The Influence of Informal Groups in Multilateral Diplomacy
Interdependence in, and the continued globalization of, the international system encourages states with shared interests to cooperate in the practice of diplomacy by pooling resources and by building institutional links and informal networks to facilitate this. Coordination and cooperation can help states to advance both individual and shared agendas through the use of collective lobbying and bargaining power. A long-held recognition in the diplomatic world of the value of collective action has combined with the growth and expansion of multilateral diplomacy, in the post-war years in particular, to promote joint action through coalitions and contact groups as means of managing complex diplomatic exercises and of ensuring that national and regional resources are used to their best effect internationally.
KeywordsEurope Coherence Turkey Resi Sonal
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- N. B. Atiyas, ‘Mediating Regional Conflicts and Negotiating Flexibility: Peace Efforts in Bosnia-Herzegovina’, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 542, November 1995.Google Scholar
- G. Berridge and A. Jennings (eds), Diplomacy at the UN (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1985).Google Scholar
- S. Chan and V. Jabri (eds), Mediation in Southern Africa (London: Macmillan, 1993).Google Scholar
- E. Duran, ‘The Contadora Approach to Peace in Central America’, The World Today 40, 1984.Google Scholar
- M. P. Karns, ‘Ad hoc Multilateral Diplomacy: the United States, the Con- tact Group and Namibia’, International Organization 41/1, 1987.Google Scholar
- J. Kaufmann, United Nations Decision Making (Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands: Sijthoff and Noordhoff, 1980).Google Scholar
- V. Rittberger, ‘Global Conference Diplomacy and International Policymaking: the Case of UN-sponsored World Conferences’, European Journal of Political Research 11, 1983.Google Scholar
- D. Scott, Ambassador in Black and White (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1981).Google Scholar
- P. Simic, ‘Dynamics of the Yugoslav Crisis’, Security Dialogue 26/2, 1995.Google Scholar
- S. Touval, ‘Multilateral Negotiation: an Analytic Approach’, Negotiation Journal 5/2, 1989.Google Scholar