Abstract
The distinctive character of foreign policy in a revolutionary state lies not just in the goals it sets and in the ideology it expresses, but in the recurrence of certain tensions within the making of foreign policy itself. It is the aim of this chapter to identify and explore these recurrent conflicts. It will be argued here that revolutionary foreign policies are, in several important respects, distinct from those of status quo powers. At the same time they are contradictory, i.e. riven by conflicting forces and rival considerations, what are termed here ‘antinomies’, that combine to produce the policy of the state in question. Neither idealistic declamation of a complete rupture nor ‘realist’ denial can do justice to these policies, which are the product of these underlying and contrary forces. The foreign policies of revolutionary states are, it is argued, constituted over the long run by six tensions, or antinomic relations.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Aléxis de Tocqueville, L’ancien régime et la Révolution (Paris: Gallimard, 1967)
Albert Sorel, L’Europe et la Révolution française (Paris: Le Plon, 1885–1902)
Pieter Geyl, Napoleon: For and Against (Harmondsworth: Peregrine, 1965)
Michel Löwy, The Politics of Combined and Uneven Development. The Theory of Permanent Revolution (London: Verso, 1981)
David Armstrong, Revolution and World Order (Oxford: OUP, 1993).
Fred Northedge, The International Political System (London: Faber & Faber, 1976) pp. 28–30.
Andrew Scott, The Revolution in Statecraft. Informal Penetration (New York: Random House, 1965).
Ryszard Kapuścinski, The Soccer War (London: Penguin, 1990) p. 110.
Jacques Godechot, La Grande Nation, second edition (Paris: Aubier Montaigne, 1983) pp. 16–17.
Richard Pipes, Russia Under the Old Regime (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1974) p. 223.
François Furet and Denis Richet, La Révolution française (Paris: Hachette, 1973) pp. 429–31.
Albert Sorel, L’Europe et la Révolution française, part 1, pp. 541-2, quoted in Isaac Deutscher, Marxism, Wars and Revolutions (London: Verso, 1984) pp. 40–1.
Raymond Aron, Peace and War (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1966) pp. 373–81).
‘The Sources of Soviet Conduct’, reprinted in George Kennan, American Diplomacy 1900–1950 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1951) pp. 103–4.
John Lewis Gaddis and Thomas Etzold (eds), Containment: Documents on American Policy and Strategy (New York: Columbia University Press, 1978) pp. 49–63.
On Kennan, see Michael Cox, ‘Requiem for a Cold War Critic: the Rise and Fall of George F. Kennan, 1946–1950’, Irish Slavonic Studies, 11 (1991), and my interview with Kennan in From Yalta to Potsdam: Conversations with Cold Warriors (London: BBC Publications, 1995).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1999 Fred Halliday
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Halliday, F. (1999). The Antinomies of Revolutionary Foreign Policy. In: Revolution and World Politics. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27702-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27702-5_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-65329-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-27702-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)