Advertisement

Secondary Punishments

  • David Taylor
Chapter
  • 40 Downloads
Part of the Social History in Perspective book series (SHP)

Abstract

Although the Bloody Code prescribed the death penalty for a wide variety of offences, there was never any intention of executing all those who were found guilty. However, some form of secondary punishment was required. The great novelty of eighteenth-century punishment was transportation; of the nineteenth-century, incarceration. These changes, and the emergence of the prison in particular, have given rise to considerable debate in two important areas which relate to the motives behind the introduction of change and to the impact of the reforms themselves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. 1.
    J. M. Beattie, Crime and the Courts in England, 1660–1800, Oxford University Press, 1986, p. 513.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cited in A. G. L. Shaw, Convicts and the Colonies, London, Faber & Faber, 1966, reprinted Melbourne University Press, 1981, p. 49.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Cited in L. Radzinowicz and R. Hood, The Emergence of Penal Policy in Victorian and Edwardian England, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1990, p. 475.Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    See D. Garland, Punishment and Welfare: a history of penal strategies, Aldershot, Gower, 1985.Google Scholar
  5. 8.
    See for example Bishop Butler, Sermon Preached before the Lord Mayor, 1740, cited in S. McConville, A History of English Prison Administration, vol.1: 1750–1877, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981, p. 97. See also Beattie, Crime and the Courts, chap. 10.Google Scholar
  6. 21.
    M. H. Tomlinson,’ “Not an Instrument of Punishment”: prison diet in the mid-nineteenth century’, Journal of Consumer Studies and Home Economics, vol. 2, 1978, pp. 15–26; S. McConville, English Local Prisons, 1860–1900: Next Only to Death, London, Routledge, 1995, Table 7.2, p. 318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 27.
    E. Du Cane, The Punishment and Prevention of Crime, London, Macmillan, 1885, p. 159. In practice the majority of prisoners served short sentences in local prisons and there was no chance of moving through the various stages envisaged by Du Cane.Google Scholar
  8. 33.
    Cited in W. R. Cornish et al., Crime and Law in Nineteenth Century Britain, Shannon, Irish University Press, 1978, p. 40.Google Scholar
  9. 34.
    J. A. Stack, ‘Deviance and Reformation in Early Victorian Social Policy: the Case of Parkhurst Prison, 1836–1864’, Historical Reflections, vol. 6, 1979, pp. 387–404.Google Scholar
  10. 35.
    Mary Carpenter, Reformatory Schools for the Children of the Perishing and Dangerous Classes, and for Juvenile Offenders, 1851, and Juvenile Delinquents, their condition and treatment, 1853; Jo Manton, Mary Carpenter and the children of the streets, London, Heinemann, 1976.Google Scholar
  11. 37.
    S. Humphries, Hooligans or Rebels? An Oral History of Working-class Childhood and Youth, 1889–1939, Oxford, Blackwell, 1981: Chapter 8, Reformatories, is unambiguously sub-titled ‘Resistance to Repression’. See also J. Hurt, ‘Reformatory and Industrial Schools before 1933’, History of Education, vol. 13, 1984.Google Scholar
  12. 39.
    Cited in M. J. Weiner, Reconstructing the Criminal: culture, law and policy in England, 1830–1914, Cambridge University Press, 1990, p. 285.Google Scholar
  13. 40.
    T. Jeal, Baden-Powell, London, Pimlico, 1991; M. Rosenthal, The Character Factory: Baden-Powell and the Origins of the Boy Scout Movement, London, Collins, 1986; J. Springhall, Youth, Empire and Society, London, Croom Helm, 1977, and Sure and Steadfast: A History of the Boys’ Brigade, 1885–1983, London, Collins, 1983.Google Scholar
  14. 41.
    Cited in L. Radzinowicz and R. Hood, The Emergence of Penal Policy in Victorian and Edwardian England, Oxford University Press, 1990, p. 385.Google Scholar
  15. 43.
    There is an extensive literature on gender roles but see particularly L. Davidoff and Catherine Hall, Family Fortunes: Men and Women of the English Middle Class 1780–1850, London, Hutchinson, 1987.Google Scholar
  16. 44.
    From the aims of the Association for the Improvement of Females at Newgate cited in R. P. Dobash, R. E. Dobash and S. Gutteridge, The Imprisonment of Women, Oxford, Blackwell, 1986, p. 44. This represents a marked change in attitude as there was an earlier belief that the Newgate women, ‘lost as they were in every species of depravity’, were beyond salvation.Google Scholar
  17. 45.
    L. Zedner, Women, crime and custody in Victorian England, Oxford University Press, 1994, p. 142.Google Scholar
  18. 53.
    E. Showalter, The Female Malady: Women, Madness and English Culture, 1830–1980, London, Virago, 1987.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© David Taylor 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Taylor
    • 1
  1. 1.University of HuddersfieldUK

Personalised recommendations