Advertisement

The Nature of Policymaking

  • Rodney Lowe
Chapter
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

The historical analysis of the welfare state benefits from theoretical insights into the distribution of power in society and the ultimate objectives of state intervention. It can also benefit from similar insights into the formulation of policy and the criteria for its effectiveness. This requires a change of focus from the general theories to the more technical aspects of political science and economics which are concerned with how political decisions are taken and implemented, and how policy objectives (once determined) can best be achieved. For instance, does state intervention — as its early proponents (such as Keynes and Beveridge) seemed to assume but as its opponents (the New Right) would dispute — really entail the taking of decisions by disinterested experts in command of the full range of relevant information? Are these decisions then automatically implemented in such a way that all citizens benefit, and only benefit, from them in the manner intended? Similarly, in a specific policy area, what are the criteria for determining whether the use of scarce resources will be maximised, in general, by state intervention or the market and, in particular, by a given policy? Such theoretical questions as these have spawned a vast empirical literature, from which examples will again be largely selected from the history of the NHS.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. 1.
    Cmd 9663 (1956) para. 733 (2); C. Webster, The National Health Service since the War, vol. 1 (1988) pp. 220–2;Google Scholar
  2. M. J. Smith et al., ‘Central government departments’, in R. A. W. Rhodes and R Dunleavy (eds), Prime Minister, Cabinet and Core Executive (1995) p. 50.Google Scholar
  3. 2.
    R. Harris and A. Seldon, Choice in Welfare (1965) p. 58.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. Roth and C. Willich, Max Weber: economy and society, vol. 3 (New York, 1968) pp. 983–5.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    T. E. Borcheding, Budgets and Bureaucrats (North Columbia, 1977) p. 61;Google Scholar
  6. W. A. Niskanen, Bureaucracy: servant or master? (1973) p. 23.Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    Cmnd 3638 (1968); R. H. S. Crossman, The Diaries of a Cabinet Minister vols 1–3 (1975–7).Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    B. Castle, The Castle Diaries, 1974–6 (1980) p. 170;Google Scholar
  9. R. H. S. Crossman, The Diaries of a Cabinet Minister, vol. 1 (1975) pp. 21–39, 614–28;Google Scholar
  10. R. Lowe, ‘Milestone or millstone? The 1959–61 Plowden Committee and its impact on British welfare policy’, Historical Journal, 40 (1997) 463–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 10.
    B. Castle, The Castle Diaries, 1974–6 (1980) p. 209.Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    M. Kogan, The Politics of Education (1971). The ministers were Boyle (1962–4) and Crosland (1965–7).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. A. W. Rhodes, Understanding Governance (1997).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    See R. Lowe, ‘Bureaucracy triumphant or denied? The expansion of the British civil service’, Public Administration, 62 (1984) 291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 16.
    M. Hill, The Sociology of Public Administration (1972) Ch. 4.Google Scholar
  16. 17.
    K. Mannheim, Freedom, Power and Democratic Planning (1951) p. xvii.Google Scholar
  17. 19.
    S. Charles and A. Webb, The Economic Approach to Social Policy (1986) p. 66.Google Scholar
  18. 20.
    See S. Gorovitz, ‘John Rawls: a theory of justice’ in A. de Crespigny and K. R. Minogue (eds), Contemporary Political Philosophers (1975) pp. 272–89. For Rawls’ importance to the refinement of social democracy, see above, Chapter 2, note 20.Google Scholar
  19. 21.
    Sir A. Cairncross, Essays in Economic Management (1971) p. 63.Google Scholar
  20. 22.
    N. Barr, The Economics of the Welfare State (Oxford, 1993) p. 433.Google Scholar
  21. 24.
    J. Le Grand, C. Propper and R. Robinson, The Economics of Social Problems (1992) p. 61.Google Scholar
  22. J. Le Grand and W. Bartlett (eds), Quasi-Markets and Social Policy (1993).Google Scholar
  23. 25.
    See A. Maynard and A. Ladbrook, ‘Budget allocation in the NHS’, Journal of Social Policy, 9 (1980) 289–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Rodney Lowe 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rodney Lowe
    • 1
  1. 1.University of BristolUK

Personalised recommendations