Abstract
The British Empire by 1914 was extensive; by 1918 it was even larger. But this collection of territories, governed in various and contrasting ways, ranging from white colonies of settlement, now looking more like nations, to small islands with no perceptible sense of identity, and wholly dependent on Britain for their administration, was supported by three main pillars, or, if Ireland in the United Kingdom be considered, four — for, as Unionists saw it, the Irish home crises of 1886, 1893 and 1912–14 all challenged the integrity of the kingdom, which was, in the eyes of some, to jeopardise the whole empire. Even those who defended home rule did so on the grounds that, in strengthening the loyalty of Ireland to the kingdom, it would thereby strengthen the empire. The other pillars were the great subcontinent of India; the recently acquired British possessions in the continent of Africa; and the increasingly vital territories in the Middle East. These pillars were the main edifices on which the empire rested; if they were lost, then all the smaller bits and pieces would shrink to unimportance, for the empire would lose all coherence and meaning.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
J.J. Bumstead, Interpreting Canada’s Past (2 vols, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993), vol. II, ch. 17.
Sheila Lawlor, Britain and Ireland, 1914–1923 (Dublin: Gill and Macmillan, 1983), pp. 87, 94.
Deborah Lavin, From Empire to International Commonwealth: A Biography of Lionel Curtis (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995), pp. 128–30.
Bernard Porter, The Lion’s Share: A Short History of British Imperialism (London: Longman, 1984 edn), pp. 235–6.
S. R. Ashton and S. E. Stockwell (eds), BDEE, Imperial Policy and Colonial Practice, 1925–1945, part 1: Metropolitan Reorganisation, Defence International Relations, Political Change and Constitutional Reform (London: HMSO, 1996), pp. xxxi-xxxii.
D. George Boyce, Englishmen and Irish Troubles: British Public Opinion and the Making of Irish Policy, 1918–1922 (Aldershot: Gregg, 1994), pp. 135–41.
John Campbell, F. E. Smith, First Earl of Birkenhead (London: Jonathan Cape, 1983), p. 576.
Cyril Falls, ‘Ireland: Some Truths’, Nineteenth Century and After, I (January–April 1922), pp. 222–8, at pp. 225, 228.
Keith Middlemas, Tom Jones: Whitehall Diary, vol. III: Ireland, 1918–1925 (London: Oxford University Press, 1971), p. 109.
R. Curtis and R. B. MacDowell, Irish Historical Documents, 1172–1922 (London, Methuen 1977 edn), p. 322.
Lloyd George to Sir James Craig, 14 November 1921, quoted in St John Ervine, Craigavon: Ulsterman (London: Allen & Unwin, 1949), pp. 452–3.
Basil Williams, The British Empire (London, 1928), pp. 238–9.
R. F. Holland, Britain and the Commonwealth Alliance, 1918–1939 (London: Macmillan, 1981), pp. 59–60.
Porter, The Lion’s Share, p. 261; for a detailed breakdown of trade figures see Thomas Cook (ed.), The Empire in the World (London: Oxford University Press, 1937), pp. 172–3.
Martin Kitchen, The British Empire and Commonwealth: A Short History (London: Macmillan, 1996), p. 78.
L. S. Amery, My Political Life (3 vols, London, 1953–5), vol. 1: England before the Storm (London: Hutchinson, 1953), pp. 228–9.
W. K. Hancock, Survey of British Commonwealth Affairs, vol. 1: Problems of Nationality, 1918–1936 (London: Oxford University Press, 1937), p. 251.
Deirdre McMahon, Republicans and Imperialists: Anglo-Irish Relations in the 1930s (New York and London: Yale University Press, 1984), p. 1.
Deirdre McMahon, ‘“A Transient Apparition”: British Policy towards the de Valera Government, 1932–1935’, Irish Historical Studies, XXII (September 1981), pp. 331–61, at p. 331.
Angus J. Nolan, ‘Joseph Walshe and the Management of Irish Foreign Policy, 1922–1946: A Study in Diplomatic and Administrative History’ (PhD, University College Cork, 1997), p. 84.
For a discussion of this relationship see Tom Fraser, ‘Ireland and India’, in Keith Jeffrey (ed.), An Irish Empire? Aspects of Ireland and the British Empire (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1996), ch. 3
H. V. Brasted, ‘Irish Models and the Indian National Congress, 1870–1922’, South Asia, 8: 1/2 (June, December 1985), pp. 24–45.
For some contemporary observations see Sir Michael O’Dwyer, India as I Knew it, 1885–1925 (London: Constable, 1925), pp. 12–15
Mahadev Desai’s analysis of the Irish struggle for independence, and his belief that India might improve on the Irish example by using less violence (Francis G. Hutchins, India’s Revolution: Gandhi and the ‘Quit India’ Movement (Cambridge, Mass., 1973), pp. 291–2.
Reginald Coupland, The Constitutional Problem in India, part I: The Indian Problem, 1833–1935 (Oxford, 1945), p. 52.
Hansard, HC debates, 5th series, vol. 116, cols 635–40 (22 May 1919). See also Michael Woods, ‘The Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms (1919): A Reassessment’, South Asia, 1: XVII: 1 (1994), pp. 25–42.
Judith Brown, Gandhi: Prisoner of Hope (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1989), p. 167.
P. N. Pandey, The Indian Nationalist Movement, 1885–1947: Select Documents (London: Macmillan, 1979), p. 60.
Judith Brown, Modern India: The Making of an Asian Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985), p. 238.
Nicholas Mansergh (ed.), Constitutional Relations between Britain and India: The Transfer of Power, 1942–1947, vol. I: The Cripps Mission, January-April 1942 (London: HMSO, 1970), p. 14.
Mansergh (ed.), Constitutional Relations, vol. III: The Reassertion of Authority: Gandhi’s Fast and the Succession to the Viceroyalty, 21 September 1941–12 June 1953 (London, 1971), pp. 250–2.
Anita Inder Singh, The Origins of the Partition of India, 1936–1947 (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1987), p. 73.
Nicholas Mansergh, The Commonwealth and the Nations (London: Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1948), p. 17.
Francis G. Hutchins, Spontaneous Revolution: The ‘Quit India’ Movement (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1971), p. 191.
Mansergh (ed.), Constitutional Relations, vol. IV: The Bengal Famine and the New Viceroyalty, 15 June, 1943–31 August, 1944 (London, 1973), p. 259.
Mansergh (ed.), Constitutional Relations, vol. V: The Simla Conference, 1 September, 1944–28 July, 1945 (London, 1974), pp. 1–6.
Mansergh (ed.), Constitutional Relations, vol. VI: The Post-War Phase: New Moves by the Labour Government, 1 August, 1945–22 March, 1946 (London, 1976), pp. 765–6.
Mansergh (ed.), Constitutional Relations, vol. VII: The Cabinet Mission, 23 March-29 June, 1946 (London, 1977), pp. 1084–9.
Mansergh (ed.), Constitutional Relations, vol. VIII: The Interim Government,3 July-1 November, 1946 (London, 1979), pp. 348–9.
Mansergh (ed.), Constitutional Relations, vol. IX: The Fixing of a Time Limit,4 November, 1946–22 March, 1947 (London, 1980), pp. 602–9.
T. O. Lloyd, The British Empire, 1558–1983 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984) p. 324.
Nicholas Owen, ‘“More than a Transfer of Power”: Independence Day Ceremonies in India, 15 August, 1947’, Contemporary Record, 6: 3 (Winter, 1992), pp. 415–51, at pp. 421–3.
Robert Pearce (ed.), Patrick Gordon Walker: Political Diaries, 1932–1971 (London: Historians’ Press, 1991), pp. 182–3.
Ronald Hyam (ed.), BDEE, series A, vol. 2: Labour Government and the End of Empire, Part IV (London: HMSO, 1992), pp. 205–7.
Hugh Tinker (ed.), Constitutional Relations between Britain and Burma: The Struggle for Independence, vol. 1: From Military Occupation to Civil Government, 1 January, 1944 to 31 August, 1946 (London: HMSO, 1983), pp. 131, 186.
Lorna Lloyd, ‘Britain and the Transformation from Empire to Commonwealth: The Significance of the Immediate Post-war Years’, Round Table, no. 343 (1997), pp. 333–60, at pp. 337–8.
F. J. McEvoy, ‘Canada, Ireland and the Commonwealth: the Declaration of the Irish Republic, 1948–1949’, Irish Historical Studies, XXIV (November 1985), pp. 506–27.
Ronald Hyam (ed.), BDEE, series A, vol. 2: Labour Government and the End of Empire, part 1: High Policy and Administration (London: HMSO, 1992), p. lx-ix.
Hyam (ed.), BDEE, part IV, p. 161 (Cabinet Conclusions, 28 October 1948).
Ibid., pp. 203–4 (Cabinet Conclusions, 8 March 1949). For the Ireland Act and the Irish propaganda campaign see D. George Boyce, The Irish Question in British Politics, 1868–1996 (London: Macmillan, 1996), pp. 100–3.
For a survey of the policy of the various parties to the dispute see D. W. Dean, ‘Final Exit? Britain, Eire, the Commonwealth and the Repeal of the External Relations Act, 1945–1949’, JICH, 20: 3 (September 1992), pp. 391–418.
Sir Charles Jeffries, Ceylon: The Path to Independence (London: Pall Mall Press, 1962), p. 135.
Copyright information
© 1999 D. George Boyce
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Boyce, D.G. (1999). Pillars of Empire: Ireland and India, 1914–49. In: Decolonisation and the British Empire, 1775–1997. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27755-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27755-1_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-62104-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-27755-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)