Abstract
Since Advielle and Jaurès, several generations of historians have enhanced our knowledge of Babeuf. They worked in a violent century which saw the rise and fall of fascism and Stalinism, and their work could not fail to be influenced by the world around them. For those who saw Stalinist Russia as the consummation of Marxist communism, Babeuf took his place as a pioneer of that tradition. Equally important, in the context of the struggle against fascism, was the idea of the ‘Popular Front’. In France especially, Popular Frontism inherited from nineteenth-century republicanism, from Clemenceau and Jaurès, a view of the relation between socialism and the republican tradition which exerted enormous influence during the twentieth century, and lay behind the Popular Front policies of alliance between the ‘progressive’ bourgeoisie and the working class. Popular Frontism is sometimes seen as an invention of the Communist International, but its roots in French politics lay far deeper. Hence the Communist Party’s Popular Front policy flourished in France while achieving nothing in Britain. Popular Frontism had enormous influence on the appropriation and interpretation of the French Revolution.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See I. Deutscher, The Prophet Unarmed (Oxford, 1970), p. 292.
C. Rakovsky, Selected Writings on Opposition in the USSR 1923–30 (London, 1980), p. 133.
T. Cliff, Trotsky: The Sword of the Revolution 1917–1923 (London, 1990), p. 277.
See H. Siegel, Ästhetische Theorie und künstlerische Praxis bei Il’ja Erenburg (Tübingen, 1979), p. 199.
La Dépêche de Toulouse, 2 September 1902, cited G. Belloni, Aulard historien de la révolution française (Paris, 1949), p. 117.
J. Friguglietti, Albert Mathiez: historien révolutionnaire (Paris, 1974), pp. 158, 180.
J. Dautry, ‘Albert Mathiez’, AHRF 168 (1962) p. 140.
G. Lefebvre, Le directoire (Paris, 1971), p. 33.
Cited J.-L. Rouch, Prolétaire en veston (Treignac, 1984), pp. 85–6.
D. Desanti, L’internationale communiste (Paris, 1970), p. 183.
Cahiers du communisme 29/2 (1952), pp. 203–10; La Pensée, No. 53 (1954), pp. 39–62; see O. Bétourné & A. Hartig, Penser l’histoire de la révolution française (Paris, 1989), pp. 79–81, 111–14.
P. Broué, Trotsky (Paris, 1988), pp. 794, 801.
L. Trotsky, Writings: Supplement 1934–40 (New York, 1979), p. 679.
V. Serge, Memoirs of a Revolutionary (Oxford, 1967), p. 169.
M. Dommanget, Saint-Just (Paris, 1971), pp. 149–50.
D. Guérin, La révolution française et nous (Paris, 1976), p. 63.
See G. Rudé, ‘Les ouvriers parisiens dans la révolution française’, La Pensée XLVIII–XLIX (1953), pp. 108–9.
L. Trotsky, The New Course (Ann Arbor, 1965), p. 114–18.
M. Kun, ‘Victor Daline — opposant’, Cahiers Léon Trotsky No. 38 (1989), pp. 5–12; see also two obituaries by C. Mazauric: AHRF 263 (1986), pp. 87–90; La Pensée 249 (1986), pp. 85–9.
See A. Crosland, The Future of Socialism (London, 1956), pp. 81–2.
E. Tierno Galván, Baboeuf y los iguales (Madrid, 1967).
Copyright information
© 1997 Ian H. Birchall
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Birchall, I.H. (1997). The Shadow of October. In: The Spectre of Babeuf. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25599-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25599-3_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-25601-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-25599-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)