Abstract
The economic theories reviewed in the previous chapter saw economies and economic change as being driven by great general changes in the conditions in which the economy operated. Individuals were broadly at the mercy of those grand economic forces, having very little if any choice in the economic courses they followed. As a consequence it was difficult to explain the differences between economic systems. The interplay of inevitable economic laws and similar circumstances should produce similar results, whether at the same period or over time, but clearly the reality was, and is, very different. Economic systems and economic responses are clearly not the same but widely diverse, and that diversity clearly cannot be explained within the framework of general laws. This failure of traditional economic interpretation has led to a refocusing on the individual units such as families or communities which make up the economy and on the ways in which, and the frameworks within which, they take the crucial economic decisions which go to make up the wider patterns of the economy and its operations. This has major implications for the ways in which historians see economic change, and in particular how economic change, or lack of change, are generated.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See C. Lis and H. Soly, Poverty and Capitalism in Pre-Industrial Europe (Brighton, 1982).
See, for instance, J. Lynch, The Hispanic World in Crisis and Change, 1598–1700 (Oxford, 1992), p. 176.
See P. Goubert, Beauvais et le Beauvaisis de 1600 à 1730 (Paris, 1960), p. 128.
See A. Pointrineau, Remues d’hommes: essai sur les migrations montagnardes en France aux XVII et XVIII siècles (Paris, 1983).
See, for instance, Daniel Roche’s brilliant study, Le Peuple de Paris: essai sur la culture populaire (Paris, 1981).
J. P. Gutton, Domestiques et serviteurs dans la France de l’ancien régime (Paris, 1981), p. 8.
Pointrineau, Remues d’hommes and J. K. J. Thomson, Clermont-de-Lodève, 1633–1789: Fluctuations in the Prosperity of a Languedocian Cloth-Making Town (Cambridge,1982), p. 23.
E. M. Link, The Emancipation of the Austrian Peasant, 1740–1798 (New York, 1974).
See, for instance, A. Collomp, La Maison du père: famille et village en Haute Provence aux XVII et XVIII siècles (Paris, 1983), ch. 1.
See P. J. Cain and A. G. Hopkins, British Imperialism: Innovation and Expansion, 1688–1914 (London, 1993).
I have discussed these problems in the context of the spice trade in P. J. Musgrave, The economics of uncertainty’, in D. H. Aldcroft and P L. Cottrell (eds.), Shipping, Trade and Commerce: Essays in Memory of Ralph Davis (Leicester, 1981), pp. 9–21.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1999 Peter Musgrave
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Musgrave, P. (1999). Stratagems and Spoils. In: The Early Modern European Economy. European History in Perspective. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27535-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27535-9_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-66542-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-27535-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)