Skip to main content

Children Need but Mothers Only Want: the Power of ‘Needs Talk’ in the Constitution of Childhood

  • Chapter
Relating Intimacies

Abstract

Childhood, according to Stainton Rogers and Stainton Rogers (1992), is ‘knowledged into being’. In other words, and claims for the ‘naturalness’ of childhood notwithstanding, the temporal period bracketed off as ‘childhood’ is a social creation, whose inhabitants are marked as ‘other’ to the world of adults (Prout and James, 1990; Hockey and James, 1993; Jenks, 1996). This social creation is forged on the basis of the knowledges which surround childhood and which produce the ‘truths’ by which childhood is ‘known’ (Walkerdine, 1990; Rose, 1991; Stainton Rogers and Stainton Rogers, 1992). These knowledges, which claim to be describing a pre-existing category of ‘childhood’, can be seen as producing this category. They generate schemata of understanding through which the individuals marked as ‘children’ come to be known and understood.

Need is also a political instrument, meticulously prepared, calculated and used.

(Michel Foucault, 1979: 26)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams, P. (1983) ‘Mothering’, m/f, 8, pp. 40–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adcock, M. (1990) ‘Assessing Parenting: The Context’, in M. Adcock and R. White, (eds), Good-Enough Parenting: A Framework for Assessment (London: British Agencies for Adoption and Fostering).

    Google Scholar 

  • Adcock, M. and White, R. (eds) (1990) Good-Enough Parenting: A Framework for Assessment (London: British Agencies for Adoption and Fostering).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth, M. and Bell, S. (1974) ‘Mother-Infant Interactions and the Development of Competence’, in K. Connolly and J. Bruner (eds), The Growth of Competence (London: Academic Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth, M., Bell, S. and Stayton, D. (1971) ‘Individual Differences in Strange-situation Behaviour in One-year-olds’, in H. R. Schaffer (ed.), The Origins of Human Social Relations (London: Academic Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambert, A. M. (1994) ‘An International Perspective on Parenting: Social Change and Social Constructs’, Journal of Marriage and the Family, no. 56, pp. 529–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettelheim, B. (1987) A Good Enough Parent: The Guide to Bringing Up Your Child (London: Thames & Hudson).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, A. (1991) ‘No Woman Should Be Able to Have her Baby the Way You Would Buy a Tin of Beans’, Today, 11 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaytor, R. (1991) ‘The Virgin Mother’, Daily Mirror, 11 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chodorow, N. J. (1978) The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender (London: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, N. (1993) Rising Crime and the Dismembered Family (London: IEA Health and Welfare Unit).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, N. and Erdos, G. (1993) Families without Fatherhood (London: IEA Health and Welfare Unit).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinnerstein, D. (1976) The Mermaid and the Minotaur (New York: Harper).

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, C. (1991) ‘When Does a Gift Become a Folly?’, Daily Telegraph, 12 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenreich, B. and English, D. (1979) For Her Own Good: 150 Years of the Experts’ Advice to Women (London: Pluto).

    Google Scholar 

  • Everingham, C. (1994) Motherhood and Modernity: An Investigation into the Rational Dimension of Mothering (Buckingham: Open University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1979) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, trans. A. M. Sheridan (Harmondsworth: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980) Power/Knowledge, ed. C. Gordon, trans. C. Gordon, L. Marshall, J. Mepham and K. Soper (Hemel Hempstead: Harvester/Wheatsheaf).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1982) ‘The Subject and Power’, in H. Dreyfus and P. Rabinow (eds), Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics (Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1988) ‘Technologies of the Self’, in L. H. Martin, H. Gutman and P. H. Hutton (eds), Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault (London: Tavistock).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1990) The History of Sexuality, vol. I: An Introduction, trans. R. Hurley (London: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, S. (1991) ‘Fetal Fascinations: New Dimensions to the Medical-Scientific Construction of Fetal Personhood’, in S. Franklin, C. Lury and J. Stacey (eds), Off-Centre: Feminism and Cultural Studies (London: Harper Collins).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (1989) Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory (Cambridge: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age (Cambridge: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • Halsey, A. H. (1993) ‘Foreword’, in N. Dennis and G. Erdos (eds), Families without Fatherhood (London: IEA Health and Welfare Unit).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill-Collins, P. (1991) Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness and the Politics of Empowerment (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hockey, J. and James, A. (1993) Growing Up and Growing Old: Ageing and Dependency in the Life Course (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingleby, D. (1986) ‘Development in Social Context’, in M. Richards and P. Light (eds), Children of Social Worlds (Cambridge: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenks, C. (1996) Childhood (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, H. (1986) Hugh lolly Book of Child Care: The Complete Guide for Today’s Parents (London: Unwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, J. (1985) On Call: Political Essays (Boston, MA: South End Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, E. A. (1992) Motherhood and Representation: The Mother in Popular Culture and Melodrama (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellmer-Pringle, M. (1980) The Needs of Children (London: Hutchinson).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellmer-Pringle, M. (1987) Putting Children First: A Volume in Honour of Mia Kellmer Pringle, ed. I. Vallender and K. Fogelman (Lewes: Falmer Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, S. (1999) ‘“A real giving up of self”: Children’s Needs and Material Subjectivities in Narratives of Middle-Class Motherhood’, in K. Atkinson and S. Oerton (eds), Feminisms on Edge (Cardiff: Cardiff Academic Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, S. (2000) Mothering the Self: Mothers, Daughters, Subjectivities (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, P. (1988) Baby and Child: From Birth to Age Five (Harmondsworth: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, H. (1991) ‘The Social Construction of Motherhood: an Analysis of Childcare and Parenting Manuals’, in A. Phoenix, A. Wollett and E. Lloyd (eds), Motherhood: Meaning, Practices and Ideologies (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Milhill, C. (1991) ‘Child’s Needs Before Mother’s Desires’, Guardian, 12 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, B. (1997) As If (London: Granta).

