Theories of Imperialism

  • Stephen Burman

Abstract

It would take us far beyond the scope of this book to present a comprehensive survey of the theories of imperialism,1 and it is not the purpose of this chapter to investigate these theories for their own sake. However, much discussion of foreign policy is too narrow in scope because it focuses unduly on the policy-making process itself.2 While this provides information of value, it also identifies the study of foreign policy too much with the practice of it. The benefits of detail then become outweighed by the costs of lacking a broad analytical framework which can increase our understanding of the forces impinging on policymakers, forces of which they are often unaware. The theory of imperialism offers such a framework, and its application to a particular period and country can, equally, enhance its validity and help rescue it from the arid abstraction to which it is prone. Our primary focus is on the role of America in the modern world and not just its foreign policy in a conventional sense, and we will achieve a deeper understanding of that role if we begin by drawing out those aspects of the theory of imperialism that are relevant to it.

Keywords

Europe Income Defend Metaphor Monopoly 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    There are a number of such surveys available, including, T. Kemp, Theories of Imperialism, London: Dobson, 1967;Google Scholar
  2. D.K. Fieldhouse, The Theory of Capitalist Imperialism, London: Longman, 1967;Google Scholar
  3. A. Hodgart, The Economics of European Imperialism, London: Edward Arnold, 1977;Google Scholar
  4. W.J. Mommsen, Theories of Imperialism, London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1981;Google Scholar
  5. M. Wolfe (ed.), The Economic Causes of Imperialism, London: Wiley, 1972;Google Scholar
  6. M. Barratt-Brown, The Economics of Imperialism, London: Penguin, 1974;Google Scholar
  7. A. Thornton, Doctrines of Imperalism, London: Wiley, 1965;Google Scholar
  8. N. Etherington, Theories of Imperalism: War, conquest and capital, London: Croom Helm, 1984.Google Scholar
  9. 2.
    C.F. Hermann, C.W. Kegley, Jr and J.N. Rosenau (eds.), New Directions in the Study of Foreign Policy, Boston, Mass.: Unwin Hyman, 1987.Google Scholar
  10. 3.
    A. Smith, The Wealth of Nations, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976, book IV.Google Scholar
  11. 4.
    D. Ricardo, On the Principles of Political Economy, London: Dent, 1965.Google Scholar
  12. 5.
    M. Friedman, Capitalism and Freedom, Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press, 1982;Google Scholar
  13. F. Hayek, The Road to Serfdom, London: Routledge, 1944.Google Scholar
  14. 6.
    P.A. Samuelson and W.D. Nordhaus, Economics, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1989, 13th edn, pp. 901–5.Google Scholar
  15. 8.
    R.G. Lipsey, An Introduction to Positive Economics, London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1989, 7th edn, p. 380.Google Scholar
  16. 9.
    J.A. Schumpeter and P. Sweezy (eds.), Imperialism and Social Classes, Oxford: Blackwell, 1951;Google Scholar
  17. J.A. Schumpeter, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, London: Unwin, 1987, 6th edn.Google Scholar
  18. 10.
    A. Emmanuel, Unequal Exchange: A study of the imperialism of trade, London: New Left Books, 1972;Google Scholar
  19. R. Sau, Unequal Exchange, Imperialism and Development: An essay on the political economy of capitalism, London: Oxford University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  20. 12.
    D. Begg, S. Fischer and R. Dornbusch, Economics, London: McGraw-Hill, 1987, 2nd edn, pp. 161–78.Google Scholar
  21. 14.
    R.E. Robinson, J. A. Gallagher and A. Denny, Africa and the Victorians: The official mind of imperialism, London: Macmillan, 1961;Google Scholar
  22. W.R. Louis (ed.), Imperialism: The Robinson and Gallagher controversy, London: New Viewpoints, 1976.Google Scholar
  23. 15.
    The modern classic statement of the realist position is H.J. Morgenthau, Politics Among Nations: The struggle for power and peace, New York: Knopf, 1985,Google Scholar
  24. although the tradition is generally traced back to Thucydides, The History of the Peloponnesian War, New York: Galaxy Books, 1960.Google Scholar
  25. 16.
    R. Gilpin, ‘The richness of the tradition of political realism’, International Organization, 38, 2, spring 1984, p. 290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 17.
    S. Gill and D. Law, The Global Political Economy, Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1988, p. 25.Google Scholar
  27. 20.
    R. Gilpin, War and Change in World Politics, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 22.
    An alternative formulation that is particularly relevant to the United States is ‘hegemonic stability’. See M.C. Webb and S.D. Krasner, ‘Hegemonic stability theory: an empirical assessment’, Review of International Studies, 15, 2, April 1989, pp. 183–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 23.
    T. Geiger, The Future of the International System: The United States and the world political economy, Boston, Mass.: Unwin Hyman, 1988.Google Scholar
  30. 24.
    J.A. Hobson, Imperialism: A study, London: Nisbet, 1902;Google Scholar
  31. G. Arrighi, The Geometry of Imperialism: The limits of Hobson’s paradigm, London: New Left Books, 1978.Google Scholar
  32. 26.
    M. Bleaney, Underconsumption Theories: A history and critical analysis, London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1976.Google Scholar
  33. 27.
    T. Skocpol, ‘Political responses to capitalist crisis: neo-Marxist theories of the state and the case of the New Deal’, Politics and Society, 10, 1980, pp. 155–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 28.
    V.G. Kiernan, Marxism and Imperialism: Studies, London: Edward Arnold, 1974;Google Scholar
  35. CA. Barone, Marxist Thought on Imperialism: Survey and critique, London: Macmillan, 1985;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. A. Brewer, Marxist Theories of Imperialism: A critical survey, London: Routledge, 1980;Google Scholar
  37. R. Owen and R.B. Sutcliffe, Studies in the Theory of Imperialism, London: Longman, 1972.Google Scholar
  38. 29.
    R. Luxemburg, The Accumulation of Capital, London: Routledge, 1951:Google Scholar
  39. R. Luxemburg, ‘The accumulation of capital: an anti-critique’, in N. Bukharin, Imperialism and the Accumulation of Capital (ed. K. Tarbuck), London: Allen Lane, 1972.Google Scholar
  40. 30.
    V.I. Lenin, ‘Imperialism: the highest stage of capitalism’, in Selected Works, vol. 1, Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1950;Google Scholar
  41. N. Bukharin, Imperialism and the World Economy, London: Merlin, 1972;Google Scholar
  42. N. Bukharin, Imperialism and the Accumulation of Capital (ed. K. Tarbuck), London: Allen Lane, 1972.Google Scholar
  43. 35.
    On Marxism and functionalism, see G.A. Cohen, Karl Marx’s Theory of History: A defence, London: Oxford University Press, 1979;Google Scholar
  44. G.A. Cohen, ‘Marxism and functional explanation’, in J. Roemer (ed.), Analytical Marxism, London: Cambridge University Press, 1986, pp. 221–34;Google Scholar
  45. J. Elster, ‘Cohen on Marx’s theory of history’, Political Studies, 28, 1, March 1980, pp. 121–8;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. J. Elster, ‘Marxism, functionalism and game theory’, Theory and Society, 2, July 1982, pp. 453–82;Google Scholar
  47. J. Elster, Making Sense of Marx, London: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Stephen Burman 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen Burman
    • 1
  1. 1.University of SussexUK

Personalised recommendations