Advertisement

NatWest: Another Global Bank Gone Home

  • David Rogers

Abstract

Our next case is NatWest, the British bank often described as most similar to Barclays in size and strategy. Some observers have characterized both as the supertankers of British banking, alluding to the great difficulty of repositioning the large, bureaucratic and complex institutions that they have become, at a time when rapid adaptation is so necessary.

Keywords

Financial Time Senior Manager Share Price Investment Bank Private Banking 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and references

  1. 1.
    Bloomberg, Financial Markets (online).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Annual Report and Accounts, 1997, NatWest Group, pp. 5–7.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Annual Abstract of Banking Statistics, Vol. 14, 1997, British Bankers’ Association, pp. 64 and 66.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Annual Report and Accounts, 1997, NatWest Group, p. 27.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Financial Times, 16 July 1997.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lehman Brothers, UK Clearing Banks, 1998 Annual Review, pp. 76, 126.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Richard Reed, National Westminster Bank, A Short History, 1989, p. 3. National Westminster Bank plc, archived.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Financial Times, 19 April 1991.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bloomberg, Financial Markets (online).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Financial Times, 5 August 1997.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lehman Brothers, UK Clearing Banks, 1997 Annual Review, p. 123 and Bloomberg, Financial markets (online).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stephen P. Robbins, Organizational Behavior, 6th edn, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ, 1993, pp. 139–40.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Independent, 26 February 1998.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Financial Times, 5 August 1998.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lehman Brothers, UK Clearing Banks, 1997 Annual Review, p. 95, 131. See also its 1998 Annual Review.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lehman Brothers, UK Clearing Banks, 1997 Annual Review. p. 122.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Financial Times, 20 December 1995.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    The Economist, 22 March 1997, p. 94.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ibid., p. 78.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wall Street Journal, 14 March 1997.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    The Economist, 28 June 1997, p. 77.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
    Wall Street Journal, 14 March 1997.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lehman Brothers, UK Clearing Banks, 1997 Annual Review, p. 128.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lehman Brothers, UK Clearing Banks, Annual Review, 1998, p. 120.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Richard Reed, op. cit., Part 1.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ibid., p. 43.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ibid., p. 43.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    The discussion to follow draws heavily on Reed op. cit.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ibid., p. 49.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    A good summary of the Blue Arrow experience appears in Roy C. Smith, Comeback, Harvard Business School Press, Boston MA, 1993, pp. 212–14.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Financial Times, 15 October 1991.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    The Economist had a series of articles covering Blue Arrow from January 1988 through to 1992. See, in particular, its 28 January 1989 piece.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    See County NatWest Limited, County NatWest Securities Limited: Investigations under Section 432(2) of the Companies Act 1985, Report by Michael Crystal QC and David Lane Spence CA, Department of Trade and Industry, 1989Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    The Economist, 6 March 1992.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    The Economist, 23 January 1993.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    From NatWest annual reports.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    The Economist, 2 March 1991.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Financial Times, 31 January 1991.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
  42. 42.
    Financial Times, 28 January 1992.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
  44. 44.
    NatWest annual reports.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Interviews for this book.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Financial Times, 20 December 1995.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Financial Times, 23 December 1995.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Financial Times, 14 May 1993.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Institutional Investor, August 1980, pp. 80–4.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Financial Times, 16 January 1990.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    NatWest annual reports.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Financial Times, 31 March 1992.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
  54. 54.
    Financial Times, 8 June 1993.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
  56. 56.
    Financial Times, 14 May 1993.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    See, for example, Arnoldo C. Hax and Nicolas S. Majluf, ‘The Use of The Industry Attractiveness-Business Strength Matrix in Strategic Planning’, cited in William D. Guth (ed), Business Strategy and Policy: Readings and Cases, Copley Custom Publishing Group, Acton MA, 1993, pp. 323–38.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© David Rogers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Rogers

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations