Skip to main content

Part of the book series: St Antony’s Series ((STANTS))

  • 76 Accesses

Abstract

In capitalist market economies, the share in GDP of government spending increased sharply between 1890 and 1990, in the latter year averaging 43 per cent in the OECD countries and nearly 49 per cent in the European Community. An important cause of the growth of government spending has been the expansion of the welfare state financed through taxation, which has taken place especially since the end of the Second World War.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Welfare pluralism was discussed by Norman Johnson, The Welfare State in Transition: The Theory and Practice of Welfare Pluralism, Brighton, Wheatsheaf Books, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rose, ‘Common Goals but Different Roles: The State’s Contribution to the Welfare Mix’, in Richard Rose and Rei Shiratori (eds), The Welfare State East and West, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1986, Chapter 1.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alessandro Cigno, Economics of the Family, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1991, pp. 41–2.

    Google Scholar 

  4. On welfare as one of the ends of the state see Charles E. Merriam, Systematic Politics, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1946 (second impression), pp. 50–4 and 297.

    Google Scholar 

  5. On the general-welfare functions of the state see R.M. Mclver, The Web of Government, New York, Macmillan, 1947 (second printing), pp. 331–40.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A distinction between the needs model and the [social] insurance model was made by Brian Barry, ‘The Continuing Relevance of Socialism’, in Robert Skidelsky (ed.), Thatcherism, London, Chatto & Windus, 1988, Chapter 8.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Some other typologies of welfare state regimes were summarized by Christopher Pierson, Beyond the Welfare State? The New Political Economy of Welfare, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1991, pp. 184–7.

    Google Scholar 

  8. On differences in the state provision of welfare among industrial countries see e.g. PR. Kaim-Caudle, Comparative Social Policy and Social Security, London, Martin Robertson, 1973, and

    Google Scholar 

  9. Margaret S. Gordon, Social Security Policies in Industrial Countries, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  10. An overview of social security benefits available in the United Kingdom by the end of the 1980s is to be found in Thomas and Dorothy Wilson (eds), The State and Social Welfare, London, Longman, 1991, Appendix. These benefits fell into three groups, namely, (1) national insurance benefits; (2) non-contributory, non-means-tested benefits; and (3) means-tested benefits.

    Google Scholar 

  11. The question of welfare rights is discussed by Norman Barry, Welfare, Milton Keynes, Open University Press, 1994 (reprinted), pp. 78–85.

    Google Scholar 

  12. John Peet, ‘Health Care’, The Economist, 6 July 1991, Survey

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nicholas Barr, The Economics of the Welfare State, London, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1993 (second edition), pp. 305–9

    Google Scholar 

  14. Anatole Kaletsky, ‘The National Health Service can Survive as it is, Thank You’, The Times, 21 September 1995, p. 27

    Google Scholar 

  15. Milton Friedman, Capitalism and Freedom, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1982 (reissued), pp. 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Howard Glennerster, ‘Social Policy since the Second World War’, in Nicholas Barr et al., The State of Welfare, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1990, p. 21, Fig. 2.1.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Howard Glennerster, op. cit., p. 22, Table 2.2, and Edwin Bell, ‘Social Policy and Economic Reality’, The OECD Observer, no. 183 (August/September 1993), pp. 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  18. John Creedy and Richard Disney, ‘Can We Afford to Grow Older?’ European Economic Review, vol. 33, nos. 2–3 (March 1989), pp. 367–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. See also Barbara Beck, ‘The Economics of Ageing’, The Economist, 27 January 1996, Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  20. See e.g. Helmut Reisen, ‘On the Weath of Nations and Retirees’, in Richard O’Brien (ed.), Finance and the International Economy: 8, Oxford University Press, 1994, Chapter 5.

    Google Scholar 

  21. OECD, Future Global Capital Shortages: Real Threat or Pure Fiction? Paris, OECD, 1996, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  22. A criticism of the British welfare state is to be found in Paul Einzig, Decline and Fall? Britain’s Crisis in the Sixties. London, Macmillan, 1969, Chapter 10.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Theodore Geiger, Welfare and Efficiency, London, Macmillan, 1979, pp. 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  24. As to Britain between 1983 and 1993 see David Lipsey, ‘Do We Really Want More Public Spending?’, in Roger Jowell et al. (eds), British Social Attitudes: the 11th report, Aldershot, Dartmouth Publishing Company, 1994, Chapter 1.

    Google Scholar 

  25. See also the results of an opinion poll conducted by MORI in June 1988, as presented by Ivor Crewe, ‘Values: The Crusade that Failed’, in Dennis Kavanagh and Anthony Seldon (eds), The Thatcher Effect, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1989, pp. 241–3

    Google Scholar 

  26. On the relationship between welfare statism and international competitiveness see Alfred Pfaller et al., ‘The Issue’, in Alfred Pfaller, Ian Gough, and Goran Therborn (eds), Can the Welfare State Competei, Basingstoke, Macmillan, 1991, Chapter 1.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. On a voucher plan for elementary and secondary schooling and for higher education see Milton and Rose Friedman, Free to Choose, London, Seeker & Warburg, 1980, pp. 158–75 and 185–7.

    Google Scholar 

  28. OECD, Progress in Structural Reform: Supplement to OECD Economic Outlook 47, Paris, 1990, p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Some problematic aspects and contradictions of the welfare state are discussed by Anthony Giddens, Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1994, pp. 17–18, 74–7 and 134–50.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1998 J. L. Porket

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Porket, J.L. (1998). The Welfare State. In: Modern Economic Systems and their Transformation. St Antony’s Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26696-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics