The Political Economy of Rehabilitation: The case of the Benedettini Monastery
What should be conserved?
Why do we conserve?
Who should conserve?
How should conservation be carried out?
The ‘contemporary history’ of the building will be examined in a political economy framework to see whether any ‘lesson’ can be derived from this example. Among other things, we will examine whether such an experience provides any hint as to how to address the problem raised by Peacock (1995, p. 2) ‘of marrying public support for conservation with appropriate public action’.
KeywordsStratification Excavation Arena Protec Baumol
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- L. Bobbio, ‘Programmi, attori e interazioni nella politica dei beni culturali’, in L. Bobbio and M. Maggi (eds), Economia e Politica dei Beni Culturali, Turin: La Rosa Editrice, 1994.Google Scholar
- G. De Carlo, Un progetto per Catnia. Il recupero del Monastero di San NicolÓ l’Arena per l’Università, Genoa: Sagep Editrice, 1988.Google Scholar
- E. Giardina and I. Rizzo, ‘Regulation in the Cultural Sector’, in A. Peacock and I. Rizzo (eds), Cultural Economics and Cultural Policies, Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer, 1994.Google Scholar
- G. Giarrizzo, Siciliae Studium Generale. I suoi luoghi, la sua storia, Catania: Maimone, 1990.Google Scholar
- N. Lichfield, Economics in Urban Conservation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
- A. Peacock, ‘A Future to the Past: The Political Economy of Heritage’ (1994 Keynes Lecture in Economics), Proceedings of the British Academy, 87 (1995), pp. 187–243.Google Scholar
- W. W. Powell (ed.), The Non-Profit Sector. A Research Handbook, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
- D. Throsby, ‘The Production and Consumption of the Arts: A View of Cultural Economics’, Journal of Economic Literature, XXXII (1994), pp. 1–29.Google Scholar