Skip to main content
  • 70 Accesses

Abstract

Oscar Rogers and Arthur Hunter surely subscribed to the above belief of their scientific contemporary Lord Kelvin when they published in 1919 their Numerical Method of Determining the Value of Risks for Insurance. Regarding the need for actual mortality data, they went so far as to say, ‘if a person who is called upon to give an expert judgment of the value of a risk does not have data upon which to base a rating for the special hazard involved, he is equally unable to express an expert judgment anyhow.’2 A bold statement perhaps, but Rogers and Hunter were zealous promoters of the general application of quantitative risk assessment to life insurance.

When you cannot measure [what you are describing], when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge is of a meager and unsatisfactory kind.1

Lord Kelvin

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 279.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Thomson W (Lord Kelvin). In: Bartlett’s Familiar Quotations. Boston: Little Brown, 1980; 594.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rogers OH, Hunter A. Trans Soc Actuaries 1991; 20(2): 277.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Life Insurance Fact Book: American Council of Life Insurance 1990. Washington DC; 113–14.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Murphy EA. The Logic of Medicine. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lew EA, Gajewski J (eds). Medical Risks: Trends in Mortality by Age and Time Elapsed. New York: Praeger, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Singer RB, Levinson L (eds). Medical Risks: Patterns of Mortality and Survival. Lexington, MA: Heath, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Singer RB. The conversion of mortality ratios to a numerical rating classification for life insurance underwriting. J Insur Med 1988; 20(2): 54–61.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Feinstein A. Clinical Epidemiology: the Architecture of Clinical Research. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1985; 126.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Singer RB, Kita MW. Guidelines for the evaluation of follow-up articles and preparation of mortality abstracts. J Insur Med 1991; 23(1): 21–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shepherd P, Webster AC. Selection of Risks. Chicago: Society of Actuaries, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Black K, Skipper H. Life Insurance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cummins JD et al. Risk Classification in Life Insurance. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publ, 1983.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Marx A. A life insurer’s interpretation of survival rates. Ann Life Ins Med 1967; 3: 4.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bowers NL et al. Actuarial Mathematics. Chicago: Society of Actuaries, 1986.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Jordan CW. Life Contingencies. Chicago: Society of Actuaries 1982; 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Woodman HA. Life insurance extra premiums for substandard risks. Study notes for the Society of Actuaries, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Beck JR et al. A convenient approximation of life expectancy (The ‘DEALE’). Am J Med 1982; 73: 883–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pauker SG, Kassirer JP. Decision analysis. N Engl J Med 1987; 316: 255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Woodman HA. Are all substandard risks still substandard? On the Risk 1988; 5 (1): 23–4.

    Google Scholar 

  20. McCracken BH, Davis EE. Mortality in substandard life insurance. J Insur Med 1991; 23 (1): 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Medical Impairment Study 1983. Vol 1. Boston: Society of Actuaries and Association of Life Insurance Medical Directors of America, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Brackenridge RDC. Medical Selection of Life Risks: A Comprehensive Guide to Life Expectancy for Underwriters and Clinicians, 2nd edn. New York: Nature Press, 1985; 18.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Singer RB. A method of relating life expectancy in the USA population life tables to excess mortality. J Insur Med 1992; 24 (1): 32–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kita MW. Life expectancy. J Insur Med 1992; 24 (1): 47–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2006 Michael W Kita

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kita, M.W. (2006). The Rating of Substandard Lives. In: Brackenridge, R.D.C., Croxson, R.S., MacKenzie, R. (eds) Brackenridge’s Medical Selection of Life Risks. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-56632-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-56632-7_5

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-56634-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-56632-7

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics