Imagining the Centre

  • Geoffrey Galt Harpham


Can a work be overread? Can it be so thoroughly picked over by generations of readers that it is replete with its own interpretations, drained of contemporary pertinence, debarred from a future? If so, one such text might be Kant’s brief essay, ‘An Answer to the Question: “What is Enlightenment?”’1 Its main claim, that people should think for themselves rather than simply accepting the doctrines they inherit and inhabit, seems so obvious today that it is difficult to imagine it as ever having been controversial, and therefore difficult to see why anyone should return to Kant for instruction on this point. Even worse, when one does return to Kant, one finds that the summons to reason is nested in other notions that have become scandalous. Crystallized in the notorious injunction to ‘argue as much as you like, but obey’, a chilling emphasis on civil order is backed up by ominous references to the ‘numerous and well disciplined armies’ that properly secure the stability of a disputatious culture. Moreover, Kant’s fawning deference to his sovereign seems a relic of a pre-democratic era, a mark of what he himself characterized as ‘immaturity’, a political and intellectual position from which we can learn nothing. In short, Kant’s essay is both contemporary to the point of banality, and immured in its own relatively unenlightened context.


False Statement Public Intellectual Critical Ethic Intellectual Work Civil Order 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Immanuel Kant, ‘An Answer to the Question: What Is Enlightenment?’ in Kant’s Political Writings, ed. Hans Reiss, trans. H. B. Nesbit (Cambridge University Press, 1991) 54–60.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Edward Said, Representations of the Intellectual (New York: Vintage, 1996).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Homi K. Bhabha, The Location of Culture (London: Routledge, 1994).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe, Hegemony and Socialist Strategy (London: Verso, 1985).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Christopher Norris, Uncritical Theory: Postmodernism, Intellectuals, and the Gulf War (London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1992).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Edward Said, Orientalism (New York: Pantheon, 1978).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Slavoj Žižek, Tarrying with the Negative: Kant, Hegel, and the Critique of Ideology (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Robert von Hallberg, Literary Intellectuals and the Dissolution of the State: Professionalism and Conformity in the GDR (University of Chicago Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Václav Havel, ‘The Hope for Europe’, New York Review of Books, 20 June 1996, 38–41.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Geoffrey Galt Harpham

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations