 28, pp. 479–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kent, S. (1993b) ‘Variability in Faunal Assemblages: The influence of hunting skill, sharing, dogs and mode of cooking on faunal remains at a sedentary Kalahari community’, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 12, pp. 323–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kent, S. and H. Vierich, H. (1989) ‘The Myth of Ecological Determinism: Anticipated mobility and site organization of space,’ in S. Kent (ed.), Farmers as Hunters: The implications of sedentism (Cambridge), pp. 97–130.Google Scholar
  21. Lee, R. B. (1979) The !Kung San: men, women and work in a foraging society (Cambridge).Google Scholar
  22. Malan, B. D. (1952) ‘The Final Phase of the Middle Stone Age in South Africa’, Proceedings of the Pan-African Congress on Prehistory, 1947 (New York), pp. 188–94.Google Scholar
  23. Marshall, L. (1976) The !Kung of Nyae Nyae (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ohel, M. J. (1977) ‘Patterned Concentrations on Living Floors at Olduvai, Beds I and II: Experimental study’, Journal of Field Archaeology, 4, pp. 423–33.Google Scholar
  25. Ohzman, S. and L. Wadley (1997) ‘A History in Paint and Stone from Rose Cottage Cave, South Africa’, Antiquity 71, pp. 386–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Parker Pearson, M. and C. Richards, (1994) ‘Ordering the World: Perceptions of architecture, space and time’, in M. Parker Pearson and C. Richards (eds), Architecture and Order: Approaches to social space (London), pp. 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Plug, I. And R. Engela, (1992) ‘The Macrofaunal Remains from Recent Excavations at Rose Cottage Cave, Orange Free State’, South African Archaeological Bulletin, 47, pp. 16–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Silberbauer, G. B. (1981) Hunter and Habitat in the Central Kalahari Desert (Cambridge).Google Scholar
  29. Simek, J. F. (1984) ‘Integrating Pattern and Context in Spatial Archaeology’, Journal of Archaeological Science, 11, pp. 405–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tilley, C. (1989) ‘Interpreting Material Culture’, in I. Hodder (ed.), The Meaning of Things (London), pp. 185–94.Google Scholar
  31. Wadley, L. (1987) Later Stone Age Hunters and Gatherers of the Southern Transvaal (Oxford).Google Scholar
  32. Wadley, L. (1989) Legacies from the Later Stone Age, South African Archaeological Society, Goodwin Series 6, pp. 42–53.Google Scholar
  33. Wadley, L. (1991) ‘Rose Cottage Cave: Background and a preliminary report on the recent excavations’, South African Archaeological Bulletin, 46, pp. 125–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wadley, L. (1992) ‘Rose Cottage Cave: The Later Stone Age levels with European and Iron Age artefacts,’ South African Archaeological Bulletin, 47, pp. 8–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Whallon, R. (1984) ‘Unconstrained Clustering for the Analysis of Spatial Distributions in Archaeology’, in H. Hietala (ed.), Intrasite Spatial Analysis in Archaeology (Cambridge), pp. 242–77.Google Scholar
  36. Wiessner, P. (1982) ‘Risk, Reciprocity and Social Influences on !Kung San Economies’, in E. R. Leacock and R. B. Lee (eds), Politics and History in Band Societies (London), pp. 61–84.Google Scholar
  37. Wylie, A. (1985) ‘The Reaction against Analogy’, Advances in archaeological Method and Theory, 8, pp. 63–111.Google Scholar
  38. Yellen, J. E. (1976) ‘Settlement Patterns of the !Kung: An archaeological perspective’, in R. B. Lee and I. DeVore (eds), Kalahari Hunter-Gatherers: Studies of the !Kung San and their neighbours (Cambridge), pp. 47–72.Google Scholar
  39. Yellen, J. E. (1977a) ‘Cultural Patterning in Faunal Remains: Evidence from the !Kung Bushmen,’ in D. Ingersoll, J. E. Yellen and W. Macdonald (eds), Experimental Archaeology (New York).Google Scholar
  40. Yellen, J. E. (1977b) Archaeological Approaches to the Present (New York).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lynn Wadley

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations