Abstract
Comparative and Third-World studies have undergone significant paradigmatic changes in recent years, ranging from the ideologically laden poles of the dependency and modernisation approaches of the 1970s to the somewhat more neutral neo-statist perspective of the 1980s. Concurrent with this shift in analytical focus has been a zealous rediscovery of culture and its relevance, to political analysis.1 Out of this intellectually enriching odyssey, and in fact as a synthesis of many of the previous paradigms, has grown a perspective best described as the ‘state-in-society’ paradigm.2 Building such a perspective, this study presents a slightly modified methodology for conceptualising Third-World politics. More specifically, the arguments here seek to sharpen the approach’s focus by pointing to several areas of analysis that the main proponents of the perspective have either completely ignored or have under-emphasised.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
See S. Huntington, ‘The Goals of Development’, in M. Weiner and S. Huntington (eds), Understanding Political Development (New York: HarperCollins, 1987), pp. 3–32.
J. Migdal, A. Kohli and V. Shue (eds), State Power and Social Forces: Domination and Transformation in the Third World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), p. 1.
See, for example, J. Manor (ed.), Rethinking Third World Politics (London: Longman, 1991).
J. Migdal, Strong Societies and Weak States: State-Society Relations and State Capabilities in the Third World (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988), pp. 28–9.
J. Dearlove, ‘Bringing the Constitution Back In: Political Science and the State’, Political Science vol. 37 (1989), p. 251.
T. Skocpol, ‘Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Analysis’, in P. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer and T. Skocpol (eds), Bringing the State Back In (Cambridge University Press, 1985), pp. 3–37.
A. Giddens, Capitalism and Modern Social Theory: An Analysis of the Writings of Marx, Durkheim and Max Weber (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), p. 156.
See, for example, G. Almond and G Bingham Powell, ‘The Study of Comparative Politics’, in G. Almond and G. Bingham Powell (eds), Comparative Politics Today: A World View, 5th edn (New York: HarperCollins, 1992), pp. 4–6.
S. White, J. Gardner and G. Schopflin, Communist Political Systems, 2nd edn (New York: St Martin’s Press, 1987), p. 20.
B. Guy Peters, European Politics Reconsidered (New York: Holmes & Meier, 1991), pp. 171–2.
G. Loewenberg and S. Patterson, ‘Legislatures and Political Systems’, in L. Cantori and A. Ziegler (eds), Comparative Politics in the Post-Behavioral Era (Boulder, Col.: Lynne Rienner, 1988), p. 280.
S. Huntington, Political Order in Changing Societies (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1968), p. 196.
I. Harik, ‘The Origins of the Arab State System’, in G. Salame (ed.), The Foundations of the Arab State System (London: Croom Helm, 1987), p. 24.
M. Kamrava and F. Mora, ‘Civil Society in Comparative Perspective: Lessons from Latin America and the Middle East’, Paper delivered in Conference on Democratisation and Civil Society, University of Warwick, UK, 15–16 February 1996.
G. Almond and S. Verba, The Civic Culture (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1963).
E. Vogel, The Four Little Dragons (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1991), pp. 92–3.
J. Bill and R. Springborg, Politics in the Middle East, 4th edn (New York: HarperCollins, 1994), pp. 160–2.
H. Sharabi, Neopatriarchy: A Theory of Distorted Change in the Arab World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988), p. 9.
J.-F. Bayart, The State in Africa: The Politics of the Belly (London: Longman, 1993), pp. 174–5.
S. E. Finer, The Man on Horseback The Role of the Military in Politics (Boulder, Col.: Westview, 1988), pp. 214–5.
See D. Rueschemeyer, E. H. Stephens and J. Stephens, Capitalist Development and Democracy (Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press, 1992), p. 269.
B. Moore, The Social Origins of Democracy and Dictatorship: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World (New York: Penguin, 1966), p. 415.
For a discussion of the nature of and relationship between corporatism and Fascism in inter-war Europe, see H. R. Kedward, Fascism in Western Europe 1900–45 (New York University Press, 1971), pp. 207–19.
K. Layboum, The Evolution of British Social Policy and the Welfare State (Keele University Press, 1995), p. 222.
G. O’Donnell, Bureaucratic Authoritarianism: Argentina, 1966–1973, in Comparative Perspective (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1988), p. 32.
M. Foley, ‘Debt, Democracy, and Neoliberalism in Latin America: Losses and Gains of the “Lost Decade” in M. Dorraj (ed.), The Changing Political Economy of the Third World, (Boulder, Col.: Lynne Rienner, 1995), p. 20.
L. C. Bresser Pereira, J.-M. Maravall and A. Przewoski, Economic Reform in New Democracies: A Social-Democratic Approach (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), pp. 132–3.
M. Todaro, Economic Development in the Third World, 4th edn (New York: Longman, 1989), pp. 20–1.
H. Wiarda, Latin American Politics, (Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, 1995), pp. 112–16.
C. Geertz, H. Geertz and L. Rosen, Meaning and Order in Moroccan Society: Three Essays in Cultural Analysis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979), pp. 123–264.
C. Young, ‘Patterns of Social Conflict: State, Class, and Ethnicity’, Daedlus, vol. 111, no. 2, Spring (1982), p. 86.
See A. Gadzey, ‘The Political Economy of Centralization and Delayed Capitalism in Sub-Saharan Africa’, in M. Dorraj (ed.), The Changing Political Economy of the Third World p. 89.
With the exception of South Africa. See S. Lewis, The Economics of Apartheid (New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press, 1990), pp. 17–18.
S. Hawking, A Brief History of Time: From the Big Bang to Black Holes (London: Bantam, 1988), pp. 55–6.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1998 Macmillan Press Ltd
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kamrava, M. (1998). Modifications to the State-in-Society Approach: A Sharper Focus. In: Poku, N., Pettiford, L. (eds) Redefining the Third World. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26966-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26966-2_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-26968-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-26966-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)