Advertisement

Employment Policy

  • Rodney Lowe
Chapter
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

The maintenance of a high and stable level of employment was one of the fundamental assumptions of the Beveridge Report and an objective to which all governments were positively committed after 1944. Its achievement was seen as a direct way to enhance individual welfare as well as a stimulus to all other areas of welfare policy. If the workforce were fully employed, economic growth was more likely to be achieved and revenue sufficiently buoyant to finance expanding services. Moreover, if Keynesian techniques of demand management were used, there would be a positive economic reason (the maintenance of aggregate demand) to justify increased social expenditure when it was most needed, in a depression. Economic and social policy would, in theory, be once again in harmony — rather than in direct conflict as they had been in the interwar years, when classical economic theory had required cuts in public expenditure during a depression in order to reduce costs and thereby encourage investment, and as they were to become again in the 1980s.

Notes and References

  1. 2.
    See G. C. Peden, ‘Sir Richard Hopkins and the “Keynesian Revolution” in employment policy, 1929–45’, Economic History Review, 36 (1983) 281–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 6.
    J. Tomlinson, Employment Policy (Oxford, 1987) p. 68.Google Scholar
  3. W. Beveridge, Full Employment in a Free Society (1944) pp. 261, 273.Google Scholar
  4. 10.
    S. Brittan, Steering the Economy (1971) p. 423.Google Scholar
  5. 14.
    N. Rollings, ‘British budgetary policy, 1945–54: a “Keynesian revolution?”’, Economic History Review, 41 (1988) 283–98.Google Scholar
  6. 17.
    S. Young and A. V. Lowe, Intervention in the Mixed Economy (1974) part 1.Google Scholar
  7. L. Paterson, The Autonomy of Scotland (1994) pp. 117–23 and T. Wilson, Ulster (1989) Chs 10–11.Google Scholar
  8. 18.
    Cmnd 1337. On steel, see K. Burk, The First Privatisation (1988).Google Scholar
  9. 20.
    A. Shonfield, Modern Capitalism (1965) p. 88.Google Scholar
  10. A. Ringe, ‘Economic planning: the NEDC 1961–1967’, Contemporary British History, 12 (1998) forthcoming.Google Scholar
  11. 21.
    S. Young and A. V. Lowe, Intervention in the Mixed Economy (1974) p. 28.Google Scholar
  12. R. Coopey, ‘Industrial policy’, in R. Coopey et al. (eds), The Wilson Governments, 1964–1970 (1993) pp. 102–22.Google Scholar
  13. 22.
    A. Shonfield, Modern Capitalism (1965) p. 160.Google Scholar
  14. A. A. Rogow, The Labour Government and British Industry, 1945–51 (Oxford, 1955).Google Scholar
  15. 23.
    J. Leruez, Economic Planning and Politics in Britain (Oxford, 1975) p. 280Google Scholar
  16. R. Clarke, Public Expenditure, Management and Control (1978) pp. 74–5Google Scholar
  17. 24.
    National Enterprise Board, Annual Reports and Accounts, 1978 (1979).Google Scholar
  18. 25.
    A. Shonfield, Modern Capitalism (1965) p. 94.Google Scholar
  19. 26.
    W. Beveridge, Full Employment in a Free Society (1944) p. 182.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Rodney Lowe 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rodney Lowe
    • 1
  1. 1.University of BristolUK

Personalised recommendations