Strength and Weaknesses of the Democracy Movement: Limits to the ‘Explosion of Civil Society’

  • Shiu-hing Lo

Abstract

The expansion phase of political parties in Hong Kong signalled the growth of the local democracy movement spearheaded by middle-class liberals. Prior to the 1980s, no real democracy movement emerged in Hong Kong. The pressure groups which mushroomed in the late 1970s influenced the government not on institutional reform but on such social issues as housing and corruption. Strictly speaking, the democracy movement began in 1984 when the Green Paper raised the political awareness of societal elites. While the controversy over Legco’s direct elections in 1988 spurred the liberals to strive for democratisation, the Tiananmen incident politicised the democrats further by prompting them to form political parties which aimed at winning elections at the district, municipal and territory levels.

Keywords

Europe Liner Sine Arena Nial 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 3.
    See Janet L. Scott, ‘Local-Level Election Behaviour in an Urban Area’, Occasional paper no. 6, Centre for Hong Kong Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, January 1985, p. 35.Google Scholar
  2. 16.
    For a discussion of the 1991 Legco elections, see Rowena Kwok, Joan Leung, and Ian Scott, eds., Votes Without Power: The Hong Kong Legislative Council Elections 1991 (Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
  3. 28.
    Kuan Hsin-chi and Lau Siu-kai, ‘Hong Kong’s Search for a Consensus: Barriers and Prospects’, in Chiu Hungdah, ed., The Future of Hong Kong (New York: Quorum Books, 1987), pp. 99–100.Google Scholar
  4. 29.
    Lau Siu-kai, ‘Institutions Without Leaders: The Hong Kong Chinese View of Political Leadership’, Pacific Affairs, vol. 63, no. 2 (Summer 1990), p. 196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 35.
    Lau, ‘Decolonisation Without Independence: The Unfinished Political Reforms of the Hong Kong Government’, Occasional paper no. 19, Centre for Hong Kong Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (May 1987), p. 13.Google Scholar
  6. 45.
    Bernard Luk, ‘Education’, in Tsim and Luk, eds., The Other Hong Kong Report (1989), p. 174.Google Scholar
  7. 47.
    Wong Hin Wah, ‘A Study of Hong Kong Secondary School Civic Education Curriculum Development (1984–1986)’, Doctor of Education thesis, University of California, Los Angeles, 1988, pp. 170–173.Google Scholar
  8. 53.
    Joan Y. H. Leung, ‘Functional Representation in Hong Kong: Institutionalisation and Legitimisation of the Business and Professional Elites’, Asian Journal of Public Administration, vol. 12, no. 2 (December 1990), p. 170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 54.
    Ian Scott, ‘Functional Constituencies and Representation’, paper presented at the seminar ‘Democracy and Political Development: Hong Kong Characteristics’, organised by the Hong Kong Democratic Foundation, May 19, 1991, p. 2.Google Scholar
  10. 58.
    Michael Meadowcroft and Patrick Bradley, Electoral Reform Society: Delegation to Hong Kong Report, 27 January 1991 to February 1991 (London: The Electoral Reform Society, 1991), paragraph 5.7.Google Scholar
  11. 60.
    Michael M. Y. Suen, ‘The Hong Kong Electoral System and its Future Development’, paper presented at the seminar organized by the Democratic Foundation, May 19, 1991, p. 2.Google Scholar
  12. 65.
    See Lau Siu-kai and Kuan Hsin-chi, The Ethos of the Hong Kong Chinese (Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press, 1988), p. 190 and Chapter 3.Google Scholar
  13. Also see Lau Siu-kai, Lee Ming-kwan, Wan Po-san, and Wong Siu-lun, eds., Indicators of Social Development: The Hong Kong 1988 (Hong Kong: Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, 1991), Chapter 8.Google Scholar
  14. For a critique of Lau and Kuan’s cultural approach, see Stephen Davies (Review Article), ‘The Attitude of the Right Side is that of Calm Unbelief’, Asian Journal of Public Administration, vol. 11, no. 1 (June 1989), pp. 126–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 67.
    See Louie Kin-shuen and Shum Kwok-cheung, eds., A Collection of Materials on Hong Kong Elections 1982–1994 (in Chinese) (Hong Kong: The Institute for Hong Kong and Asia Pacific Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 1994), p. 178. Also see Boundary and Election Commission: Report on the 1995 Legislative Council General Election, op. cit., p. 129.Google Scholar
  16. 75.
    For the categories of white-collar clerical and blue-collar manual workers, I borrow from Jack Arn, ‘Public-Sector Unions’, in Ian Scott and John Burns, eds., The Hong Kong Civil Service: Personnel Policies and Practices (Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1988), p. 236.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Lo Shiu-hing 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shiu-hing Lo
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Hong KongChina

Personalised recommendations