Skip to main content

Defining Mental Disorder

  • Chapter
Gender and Mental Health
  • 29 Accesses

Abstract

A critical analysis of the experience of mental disorder and mental health service developments presupposes an awareness of hidden assumptions in research statistics, legislation and policy statements, as these assumptions influence the definitions used to measure the nature and extent of mental disorder. One of the main problems in measuring mental disorder and, by implication, defining the population at risk is the controversial nature of the concepts of mental health and mental disorder. Because there are no objective ‘fitness’ standards, there is an overreliance on ‘illness’ standards in the measurements used. Erik Stromgren, researcher for the WHO, suggests that the task of calculating the extent of mental disorder in the population should include studies not only of people in contact with psychiatric institutions, general practitioners and other community-based health professionals, but also of people who have never sought or received help with mental health problems (Sartorius et al. 1989: 70). In other words, any measurement of the extent of mental disorder should include but not be confined to mental health service users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Editor information

Jo Campling

Copyright information

© 1999 Pauline M. Prior

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Prior, P.M. (1999). Defining Mental Disorder. In: Campling, J. (eds) Gender and Mental Health. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27671-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics