Skip to main content

Stratagems and Spoils

  • Chapter
  • 34 Accesses

Part of the book series: European History in Perspective ((EUROHIP))

Abstract

The economic theories reviewed in the previous chapter saw economies and economic change as being driven by great general changes in the conditions in which the economy operated. Individuals were broadly at the mercy of those grand economic forces, having very little if any choice in the economic courses they followed. As a consequence it was difficult to explain the differences between economic systems. The interplay of inevitable economic laws and similar circumstances should produce similar results, whether at the same period or over time, but clearly the reality was, and is, very different. Economic systems and economic responses are clearly not the same but widely diverse, and that diversity clearly cannot be explained within the framework of general laws. This failure of traditional economic interpretation has led to a refocusing on the individual units such as families or communities which make up the economy and on the ways in which, and the frameworks within which, they take the crucial economic decisions which go to make up the wider patterns of the economy and its operations. This has major implications for the ways in which historians see economic change, and in particular how economic change, or lack of change, are generated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See C. Lis and H. Soly, Poverty and Capitalism in Pre-Industrial Europe (Brighton, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  2. See, for instance, J. Lynch, The Hispanic World in Crisis and Change, 1598–1700 (Oxford, 1992), p. 176.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See P. Goubert, Beauvais et le Beauvaisis de 1600 à 1730 (Paris, 1960), p. 128.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See A. Pointrineau, Remues d’hommes: essai sur les migrations montagnardes en France aux XVII et XVIII siècles (Paris, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  5. See, for instance, Daniel Roche’s brilliant study, Le Peuple de Paris: essai sur la culture populaire (Paris, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. P. Gutton, Domestiques et serviteurs dans la France de l’ancien régime (Paris, 1981), p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pointrineau, Remues d’hommes and J. K. J. Thomson, Clermont-de-Lodève, 1633–1789: Fluctuations in the Prosperity of a Languedocian Cloth-Making Town (Cambridge,1982), p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. M. Link, The Emancipation of the Austrian Peasant, 1740–1798 (New York, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  9. See, for instance, A. Collomp, La Maison du père: famille et village en Haute Provence aux XVII et XVIII siècles (Paris, 1983), ch. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See P. J. Cain and A. G. Hopkins, British Imperialism: Innovation and Expansion, 1688–1914 (London, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  11. I have discussed these problems in the context of the spice trade in P. J. Musgrave, The economics of uncertainty’, in D. H. Aldcroft and P L. Cottrell (eds.), Shipping, Trade and Commerce: Essays in Memory of Ralph Davis (Leicester, 1981), pp. 9–21.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1999 Peter Musgrave

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Musgrave, P. (1999). Stratagems and Spoils. In: The Early Modern European Economy. European History in Perspective. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27535-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27535-9_3

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-66542-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-27535-9

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics