Skip to main content
  • 51 Accesses

Abstract

Hong Kong provides a useful case study that illuminates the phases, dynamics and processes of democratisation. In terms of the phases of democratisation, Hong Kong so far has followed a linear model, moving from the preparatory phase before 1984 into the background phase after the Sino-British agreement was reached in 1984. However, the decision phase has been postponed beyond 1997 by the Basic Law, which has become the instrument by which China controls the pace and scope of institutional reforms in Hong Kong.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. However, Hong Kong can politically influence South China, particularly Shenzhen. See Lo Shiu-hing, ‘Hong Kong’s Political Influence on South China: Cross-Border Citizen Participation and Its Impact on the Mainland’s Public Maladministration’, paper presented at an international conference, ‘Political Development in Taiwan and Hong Kong’, held at the University of Hong Kong, February 8–9, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wan Hussin Zoohri, ‘Singapore in 1986: A Political and Social Overview’, in Southeast Asian Affairs 1987 (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 1987), pp. 278–279.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Seah Chee Meow, ‘Parapolitical Institutions’, in Jon Quah, Chan Heng Chee and Seah Chee Meow, eds., Government and Politics of Singapore (Singapore: Oxford University Press, 1987), pp. 176–188.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Robert E. Bedeski, The Transformation of South Korea: Reform and Reconstruction in the Sixth Republic under Roh Tae Woo 1987–1992 (London: Routledge, 1994), p. 23.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. See Victor D. Cha, ‘Politics and Democracy Under the Kim Young Sam Government’, Asian Survey, vol. 33, no. 9 (September 1993), pp. 849–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. For details, see Jaushieh Joseph Wu, Taiwan’s Democratisation (Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1995), pp. 39–41.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Moon Chung-in, ‘Democratisation, National Security Politics and Civil-Military Relations: Some Theoretical Issues and the South Korean Case’, Pacific Focus, vol. 4, no. 2 (Fall 1989), p. 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. See, for example, Edward Friedman, ed., The Politics of Democratisation: Generalising East Asian Experiences (Boulder: Westview, 1994). Chapters in this book do not really analyse external factors that may influence democratisation in East Asia.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1997 Lo Shiu-hing

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lo, Sh. (1997). Conclusion. In: The Politics of Democratization in Hong Kong. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25467-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics