Foreign Ministries in National and European Context
This chapter focuses on two underlying themes of this book: the increasingly contested notion that foreign ministries, embassies and diplomats are the sole or the most apt defenders of national interests abroad and the issue of whether governments and foreign affairs administrations have reacted consciously and strategically to several fundamental changes to the diplomatic agenda.1 Diplomats are wont to stress the continuity rather than the change in the diplomat’s role,2 yet they are virtually all, nevertheless, engaged in reviews and studies which underline the fact that change is the order of the day. In the Member States of the EU, there is a distinct additional context to this change. A series of unparalleled new tasks and challenges for European foreign ministries have arisen as a result of two specific foreign ministry responsibilities: the coordination of domestic ministries’ affairs for EU business and participation in the European Common Foreign and Security Policy. This chapter describes and analyzes the developments involved.
KeywordsEurope Coherence Assure Turkey Fishing
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.For an academic defence of this thesis, see G. R. Berridge, Diplomacy: Theory and Practice (London: Prentice Hall/Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1995).Google Scholar
- 4.H. Wallace, ‘Towards the European regulatory state’, Journal of European Public Policy 3:4, 1996, p. 575.Google Scholar
- 5.See S. Mazey and J. Richardson A European policy style? in S. Mazey and J. Richardson eds, Lobbying in the European Community (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993), pp. 246–57.Google Scholar
- 8.W. Wallace, Britain’s Bilateral Links Within Western Europe, (London: Royal Institute of International Affairs/Routledge, 1984).Google Scholar
- 9.See D. Spence, ‘The coordination of EU policy by Member States’ in M. Westlake ed., The Council of Ministers (London: Cartermill 1996).Google Scholar
- 14.See, in particular, C. Lequesne, Paris-Bruxelles: Comment se fait la Politique Européenne de la France (Paris: Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques, 1993).Google Scholar
- 15.See L. Metcalfe, ‘Comparing Policy Co-ordination Systems: Do the Differences Matter?’ unpublished paper to the Fifth Erenstein Colloquium 30–31 October 1987 and L. Metcalfe and E. Zapico Goni, Action or reacation? The role of national administration in European policy-making (London: Sage, 1991).Google Scholar
- 25.On the painful evolution of foreign policymaking in the EU framework with particular emphasis on the Commission’s gradual involvement in the process, see S. Nuttall, The Commission and Foreign Policy-making in G. Edwards and D. Spence The European Commission, (2nd edn) (London: Cartermill, 1997).Google Scholar
- F. Cameron, ‘Where the Commission comes in: from the Single European Act to Maastricht’, in E. Regelsberger, P. de Schoutheete, W. Wessells, Foreign Policy of the European Union, (London: Rienner, 1997).Google Scholar
- 26.The concept of actor capability is discussed in G. Sjoestadt, The External Role of the European Community (London: Saxon House, 1977).Google Scholar