Think Local, Act Global: Discourses of Environment and Local Protest

  • Joanne Jordan
  • Nigel Gilbert

Abstract

The standard appeal to ecological awareness, ‘Think global, act local’, suggests that appropriate interaction between humans and the environment at the local level will somehow follow on from acknowledgement of universal needs and principles. This chapter demonstrates how an alternative understanding, in which the supremacy of ‘local’ knowledge is affirmed, may be proposed effectively as the appropriate model for human-environment interaction. The chapter presents an analysis of the claims articulated during a year-long dispute over the siting of a hazardous waste incinerator in Derry, Northern Ireland. The analysis uses written material, primarily newspaper reports supplemented by other texts such as correspondence and pamphlets which were circulated during the course of the debate. All of this written material is examined as the principal means by which participants communicated with one another and with a wider audience whose support they were attempting to elicit.

Keywords

Combustion Chlorine Resi Arena Incineration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anonymous, private correspondence between a Derry resident and the local MP, 28 March 1991.Google Scholar
  2. Burman, E., and Parker, I. (eds), Discourse Analytic Research: Repertoires and Readings of Texts in Action (London: Routledge, 1993).Google Scholar
  3. Burningham, K., and O’Brien, M., ‘Environmental Values and Local Contexts of Action’, Sociology, vol. 28 (1994), pp. 913–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cohen, A. (ed.), Belonging (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
  5. Cohen, A. (ed.), Symbolising Boundaries (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
  6. Cooper, D., ‘The Idea of Environment’, in D. Cooper and J.H.A. Palmer (eds), The Environment in Question (London: Routledge, 1993).Google Scholar
  7. Edwards, D., and Potter, J. (eds), Discursive Psychology (London: Sage, 1992).Google Scholar
  8. Fairclough, N., Discourse and Social Change (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992).Google Scholar
  9. Foucault, M., The Archaeology of Knowledge (London: Tavistock, 1972).Google Scholar
  10. Gilbert, G. N., and Mulkay, M., Opening Pandora’s Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists’ Discourse (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
  11. Grillo, R. (ed.), Social Anthropology and the Politics of Language, Socio-logical Review Monograph no. 36 (London: Routledge, 1989).Google Scholar
  12. Holstein, J. R., and Miller, G. (eds), Reconsidering Social Constructionism: Debates in Social Problems Theory (New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 1993).Google Scholar
  13. Irwin, A., Dale, A. and Smith, D., ‘Science and Hell’s Kitchen: the Local Undestanding of Hazard Issues’, in A. Irwin and B. Wynne (eds), Mis-understanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Tech-nology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ingold, T., ‘Globes and Spheres: the Topology of Environmentalism’, in K. Milton (ed.), Environmentalism: The View from Anthropology (London: Routledge, 1993).Google Scholar
  15. MacNaughten, P., ‘Discourses of Nature: Argumentation and Power’, in Burman and Parker (eds), 1993.Google Scholar
  16. Martell, L., Ecology and Society: An Introduction (Oxford: Polity Press, 1994).Google Scholar
  17. Miller, L. J., ‘Claims-making from the Underside: Marginalisation and Social Problems Analysis’, in Holstein and Miller (eds), 1993.Google Scholar
  18. Peace, A., ‘Environmental Protest, Bureaucratic Closure: The Politics of Discourse in Rural Ireland’, in K. Milton (ed.), Environmentalism: The View from Anthropology (London: Routledge, 1993).Google Scholar
  19. Sarbin, T. R., and Kitsuse, J. I. (eds), Constructing the Social (London: Sage, 1994).Google Scholar
  20. Strathern, M., ‘The Village as an Idea: The Constructs of Village-ness in Elmdon, Essex’, in Cohen (ed.), 1982.Google Scholar
  21. Williams, G., and Popay, J., ‘Lay Knowledge and the Privilege of Experience’, in J. Gabe, D. Kellner and G. Williams (eds), Challenging Medicine (London: Routledge, 1994).Google Scholar
  22. Wynne, B., ‘Misunderstood Misunderstanding: Social Identities and Public Uptake of Science’, Public Understanding of Science, vol. 1 (1992), pp. 281–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Press Ltd 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joanne Jordan
  • Nigel Gilbert

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations