Abstract
This chapter traces some elements in contemporary global change and then considers some subsequent ways in which the relationship between states, global change and diplomacy in the post-Cold War era needs to be examined. The chapter accepts the need to reconsider many of the traditional assumptions that have underwritten the evolution of international relations as an area of study in the twentieth century. The working assumptions are twofold: notwithstanding the passing of the Cold War, recent manifestations of global change provide structural constraints on traditional understandings of foreign policy and diplomacy that are greater than at any time since the evolution of the modern state system; but states are still the principal agents of foreign policy decision-making and innovative diplomacy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Joseph A. Callimeri, ‘Reflections on the State in Transition’, The State in Transition: Reimagining the Local, National and International (Melbourne, Australia: Melbourne La Trobe University, 1993)
Callimeri and Jim Falk, The End of Sovereignty: Politics in a Shrinking and Fragmenting World (Aldershot, Australia: Edward Elgar, 1992).
Peter J. Haas, Knowledge, Power and International Policy Coordination, International Organization (Special Edition, 46 (Winter 1992), 1–39.
Susan Strange, States and Markets (London: Frances Pinter, 1988)
Strange and J. Stopford, Rival States, Rival Firms: Competition for World Market Shares (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).
Peter F. Drucker, Post-Capitalist Society (New York: HarperCollins, 1993).
J. Scholte, ‘From Power Politics to Social Change: An Alternative Focus for International Studies’, Review of International Studies 19:1, January 1993, 3–21.
Mark W. Zacher, ‘The Decaying Pillars of the Westphalian Temple: Implications for International Order and Governance’, in E.R. Czempiel and J. Rowsenau (eds), Government without Governance: Order and Change in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).
Susan Strange, ‘An Eclectic Approach’, in Craig Murphy and Roger Tooze (eds), The New International Political Economy (Boulder, CO; Lynne Reiner, 1990), 7–15
Strange, ‘The Name of the Game’, in N.X. Rizopoulis (ed.), Sea Changes: American Foreign Policy in a World Transformed (New York: Council on Foreign Relations, 1991), 242–3.
J. Tuchman-Mathews, ‘Redefining Security’, Foreign Affairs 68:1, Spring 1989, 162–77.
Peter J. Haas et al. (eds), Institutions for the Earth: Sources of Effective Environmental Protection (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992)
R.D. Lipshutz and K. Conca (eds), The State and Social Power in Global Environmental Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1992)
I. Rowlands and M. Greene (eds), Global Environmental Change and International Relations (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1991).
John Gerard Ruggie, ‘International Regimes, Transactions and Change: Embedded Liberalism in a Post War Economic Order’, International Organization 36:2, Spring 1982, 379–15.
Kenneth Waltz, The Theory of International Politics (Waltham, MA: Addison Wesley, 1979).
Robert O. Keohane, ‘Multilateralism: An Agenda for Research’, International Journal XLV:4, Autumn 1990, 731–64
J. Ruggie, ‘Multilateralism: Anatomy of an Institution’, International Organization, 46:3, Spring 1992, 561–98.
Robert O. Keohane, International Institutions and State Power (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1989).
Samuel P. Huntington, ‘The USA — Decline or Renewal?’ Foreign Affairs 67:1, Winter 1988/89, 76–96.
Kenneth N. Waltz, The New World Order’, Millennium: A Journal of International Studies 22:2 1993, 187–95.
A. Wendt, The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations’, International Organization 41:3, Summer 1987, 335–70
A. Wendt, ‘Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics’, International Organization 46:2, Spring 1992, 392–425.
John Mearsheimer, ‘Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War’, International Security 15:1, Summer 1990, 5–56.
C. Layne, ‘The Unipolar Illusion: Why New Great Powers will Arise’, International Security, 17:4, Spring 1993, 5–51.
Joseph S. Nye, Bound to Lead (New York: Basic Books, 1990).
Andrew F. Cooper, Richard A. Higgott and Kim Richard Nossal, ‘Bound to Follow? Leadership and Followership in the Gulf Conflict’, Political Science Quarterly 106:3, Fall 1991, 391–410.
Robert Jervis, ‘International Primacy: Is the Game Worth the Candle?’, International Security 17:4, Spring 1993, 52–67.
R.A. Higgott, ‘International Political Economy’ in J. Groom and M. Light (eds), Contemporary International Relations Theory (London: Frances Pinter, 1994)
I. Grunberg, ‘Exploring the Myth of Hegemonic Stability’, International Organization 44:4, Autumn 1990, 431–77.
A.F. Cooper, R.A. Higgott and K.R. Nossal, Relocating Middle Powers: Australia and Canada in an Evolving World Order (Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press, 1993).
Stuart Harris, ‘The Political and Strategic Framework in Northeast Asia’, in Harris and J. Cotton (eds), The End of the Cold War in North-East Asia (Melbourne, Australia: Longmans, 1991).
J. Gowa and E. Mansfield, ‘Power Politics and International Trade’, American Political Science Review 87:2, June 1993, 4408–20.
Paul R. Krugman, ‘Competitiveness: A Dangerous Obsession’, Foreign Affairs 73:1, March/April 1994, 76–96.
R. Powell and D. Snidal, ‘The Relative Gains of International Cooperation’, American Political Science Review 87:3, September 1993, 735–43.
R.A. Higgott, ‘Towards a Non-Hegemonic International Political Economy’, in C. Murphy and R. Tooze (eds), The New International Political Economy (Boulder, CO: Lynne Reiner, 1991).
Harold G. Nicolson, Diplomacy (London: Home University Library, 1939).
P. Cowhey, ‘Domestic Institutions and the Credibility of International Commitments: Japan and the United States’, International Organization 47:2, Spring 1993, 299–326.
Oran R. Young, ‘Political Leadership and Regime Formation: On the Development of Institutions in International Society’, International Organization 45:3, Summer 1991, 281–308
C. Pratt (ed.), Internationalism Under Strain: The North-South Policies of Canada, the Netherlands, Norway and Sweden (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1989)
C. Pratt, Middle Power Internationalism: The North-South Dimension (Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press, 1990)
Gilbert R. Winham, ‘The Impact of System-Change on International Diplomacy’ (Ottawa: Canadian Political Science, June 1993, mimeo), 1–40.
J. Ann Tickner, Gender in International Relations: Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security (New York: Columbia University Press, 1992).
Barry Buzan, People, States and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era (Hemel Hempstead, Harvester Press, 1991)
E. Luttwak, The Endangered American Dream: How to Stop the United States from Becoming a Third World Country and How to Win the Geo-Economic Struggle for Industrial Supremacy (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1993).
David B. Dewitt et al., Building a New Global Order: Emerging Trends in International Security (Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1993).
J. Grieco, ‘Anarchy and Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the New Liberal Institutionalism’, International Organization 42:3, Summer 1988, 485–508.
Tickner, Gender, 1992 and J. Tickner, ‘Inadequate Providers: A Gendered Analysis of States and Security’, The State in Transition: Reimagining the Local, National, and International (Melbourne, Australia La Trobe University, mimeo), 1–26
Cynthia H. Enloe, The Morning After: Sexual Politics at the End of the Cold War (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1993)
Cynthia H. Enloe, Bananas, Beaches and Bayonets: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1989).
Andrew Linklater, Beyond Realism and Marxism: Critical Theory and International Relations (London: Macmillan, 1990).
Hedley Bull, Justice in International Relations: The Hagey Lectures (University of Waterloo, Ontario, 1983/84).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1997 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Higgott, R. (1997). Issues, Institutions and Middle-Power Diplomacy: Action and Agendas in the Post-Cold War Era. In: Cooper, A.F. (eds) Niche Diplomacy. Studies in Diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25902-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25902-1_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-25904-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-25902-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)