Skip to main content
  • 105 Accesses

Abstract

Modern fantasy is inherently subversive in its violation of what we call possibility: earlier fantasy less so, because then that possibility included the supernatural, and the world was less known. In our more ‘scientific’ world, if a story shows us a carpet flying or a fairy starting out of the ground, we put them in a mental zoo: we like to look at them, but we feel they are no conceivable part of our experience. But the very size to which that fictional zoo has grown since about 1750 challenges that view: fantasy, it would appear, fills a need that is not satisfied by the prevailing realistic genres. Such fantasy now speaks to an area of mind that is the opposite of ‘rational’ or ‘conscious’ or ‘realistic’; and, being so opposed, it is at least implicitly subversive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Claude Rawson, ed., English Satire and the Satiric Tradition (Blackwell, 1984), p. viii.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Henri F. Ellenberger, The Discovery of the Unconscious: The History and Evolution of Dynamic Psychiatry (HarperCollins, 1994), pp. 83–5, 158–70, 304–18.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Repr. in Nina Auerbach and U. C. Knoepflmacher, eds, Forbidden Journeys: Fairy Tales and Fantasies by Victorian Women Writers ( Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992 ). This work makes a (strained) case for subversiveness being marked in Victorian children’s fairy-tales by women.

    Google Scholar 

  4. David Garnett, Lady into Fox and A Man in the Zoo (Hogarth Press, 1985), p. 85.

    Google Scholar 

  5. David Callard, The Case of Anna Kavan: A Biography (Peter Owen, 1992), passim

    Google Scholar 

  6. John Fowles, The Magus (Pan, 1988), pp. 105–6.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Angela Carter, ‘Notes from the Front Line’, in Micheline Wandor, ed., On Gender and Writing (Pandora, 1983 ), pp. 72–3.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Carter, The Infernal Desire Machines of Dr Hoffman ( Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1982 ), p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Josephine Saxton, The Travails of Jane Saint and Other Stories (Women’s Press, 1986), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jeanette Winterson, Sexing the Cherry (Vintage, 1996), pp. 17–18.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Robert Irwin, The Arabian Nightmare ( Sawtry, Cambs.: Dedalus, 1992 ), p. 121.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Peter Ackroyd, Hawksmoor (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1993), p. 5. See also p. 205, where in detail he likens the design of a church to that of a fiction.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1999 Colin Manlove

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Manlove, C. (1999). Subversive Fantasy. In: The Fantasy Literature of England. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27499-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics