Advertisement

Centres of Excellence in the International Firm

  • Luciano Fratocchi
  • Ulf Holm

Abstract

In the last decade there has been increasing recognition that the international firm (in the strict sense of one with operations in both national and international markets) is organised as a heterogeneous entity built up of subunits with specific operative responsibilities and specific interrelated roles (Hedlund, 1986; Bartlett and Ghoshal, 1989; Nohria and Ghoshal, 1994; Malnight, 1996). Thus, certain subsidiaries within the international firm are regarded as being especially competent in one or several functional areas. For instance, because of its competence with a particular product, a foreign subsidiary can become globally responsible for production. Similarly, another subsidiary can be specialised in the development of a product, while a third can have responsibility for marketing and international sales. Having one or several operational competences — interrelated with the operational roles of other units of the firm — the specific subsidiary can become a strategic ‘partner’ of the firm’s headquarters (Bartlett and Ghoshal, 1989), with potential impact on strategic decisions (Astley and Zajac, 1990; Ghoshal and Bartlett, 1990).

Keywords

International Business Multinational Corporation Business Relationship Parent Firm Foreign Subsidiary 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amit, R. and P.L.H. Schoemaker (1993) ‘Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent’, Strategic ManagementJournal 14, 33–46.Google Scholar
  2. Andersson U. and J. Johanson (1997) ‘International Business Enterprise’, in I. Björkman and M. Forsgren (eds), The Nature of the International Firm — Nordic Contributions to International Business Research, Copenhagen Business School Press, Handelshojskolens Forlag, 33–49.Google Scholar
  3. Astley, W.G. and EJ. Zajac (1990) ‘Beyond Dyadic Exchange: Functional Interdependence and Sub-Unit Power’, Organization Studies, 11 (4), 481–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartlett, C.A. and S. Ghoshal (1989) Managing Across Borders, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  5. Beige, C.E. and J.K. Stewart (1986) ‘Industrial Adjustments and World Product Mandates: A Role for Public Policy’, in H. Etemad and L.S. Séguin Delude (eds), Managing the Multinational Subsidiary. Response to Environmental Changes and to Host Nation R&D Policies, London: Croom Helm, 23–46.Google Scholar
  6. Bilkey, W J. and G. Tesar (1977) ‘The Export Behaviour of Smaller Wisconsin Manufacturing Firms’, Journal of International Business Studies 8 (Spring/Summer), 93–8.Google Scholar
  7. Birkinshaw, J.M. and AJ. Morrison (1995) ‘Configurations of Strategy and Structure in Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations’, Journal of International Business Studies, (4), 729–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonin, B. and B. Perron (1986) ‘World Product Mandate and Firms Operating in Quebec’, in H. Etemad and L.S. Séguin Delude (eds), Managing the Multinational Subsidiary. Response to Environmental Changes and to Host Nation R&D Policies, London: Croom Helm, 161–76.Google Scholar
  9. Crookell, H. and J. Caliendo (1980) ‘International Competitiveness and the Structure of Secondary Industry in Canada’, Business Quarterly, 45 (3), 58–64.Google Scholar
  10. Forsgren, M. (1989) Managing the Internationalization Process: The Swedish Case, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Forsgren, M., U. Holm and J. Johanson (1992) ‘Internationalisation of the Second Degree — The Emergence of European Based Centres in Swedish International Firms’, in S. Young (ed), Europe and the Multinationals; Issues and Responses for the 1990s, London: Elgar, 235–53.Google Scholar
  12. Forsgren, M., U. Holm and P. Thilenius (1997) ‘Network Infusion in the Multinational Corporation — Business Relationships and Subsidiary Influence’, in I. Björkman and M. Forsgren (eds), The Nature of the International Firm, Handelshojskolens Forlag, Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press, 475–94.Google Scholar
  13. Ghoshal, S. and C. A. Bartlett (1990) ‘The Multinational Corporation as an Interorganizational Network’, Academy of Management Review, 15 (4), 603–25.Google Scholar
  14. Gupta, A.K. and V. Govindarajan (1991) ‘Knowledge Flows and the Structure of Control within Multinational Corporations’, Academy of Management Review, 16 (4), 768–92.Google Scholar
  15. Gupta, A.A. and V. Govindarajan (1994) ‘Organizing Knowledge Flows within MNCs’, International Business Review, 3 (4), 443–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grant, R. (1991) ‘The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage. Implications for Strategy Formulation’, California Management Review, Spring, 114–35.Google Scholar
  17. Hallén, L., J. Johanson and N. Seyed-Mohamed (1991) ‘Interfirm Adaptation in Business Relationships’, Journal of Marketing 55, April, 29–37.Google Scholar
  18. Holm, U., J. Johanson and P Thilenius (1995) ‘Headquarters’ Knowledge of Subsidiary Network Contexts in the Multinational Corporation’, International Studies of Management and Organization, 25 (1–2), 97–120.Google Scholar
  19. Hedlund G. (1986) ‘The Hypermodern MNC — A Heterarchy?’, Human Resource Management, 25 (1), 9–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johanson, J. and J.E. Vahlne (1977) ‘The Internationalization Process of the Firm — A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitment’, Journal of International Business Studies, 8 (Spring/Summer), 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johanson, J. and J.-E. Vahlne (1990) ‘The Mechanism of Internationalization’, International Marketing Review, 7 (4), 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johanson, J. and F. Weidersheim-Paul (1975) ‘The Internationalization of the Firm — Four Swedish Cases’ Journal ofManagement Studies, 12, 305–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lorenz, C. (1994) ‘Cross Border Victory, National Causality’, Financial Times, 6 May.Google Scholar
  24. Lorenzoni, G. and C. Baden-Fuller (1995) ‘Creating a Strategic Centre to Manage a Web of Partners’, California Management Review, 37 (3), 146–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mahoney,J.T. and R. Pandian (1992) ‘The Resource-Based View Within the Conversation of Strategic Management’, Strategic Management Review, 13, 363–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Malnight, T.W. (1996) ‘The Transition from Decentralized to Network-Based MNC Structures: An Evolutionary Perspective’, Journal of International Business Studies, 27 (1) 43–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nohria, N. and S. Ghoshal (1994) ‘Differentiated Fit and Shared Value: Alternative for Managing Headquarters-Subsidiary Relations’, Strategic ManagementJournal 15, 491–502.Google Scholar
  28. Nordström, K.A. (1991) The Internationalization Process of the Firm - Searching for New Patterns and Explanations, Institute of International Business, Stockholm School of Economics.Google Scholar
  29. Peteraf, M.A. (1993) ‘The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based View’, Strategic ManagementJournal 14, 179–91.Google Scholar
  30. Poynter, T.A. and A.M. Rugman (1982) ‘World Product Mandates: How Will Multinationals Respond?’, Business Quarterly, 46 (3), 54–61.Google Scholar
  31. Porter, M.E., O. Sölvell and I. Zander (1991) Advantage Sweden, Stockholm: Nordsted is Juridikförlag.Google Scholar
  32. Roth, K. and AJ. Morrison (1990) ‘An Empirical Analysis of the Integration-Responsiveness Framework in the Global Industries’, Journal of International Business Studies 21 (4), 541–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rugman, A.M. and S. Douglas (1986) ‘The Strategic Management of Multinationals and World Product Mandating’, in H. Etemad and L.S. Séguin Delude (eds), Managing the Multinational Subsidiary. Response to Environmental Changes and to Host Nation R&D Policies, London: Croom Helm, 90–102.Google Scholar
  34. Snow, C. C., R.E. Miles and HJ. Coleman Jr (1992) ‘Managing 21st Century Network Organizations’, Organizational Dynamics, 20, Winter, 5–19.Google Scholar
  35. Surlemont, B. (1994) ‘The Development of Strategic Centres of Excellence (SCE) in Multinational Corporations (MNCs): the Role of Organizational Context’, paper presented at the Strategic Management Society’s 14th Annual International Conference, Jouy-en-Josas, France, September.Google Scholar
  36. Swedenborg, B., G. Johansson-Grahn and M. Kinnwall (1988) Den Svenska Industrins Utlandsinvesteringar 1960–1986, Stockholm: Industrins Utredingsinstitut.Google Scholar
  37. Teece, D., G. Pisano and A. Shuen (1990) ‘Firm Capabilities, Resources and the Concept of Strategy’, Consortium on Competitiveness & Cooperation, working paper no. 90–8, University of California.Google Scholar
  38. Wolf, B.M. (1986) ‘World Product Mandates and Trade’, in H. Etemad and L.S. Séguin Delude (eds), Managing the Multinational Subsidiary. Response to Environmental Changes and to Host Nation R&D Policies, London: Croom Helm, 207–19.Google Scholar
  39. Yamagishi, T., M. Gillmorè and K. Cook (1988) ‘Network Connections and the Distribution of Power in Exchange Networks’, AmericanJournal of Sociology, 93, 833–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luciano Fratocchi
  • Ulf Holm

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations