Skip to main content

Individualism and Interdependence in the Technological Development of MNEs: The Strategic Positioning of R&D in Overseas Subsidiaries

  • Chapter
Multinational Corporate Evolution and Subsidiary Development

Abstract

The growth of decentralised R&D in MNEs is central to the ways these companies approach the new competitive pressures of the global economy of the late twentieth century.(For recent evidence and analysis of R&D in MNEs see Dunning (1994), Dunning and Narula (1995), Fors (1996), Hakanson and Nobel (1993a, 1993b), Howells and Wood (1993), Papanastassiou (1995), Pearce (1989), Pearce and Singh (1992a, 1992b), Taggart (1993).) As these companies seek to define positions for technology in the generation of sustained competitiveness, roles for overseas R&D laboratories can emerge at three distinct levels. In the short term, the pressures of global competition mean that MNEs need to produce their well-established products as effectively as possible. Laboratories operating within the subsidiaries that produce such products may support their operations by assisting in the adaptation of the manufacturing process to host-country conditions and of the products to local tastes. However, to carry competitiveness into the medium term, MNEs need to substantially upgrade their product range, introducing new generations that embody new concepts that extend the industry’s scope.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bartlett, C.A. and S. Ghoshal (1989) Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution, Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C.A. and S. Ghoshal (1990) ‘Managing Innovation in the Transnational Corporation’, in C.A. Bartlett, Y. Doz and G. Hedlund (eds), Managing the Global Firm, London: Routledge, 215–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P.J. and M.C. Casson (1976) The Future of the Multinational Enterprise, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J.H. (1994) Multinational Enterprises and the Globalisation oflnnovatory Capacity, Research Policy, 23, 67–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J.H. and R. Narula (1995) ‘The R&D Activities of Foreign Firms in the United State’, International Studies of Management and Organisation, 25 (1–2), 39–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fors, G. (1996) R&D and Technology Transfer by Multinational Enterprises, Stockholm: Industrial Institute for Economic and Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S. and C.A. Bartlett (1988) ‘Creation, Adoption and Diffusion of Innovations by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations’, Journal of International Business Studies, 19 (3), 365–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hâkanson, L. and R. Nobel (1993a) ‘Foreign Research and Development in Swedish Multinationals’, Research Policy, 22, 373–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakanson, L. and R. Nobel (1993b) ‘Determinants of Foreign R&D in Swedish Multinationals’, Research Policy, 22, 397–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, S. (1967) The Location of Industry and International Competitiveness Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, N., S. Young and D. Lal (1994) ‘Strategic Evolution within Japanese Manufacturing Plants in Europe: UK Evidence’, International Business Review, 3 (2), 97–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howells, J. and M. Wood (1993) The Globalisation of Production and Technology, London: Belhaven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymer, S.H. (1960) ‘The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Investment’, PhD thesis, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molero, J. and M. Buesa (1993) ‘Multinational Companies and Technological Change: Basic Traits and Taxonomy of the Behaviour of German Industrial Companies in Spain’, Research Policy, 22, 265–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molero, J., M. Buesa and M. Casado (1995) ‘Technological Strategies of MNCs in Intermediate Countries: The Case of Spain’, in J. Molero (ed), Technological Innovation, Multinational Corporations and New International Competitiveness, Luxembourg: Harwood, 265–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papanastassiou, M. (1995) ‘Creation and Development of Technology by MNEs’ Subsidiaries in Europe: The Cases of UK, Greece, Belgium and Portugal’, PhD thesis, University of Reading.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papanastassiou, M. and R.D. Pearce (1994) ‘Host-Country Determinants of the Market Strategies of US Companies’ Overseas Subsidiaries’, Journal of the Economics of Business, 1 (2), 199–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papanastassiou, M. and R.D. Pearce (1996) ‘The Creation and Application of Technology by MNEs’ Subsidiaries in Europe’, in F. Burton, M. Yamin and S. Young (eds), International Business and Europe in Transition, London: Macmillan, 207–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papanastassiou, M. and R.D. Pearce (1997a) ‘Technology Sourcing and the Strategic Roles of Manufacturing Subsidiaries in the UK: Local Competences and Global Competitiveness’, Management International Review, 37 (1), 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papanastassiou, M. and R.D. Pearce (1997b) ‘Co-operative Approaches to Strategic Competitiveness Through MNE Subsidiaries: Insiders and Outsiders in the European Market’, in P.W. Beamish and J.P. Killing (eds), Cooperative Strategies: European Perspectives, San Francisco: New Lexington Press, 267–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, R.D. (1989) The Internationalisation of Research and Development byMultinational Enterprises, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, R.D. (1992) ‘World Product Mandates and MNE Specialisation’, Scandinavian International Business Review, 1 (2), 38–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, R.D. (1993) The Growth and Evolution of Multinational Enterprise, Aldershot: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, R.D. (1996) ‘Creative Subsidiaries and the Evolution of Technology in Multinational Enterprises’, paper submitted to special panel sessions, European International Business Association, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, R.D. and M. Papanastassiou (1996a) The Technological Competitiveness ofJapanese Multinationals, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, R.D. and M. Papanastassiou, M. (1996b) ‘R&D Networks and Innovation: Decentralised Product Development in Multinational Enterprises’, R&D Management, 26 (4), 315–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, R.D. and S. Singh (1992a) Globalising Research and Development, London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, R.D. and S. Singh (1992b) ‘Internationalisation of R&D Among the World’s Leading Enterprises: Survey Analysis of Organisation and Motivation’, in O. Granstrand, L. Hakanson, and S. Sjolander (eds), Technology Management and International Business, Chichester: Wiley, 137–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, K. and AJ. Morrison (1992) ‘Implementing Global Strategy: Characteristics of Global Subsidiary Mandates’, Journal of International Business Studies, 23 (4), 715–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taggart,J.H. (1993) ‘Strategy Conflict in the MNE: Parent and Subsidiary’, paper presented to 19th Annual Conference of European International Business Association, Lisbon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D.J. (1976) The Multinational Corporation and the Resource Cost of International Technology Transfer(Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger).

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D.J. (1977) ‘Technology Transfer by Multinational Firms: The Resource Cost of Transferring Technologic Knowhow’, EconomicJournal, 87, 242–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, R. (1966) ‘International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle’, Q,uarterlyJournal of Economics, 80, 190–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1998 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Papanastassiou, M., Pearce, R. (1998). Individualism and Interdependence in the Technological Development of MNEs: The Strategic Positioning of R&D in Overseas Subsidiaries. In: Birkinshaw, J., Hood, N. (eds) Multinational Corporate Evolution and Subsidiary Development. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26467-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics