Skip to main content

The Trial

  • Chapter
  • 15 Accesses

Abstract

On 10 May 1796, following a tip-off from Grisel, and after one abortive attempt and considerable bungling, the police arrested Babeuf and Buonarroti and seized a large quantity of weapons and documents. Eventually a total of 65 people were charged with involvement in the conspiracy. The extent of the haul showed the limits of police information. According to Buonarroti (writing some thirty years later, when any need for deception was past) only 29 of the 65 had actually been involved in the conspiracy, and even that figure included members of the Amar committee, which had had only loose and spasmodic connections with the babouvistes.1 Contrary to Cobb’s claim that the government had ‘caught the lot’,2 only three out of seven members of the secret directory were arrested in May; Antonelle was not arrested till the autumn, Lepeletier was tried in absentia, and Debon and Maréchal were never charged. Dommanget argued that Maréchal was not arrested because, having a stammer, he did not participate much in discussion and Grisel was unable to identify him (in addition he may have had friends in high places).3 Doubtless the authorities were not too worried. Since the main aim was intimidation, it did not really matter who was in the dock.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. A. Aulard, Paris pendant la réaction thermidorienne et sous le directoire, tome III (Paris, 1899), pp. 203–4.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cochon, Rapport au directoire exécutif (Paris, 1796).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Buonarroti, I: 147; P. Bessand-Massenet, Babeuf et le parti communiste en 1796 (Paris, 1926).

    Google Scholar 

  4. In J. Droz (ed.), Histoire générale du socialisme, tome I (Paris, 1972), p. 252.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J.-M. Schiappa, ‘Deux inédits de la conspiration pour l’égalité’, AHRF 264 (1986), pp. 217–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Haute-Cour de Justice, Exposé fait par les accusateurs nationaux (Paris, 1797), p. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  7. H. Carnot, Mémoires sur Lazare Carnot (Paris, 1907), I: 39.

    Google Scholar 

  8. V. Daline, ‘Napoléon et les babouvistes’, AHRF 201 (1970), pp. 409–18.

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. Deville, Thermidor et directoire (Paris, 1904), p. 324.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.M. Cammett, Antonio Gramsci and the Origins of Italian Communism (Stanford, 1967), p. 182.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1997 Ian H. Birchall

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Birchall, I.H. (1997). The Trial. In: The Spectre of Babeuf. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25599-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics