Advertisement

The Historical Context

  • Rodney Lowe
Chapter
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

The empirical analysis of welfare policy, as argued in Part I, needs to be informed by competing theoretical interpretations of the nature of both the welfare state and policymaking. It also needs to be placed in historical context. It is all too tempting to consider the overall development of policy — or to judge the relative success or failure of an individual policy — in isolation and according to some internal logic. Indeed a belief in incrementalism encourages this. However, it must be recognised that welfare policy was subject to external forces to which successive governments, distracted by other problems, responded within the constraints of what was deemed to be administratively and politically possible. The purpose of this chapter is to identify these various constraints and influences. What, in particular, was the economic context in which welfare policy developed and to what demographic pressures was it subject? Who held political power and how did this affect the priority accorded to welfare policy? How did the machinery of government at a central, regional and local level adapt to the more positive welfare role which the state had assumed? How receptive was public opinion, as represented by vested interests and the electorate, to the duties as well as the rights imposed by state welfare?

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. 1.
    D. Donnison, The Politics of Poverty (1982) p. 20.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. Feinstein, National Income, Expenditure and Output of the United Kingdom (1972), table 58.Google Scholar
  3. 7.
    J. E Ermisch, The Political Economy of Demographic Change (1983) p. 45.Google Scholar
  4. P. Ely and D. Denney, Social Work in a Multi-Racial Society (Aldershot, 1987).Google Scholar
  5. 8.
    In the early 1960s the trade unions insisted on the retention of clause 4 either in response to their increasingly militant members or, purely defensively, to retain the historical link between the various factions of the Labour movement. See V. Bogdanor, ‘The Labour party in opposition, 1951–1964’, in V. Bogdanor and R. Skidelsky (eds), The Age of Affluence, 1951–64 (1970).Google Scholar
  6. 10.
    K. Morgan, Labour in Power, 1945–1951 (1984) p. 186. For the most sympathetic account of the Wilson governments, see B. Pimlott, Harold Wilson (1992). Google Scholar
  7. 11.
    T. Utley, Not Guilty (1957) p. 156.Google Scholar
  8. H. Jones, ‘New tricks for an old dog? The Conservatives’ social policy, 1951–5’, in A. Gorst et al. (eds), Contemporary British History, 1931–1961 (1991).Google Scholar
  9. 14.
    D. Kavanagh, ‘The Heath Government, 1970–1974’, in P. Hennessy and A. Seldon (eds), Ruling Performance (Oxford, 1987) p. 234.Google Scholar
  10. S. Ball and A. Seldon (eds), The Heath Government, 1970–1974: a reappraisal (1996), which includes a chapter on the planning and implementation of social policy.Google Scholar
  11. 16.
    C. A. R. Crosland, The Conservative Enemy (1962) p. 123;Google Scholar
  12. R. Lowe, ‘The Second World War, consensus and the foundation of the Welfare State’, Twentieth Century British History, 1 (1990) 152–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 17.
    G. K. Fry, Reforming the Civil Service: the Fulton Committee on the British Home Civil Service, 1966–1968 (Edinburgh, 1993).Google Scholar
  14. 18.
    D. Marquand, The Unprincipled Society (1988) p. 26;Google Scholar
  15. A. Booth, ’“The Keynesian revolution” in economic policy making’, Economic History Review, 36 (1983) 118;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. P. Hennessy, Whitehall (1989) p. 235.Google Scholar
  17. 19.
    P. Hennessy, Whitehall (1989) pp. 88 and 135.Google Scholar
  18. 21.
    A major failure of the British Treasury was the refusal to discuss the constructive relationship between social and economic policy and the social consequences of taxation when the opportunity arose between 1955 and 1957. See R. Lowe, ‘Resignation at the Treasury’, Journal of Social Policy, 18 (1989) 520–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 22.
    K. Newton and T. Karran, The Politics of Local Expenditure (1985) p. 52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. R. Jackman, ‘Local government finance’, in M. Loughlin et al. (eds), Half a Century of Municipal Decline (1985) Ch. 7.Google Scholar
  21. 23.
    A. G. Geen, ‘Educational policy-making in Cardiff, 1944–70’, Public Administration, 59 (1981) 85–104;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. M. Kogan (ed.), The Politics of Education (1971) p. 48.Google Scholar
  23. 29.
    D. Birrell and A. Murie, ‘Ideology, conflict and social policy’, Journal of Social Policy, 4 (1975) 251;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. J. Ditch, Social Policy in Northern Ireland between 1939–1950 (Avebury, 1988) p. xi.Google Scholar
  25. 30.
    J. G. Kellas, The Scottish Political System (Cambridge, 1975) p. 308.Google Scholar
  26. 31.
    I. Levitt, ‘The origins of the Scottish Development Bond’, Scottish Affairs 14 (1996) 55;Google Scholar
  27. L. Paterson, The Autonomy of Scotland (Edinburgh, 1994) p. 130.Google Scholar
  28. J. Murphy, British Social Services: the Scottish dimension (Edinburgh, 1992).Google Scholar
  29. 32.
    A. Gibb, ‘Policy and politics in Scottish housing since 1945’, in R. Rodger (ed.), Scottish Housing in the Twentieth Century (Leicester, 1989) p. 167.Google Scholar
  30. 34.
    R. M. Titmuss, Problems of Social Policy (1950) p. 434.Google Scholar
  31. 35.
    P. Addison, The Road to 1945 (1975) p. 15.Google Scholar
  32. 37.
    D. E. Butler and A. King, The British General Election of 1964 (1965) Chs 4–5.Google Scholar
  33. 38.
    D. Butler and D. Stokes, Political Change in Britain (1974) p. 297.Google Scholar
  34. 42.
    M. Pinto-Duschinsky, ‘Bread and circuses? The Conservatives in office, 1951–1964’, in V. Bogdanor and R. Skidelsky (eds), The Age of Affluence (1970) p. 77.Google Scholar
  35. 43.
    R. Lowe, ‘The Second World War, consensus and the foundation of the Welfare State’, Twentieth Century British History, 1 (1990) 178–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 46.
    D. Marquand, The Unprincipled Society (1988) p. 224.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Rodney Lowe 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rodney Lowe
    • 1
  1. 1.University of BristolUK

Personalised recommendations