    Google Scholar 

  • NSPCC (1989) Putting Children First (London: NSPCC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neustatter, A. and Hunt, L. (1993) ‘Young Criminals are “Sad Rather Than Bad”’, Independent, 25 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petchesky, R. (1986) Abortion and Woman’s Choice: The State, Sexuality and Reproduction (London: Verso).

    Google Scholar 

  • Phoenix, A. and Woollett, A. (1991) ‘Motherhood: Social Construction, Politics and Psychology’, in A. Phoenix, A. Woollett and E. Lloyd (eds), Motherhood: Meanings, Practices and Ideologies (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilkington, E. (1994) ‘Killing the Age of Innocence’, Guardian, 30 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prout, A. and James, A. (1990) ‘A New Paradigm for the Sociology of Childhood? Provenance, Promise and Problems’, in A. James and A. Prout (eds), Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood (London: Falmer Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1991) Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1996) ‘Identity, Genealogy, History’, in S. Hall and P. du Gay (eds), Questions of Cultural Identity (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruddick, S. (1983a) ‘Maternal Thinking’, in J. Treblicot (ed.), Mothering: Essays in Feminist Theory (Savage, MD: Rowman & Littlefield).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruddick, S. (1983b) ‘Preservative Love and Military Destruction: Some Reflections on Mothering and Peace’, in J. Treblicot (ed.), Mothering: Essays in Feminist Theory (Savage, MD: Rowman & Littlefield).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruddick, S. (1990) Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace (London: Women’s Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. (1991) ‘Michel Foucault, 1926–1984’, in J. Arac (ed.), After Foucault: Humanistic Knowledges, Postmodern Challenges (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayers, J. (1986) Sexual Contradictions: Psychology, Psychoanalysis and Feminism (London: Tavistock).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sereny, G. (1995) The Case of Mary Bell (London: Pimlico).

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, E. (1992) Child Care and the Psychology of Development, trans. A. Porcelijn (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, C. (1989) Feminism and the Power of Law (London: Routledge).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stainton Rogers, R. and Stainton Rogers, W. (1992) Stories of Childhood: Shifting Agendas of Child Concern (Hemel Hempstead: Harvester/Wheatsheaf).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanworth, M. (1987) ‘The Deconstruction of Motherhood’, in M. Stanworth (ed.), Reproductive Technologies: Gender, Motherhood and Medicine (Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Urwin, C. (1985) ‘Constructing Motherhood: the Persuasion of Normal Development’, in C. Steedman, C. Urwin and V. Walkerdine (eds), Language, Gender and Childhood (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V. (1990) Schoolgirl Fictions (London: Verso).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V. and Lucey, H. (1989) Democracy in the Kitchen: Regulating Mothers and Socialising Daughters (London: Virago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, S. (1992) Lives Together, Worlds Apart: Mothers and Daughters in Popular Culture (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Warnock, M. (1985) A Question of Life: The Warnock Report on Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weldon, F. (1989) Female Friends (London: Pan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1950a) ‘Growth and Development in Immaturity’, in D. W. Winnicott (ed.), The Family and Individual Development (London: Tavistock).

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1950b) ‘Some Thoughts on the Meaning of the Word Democracy’, in D. W. Winnicott (ed.), The Family and Individual Development (London: Tavistock).

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1964) The Child, the Family and the Outside World (Harmondsworth: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhead, M. (1990) ‘Psychology and the Cultural Construction of Children’s Needs’, in A. James and A. Prout (eds), Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood (London: Falmer Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Woollett, A. and Phoenix, A. (1991) ‘Psychological Views of Mothering’, in A. Phoenix, A. Woollett and E. Lloyd (eds), Motherhood: Meanings, Practices and Ideologies (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, A. (1996) Imagining Crime (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1999 British Sociological Association

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lawler, S. (1999). Children Need but Mothers Only Want: the Power of ‘Needs Talk’ in the Constitution of Childhood. In: Seymour, J., Bagguley, P. (eds) Relating Intimacies. Explorations in Sociology. British Sociological Association Conference Volume Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27683-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics