Bolshevising the Comintern, 1924–8

  • Kevin McDermott
  • Jeremy Agnew
Chapter

Abstract

The fiasco of the ‘German October’, the intensification of the inner-party struggle in Soviet Russia and the first real glimmerings of capitalist stabilisation plunged the Comintern into crisis. Against all expectations the European revolution had failed to materialise. The USSR stood alone and isolated. Factional disputes threatened the orderly functioning of the Comintern and the communist parties. Lenin’s untimely demise in January 1924 threw the Bolsheviks into even greater confusion and placed at stake the future direction of the Russian Revolution. The ensuing life and death struggle in the Russian party saw the rise to power of Stalin, a rise accompanied by a process of centralisation and bureaucratisation that was to have a profound and lasting impact on the international communist movement. This process was immensely complex, reflecting the subtle tactical shifts and manoeuvrings of the various protagonists in the battle for Lenin’s mantle. Ideological and operational formulas that became commonplace in the RCP found their way almost irresistibly into the Comintern. If the Russian party was to denounce and ultimately be purged of ‘oppositionists’ and ‘deviationists’, so too was the Comintern and its member sections. Stalin developed a particular penchant for these activities.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 3.
    E. H. Carr, Foundations of a Planned Economy,1926–1929, vol. 3, part I (London, 1976) p. 140.Google Scholar
  2. 7.
    E. H. Carr, Socialism in One Country,1924–1926, vol. 3 (Harmondsworth, 1972) p. 311.Google Scholar
  3. 13.
    F. I. Firsov, ‘Stalin i Komintern’, part 1, Voprosy istorii, no. 8 (1989) p. 5.Google Scholar
  4. 14.
    F. I. Firsov, ‘K voprosu o taktike edinogo fronta v 1921–1924 gg.’, Voprosy istorii KPSS, no. 10 (1987) p. 125.Google Scholar
  5. 17.
    J. V. Stalin, Works, 13 vols (Moscow, 1952–5) vol. 6, pp. 386–7, 391.Google Scholar
  6. 22.
    A. lu. Vatlin, Trotsky i Komintern (Moscow, 1991) p. 15.Google Scholar
  7. 23.
    E. D. Weitz, ‘Bukharin and “Bukharinism” in the Comintern, 191929’, in N. N. Kozlov and E. D. Weitz (eds), Nikolai Ivanovich Bukharin: A Centenary Appraisal (New York, 1990) pp. 59–91.Google Scholar
  8. 24.
    Quoted in R. C. Tucker, Stalin as Revolutionary 1879–1929: A Study in History and Personality (New York, 1974) p. 384 (emphasis in the original).Google Scholar
  9. 25.
    D. Volkogonov, Trotsky, vol. 2 (Moscow, 1992) p. 73.Google Scholar
  10. 30.
    J. Humbert-Droz, De Lénine à Staline. Dix ans au service de l’Internationale communiste,1921–1931 (Neuchâtel, 1971) p. 28.Google Scholar
  11. 32.
    On the ‘extraordinary confusion’ in the PCF, see S. Bahne (ed.), Archives de Jules Humbert-Droz I: Origines et débuts des partis communistes des pays latins, 1919–1923 (Dordrecht, 1970) pp. 182–3.Google Scholar
  12. 36.
    E. J. Hobsbawm, Revolutionaries: Contemporary Essays (London, 1982) pp. 3–5.Google Scholar
  13. 38.
    See A. Gramsci, Selections from Political Writings 1921–1926, trans. and ed. by Q Hoare, (London, 1978) pp. 426–40.Google Scholar
  14. 41.
    E. D. Weitz, ‘State Power, Class Fragmentation, and the Shaping of German Communist Politics, 1890–1933’, journal of Modem History, vol. 62 (1990) p. 294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 49.
    E. H. Carr, Foundations of a Planned Economy 1921–1929, vol. 3, part II (London, 1976) pp. 636.Google Scholar
  16. 52.
    N. N. Kozlov and E. D. Weitz, ‘Reflections on the Origins of the “Third Period”: Bukharin, the Comintern, and the Political Economy of Weimar Germany’, Journal of Contemporary History, vol. 24 (1989) pp. 394–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 58.
    L. Peterson, ‘From Social Democracy to Communism: Recent Contributions to the History of the German Workers’ Movement, 1914–1945’, International Labor and Working-Class History, no. 20 (1981) p. 23.Google Scholar
  18. 65.
    A. Iu. Vatlin, ‘Goriachaia osen dvadtsat vosmogo. (K voprosu o stalinizatsii Kominterna)’, in Oni ne molchali (Moscow, 1991) p. 103.Google Scholar
  19. 66.
    T. Draper, ‘The Strange Case of the Comintern’, Survey, vol. 28 (1972) p. 135.Google Scholar
  20. 67.
    N. I. Bukharin, Problemy teorii i praktiki sotsializma (Moscow, 1989) pp. 298–9 (emphasis in the original). ‘Koba’ was one of Stalin’s pseudonyms.Google Scholar
  21. 69.
    F. I. Firsov, ‘N. I. Bukharin v Kominterne’, in Bukharin: chelovek, politik, uchenyi (Moscow, 1990) p. 189.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kevin McDermott and Jeremy Agnew 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin McDermott
  • Jeremy Agnew

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations