Abstract
Contemporary mainstream economics is in a state of some disarray. And as apparently increasing numbers of economists are reacting by searching for something more viable it is perhaps not surprising that the social theorising of Hayek is attracting significant attention. For Hayek long ago rejected the path of orthodoxy and set about attempting to elaborate an approach of greater relevance. Criticising in particular the reliance of mainstream economists upon positivist methods and procedures borrowed from the natural sciences, methods and so on that in Hayek’s (1942–4) view ‘contributed scarcely anything to our understanding of social phenomena’ (p. 21), Hayek spent many years attempting to charter a more viable, specifically social scientific, alternative project and route. It is this ‘non-scientistic’ approach of Hayek that provides the focus here.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bhaskar, R. (1978) A Realist Theory of Science, 2nd edn (Brighton: Harvester Press, 1st edn, Leeds, 1975).
Bhaskar, R. (1979) The Possibility of Naturalism (Brighton: Harvester Press).
Bhaskar, R. (1987) Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation (London: Verso).
Bhaskar, R. (1989) Reclaiming Reality (London: Verso).
Fleetwood, S. (1997) ‘Hayek III: The Necessity of Social Rules of Conduct’, in S. F. Frowen (ed.), Hayek: Economist and Social Philosopher — A Critical Retrospect (London: Macmillan), pp. 155–78.
Hayek, F. A. (1942-4) ‘Scientism and the Study of Society’, Economica (various issues); reprinted in The Counter-Revolution of Science (London: Routledge) (page references are to the latter).
Hayek, F. A. (1967) Studies in Philosophy and Economics, (London and Henley: Routledge and Kegan Paul).
Hayek, F. A. (1973) Law, Legislation and Liberty (London, Melbourne and Henley: Routledge and Kegan Paul).
Hayek, F. A. (1988) The Fatal Conceit: The errors of socialism, The Collected Works of Friedrich August Hayek Vol 1, edited by W. W. Bartley III (London: Routledge).
Lawson, T. (1989a) ‘Abstraction, Tendencies and Stylised Facts: A Realist Approach to Economic Analysis’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 13, no. 1 (March), pp. 59–78. Reprinted in T. Lawson, G. Palma and J. Sender (eds), Kaldor’s Political Economy (London and San Diego: Academic Press, 1989). Also reprinted in P. Ekins and M. Max-Neef (eds), Real-Life Economics: Understanding Wealth Creation (London: Routledge, 1992).
Lawson, T. (1989b) ‘Realism and Instrumentalism in the Development of Econometrics’, Oxford Economic Papers, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 236–58. Reprinted in N. De Marchi and C. Gilbert (eds), The History and Methodology of Econometrics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990).
Lawson, T. (1992) ‘Realism, Closed Systems and Friedman’, Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, vol. 10.
Lawson, T. (1994a) ‘A Realist Theory for Economies’, in R. Blackhouse (ed.), New Directions in Economic Methodology (London: Routledge), pp. 257–85.
Lawson, T. (1994b) ‘The Nature of Post Keynesianism and its links to other traditions’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, vol. 16, no. 4 (Summer), pp. 503–38.
Lawson, T. (1994c) ‘Hayek and Realism: A Case of Continuous Transformation’, in M. Colonna, H. Hagemann and O. F. Hamouda (eds), Capitalism, Socialism and Knowledge: The Economics of F. A. Hayek, vol. II (Aldershot: Edward Elgar).
Lawson, T. (1995) ‘A Realist Perspective on Contemporary “Economic Theory’”, Journal of Economic Issues, vol. xxix, no. 1 (March), pp. 1–33.
Madison, G. B. (1990) ‘Getting Beyond Objectivism: the Philosophical Hermeneutics of Gadamer and Ricoer’, in D. Lavoi (ed.), Economics and Hermeneutics (London: Routledge).
Peacock, M. (1993) ‘Hayek, Realism and Spontaneous Order’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, vol. 23.
Hayek, F. A. (1950) The Dilemma of Specialisation, p. 463.
For a discussion of Neurath’s philosophy and its relation to his arguments in the socialist calculation debate, see J. O’Neill (1995) ‘In Partial Praise of a Positivist’, Radical Philosophy, vol. 74, pp. 29–38.
O. Neurath (1944) Foundations of the Social Sicences (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), p. 18 and passim.
F. A. Hayek (1955) Scientism and the Study of Society (New York: Free Press), p. 31.
See R. Bhaskar (1989) Reclaiming Reality (London: Verso), p. 6ff, 67ff et passim.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1997 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lawson, T., Saunders, C.T., O’Neill, J. (1997). Development in Hayek’s Social Theorising. In: Frowen, S.F. (eds) Hayek: Economist and Social Philosopher. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25991-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25991-5_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-25993-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-25991-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)