Abstract
Questions about the judicial or political activism of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) have been the subject of extensive academic and political debate in recent years. The closely related question of the extent to which the Court has made an autonomous contribution to the integration process — that is, a contribution beyond the one the member states have authorized it to make — has also animated scholarly analysis. This chapter will consider whether the increase in intensity is a product of increased judicial activism or of changes in the environment within which the Court operates. While academic analysts have begun to clarify the role played by the ECJ, a more nuanced understanding of the Court and European law is still required if the issue of judicial activism is to be addressed. Specifically, the Court (and law) need to be considered in a broader context than has been typical thus far and the relationship between structure and agency should be made the subject of explicit analysis.
Chapter PDF
References
Alter, K. (1996) ‘The European Court’s Political Power: The Emergence of an Authoritative International Court in the European Union’, West European Politics, vol. 19, pp. 458–87.
Alter, K. (1998a) ‘Explaining National Court Acceptance of European Court Jursiprudence: A Critical Evaluation of Theories of Legal Integration’, in A.-M. Slaughter, A. Stone Sweet and J. H. H. Weiler (eds), The European Courts and National Courts: Doctrine and Jurisprudence. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 227–52.
Alter, K. (1998b) ‘Who Are the “Masters of the Treaty”?: European Governments and the European Court of Justice’, International Organization, vol. 52, pp. 121–47.
Alter, K. and Meunier-Aitsahalia, S. (1994) ‘Judicial Politics in the European Community: European Integration and the Pathbreaking Cassis de Dijon Decision’, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 24, pp. 535–61.
Armstrong, K. and Bulmer, S. (1998) The Governance of the Single European Market. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Armstrong, K. and Shaw, J. (eds) (1998) ‘Integrating Law’, special edition of Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 147–54.
Barnard, C. (1995) ‘A European Litigation Strategy: The Case of the Equal Opportunities Commission’, in J. Shaw and G. More (eds), New Legal Dynamics of European Union. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 253–72.
Bellamy, R. and Castiglione, D. (eds) (1996) ‘Constitutionalism in Transformation: European and Theoretical Perspectives’, special edition of Political Studies, vol. 44, no. 3
Burley, A.-M. and Mattli, W. (1993) ‘European before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration’, International Organization, vol. 47, pp. 41–76.
Cram, L. (1993) ‘Calling the Tune without Paying the Piper? Social Policy Regulation: the Role of the Commission in European Community Social Policy’, Policy and Politics, vol. 26, pp. 135–46.
Cram, L. (1997) Policy-making in the EU: Conceptual Lenses and the Integration Process. London: Routledge.
Eleftheriadis, P. (1996) ‘Aspects of European Constitutionalism’, European Law Review, vol. 21, pp. 32–42.
Garrett, G. (1992) ‘The European Community’s Internal Market’, International Organization, vol. 46, pp. 533–600.
Garrett, G and Weingast, B. (1993) ‘Ideas, Interests and Institutions: Constructing the European Community’s Internal Market’, in J. Goldstein and R. Keohane (eds), Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions and Political Change. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 173–206.
Golub, J. (1996) ‘The Politics of Judicial Discretion: Rethinking the Interaction between National Courts and the European Court of Justice’, West European Politics, vol. 19, pp. 360–85.
Hervey, T. K. (1994) ‘Legal Issues Concerning the Barber Protocol’, in D. O’Keeffe and P. M. Twomey (eds), Legal Issues of the Maastricht Treaty. London: Chancery, pp. 329–37.
Langrish, S. (1998) ‘The Treaty of Amsterdam: Selected Highlights’, European Law Review, vol. 23, pp. 3–19.
Maher, I (1994) ‘National Courts as European Community Courts’, Legal Studies, vol. 14, pp. 226–43.
MacCormick, N. (1990) ‘Beyond the Sovereign State’, Modern Law Review, vol. 56, pp. 1–18.
MacCormick, N. (1997) ‘Democracy, Subsidiaitry, and Citizenship in the “European Commonwealth”’, Law and Philosophy, vol. 16, pp. 331–56.
Mattli, W. and Slaughter, A.-M. (1998) ‘Revisiting the European Court of Justice’, International Organization, vol. 52, pp. 177–209.
Moravcsik, A. (1995) ‘Liberal Intergovernmentalism and Integration: A Rejoinder’, Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 33, pp. 611–28.
More, G. (1995) ‘The Acquired Rights Directive: Frustrating or Facilitating Labour Market Flexibility’, in J. Shaw and G. More (eds), New Legal Dynamics of European Union. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 129–45.
Pollack, M. (1997) ‘Delegation, Agency and Agenda Setting in the EC’, International Organization, vol. 29, pp. 99–134.
Shaw, J. (1996) European Community Law, 2nd edn. London: Macmillan.
Shaw, J. (1998) ‘The Treaty of Amsterdam: Challenges of Flexibility and Legitimacy’, European Law Journal, vol. 4, pp. 63–86.
Shaw, J. and More, G. (eds), (1995) New Legal Dynamics of European Union. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Snyder, F. (1990) New Directions in European Community Law. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
Stein, E. (1981) ‘Lawyers, Judges and the Making of a Transnational Constitution’ American Journal of International Law, vol. 75, pp. 1–27.
Stubb, A. (1998) ‘The Amsterdam Treaty and Flexible Integration’, ECSA Review, vol. 9, pp. 1–5.
Weale, A. (1995) ‘Democratic Legitimacy and the Constitution of Europe’, in R. Bellamy, V. Bufacchi and D. Castiglione (eds), Democracy and Constitutonal Culture in the Union of Europe London: Lothian Foundation Press.
Weiler, J.H.H. (1991) ‘The Transformation of Europe’, Yale Law Journal, vol. 100, pp. 2403–83.
Weiler, J.H.H. (1993) ‘Journey to an Unknown Destination: A Reterospective and Prospective of the European Court of Justice in the Arena of Political Integration’ Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 31, pp. 417–46.
Weiler, J.H.H. (1994) ‘A Quiet Revolution: The European Court of Justice and its Interlocutors’, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 26, pp. 510–34.
Weiler, J.H.H. (1996) ‘European Neo-Constitutionalism — In Search of Foundations for the European Constitutional Order’, Political Studies, vol. 44, pp. 517–33.
Weiler, J.H.H. (1998) ‘Epilogue: The European Courts of Justice: Beyond ‘Beyond Doctrine; or the Legitimacy Crisis of European Constitutionalism’ in A.-M. Slaughter, A. Stone Sweet and J.H.H. Weiler (eds), The European Courts and National Courts: Doctrine and Jurisprudence. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 365–91.
Wincott, D. (1994a) ‘Human Rights, Democratization and the Role of the Court of Justice in European Integration’, Democratization, vol. 1, pp. 251–71.
Wincott, D. (1994b) ‘Is the Treaty of Maastricht an Adequate “Constitution” for the European Union?’, Public Administration, vol. 72, pp. 573–90.
Wincott, D. (1995a) ‘The Role of Law or the Rule of the Court of Justice?: An Institutional Account of Judicial Politics in the European Community’, Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 2, pp. 583–602.
Wincott, D. (1995b) ‘Political Theory, Law and European Union’, in J. Shaw and G. More (eds), New Legal Dynamics of European Union. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 293–311.
Wincott, D. (1996) ‘The Court of Justice and the European Policy Process’, in J.J. Richardson (ed.) European Union: Power and Policymaking. London: Routledge, pp. 170–84.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1999 Daniel Wincott
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wincott, D. (1999). The Court of Justice and the Legal System. In: Cram, L., Dinan, D., Nugent, N. (eds) Developments in the European Union. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27572-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27572-4_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-73633-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-27572-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)