Skip to main content

Abstract

The term applied to the body of work generally accepted as being entirely or largely by Shakespeare is ‘canon’. The word has recently become controversial in its application to bodies of literature, however, because of its ecclesiastical connotation of ‘sacred’ writing, which suggests mystified reasons for including or excluding particular works. Even the more modest meaning of ‘the recognized genuine works’ of an author raises problems, for the evidence attaching Shakespeare’s name to his plays is, when approached from a certain perspective, slight. The Shakespeare canon as it is generally recognized consists of 37 plays and a number of poems, the best-known of which are the sonnets. Existing in a kind of limbo is The Two Noble Kinsmen on which Shakespeare collaborated with John Fletcher around 1612–13; there is resistance against including it in the canon because it is not entirely or mostly Shakespeare’s. This, however, opens up questions about some plays that have not been excluded; Fletcher almost certainly contributed work to Henry VIII and other hands have been detected, though not necessarily with certainty, in a number of other plays. Since we are dealing with a medium that was essentially collaborative in all its aspects, this clearly raises a number of tricky issues about the meaning of dramatic authorship to which we will come in due course.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. E.A. Honigman, in the New Penguin edition of Richard III ( Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1968 ) p. 242.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M.E. Novak and G.R. Guffey (eds), The Works of John Dryden, Vol. XIII: Plays ( Berkeley and London: University of California Press, 1985 ) p. 228.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Greenblatt, Renaissance Self-Fashioning ( Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980 ) p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A.C. Bradley, Shakespearean Tragedy, 1904 (rpt. Greenwich, Conn.: Fawcett Books, 1968) p. xi.

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. Scragg, Discovering Shakespeare’s Meaning: An Introduction to the Study of Shakespeare’s Dramatic Structures (London and New York: Longman, 1994) p. xi.

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. Hawkes, Meaning by Shakespeare ( London, Routledge: 1992 ).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. C.H. Holman and W. Harmon (eds), A Handbook to Literature, 5th edition ( New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1986 ) pp. 436–7.

    Google Scholar 

  8. N. Frye, A Natural Perspective (New York and London: Columbia University Press, 1965) pp. 119, 104.

    Google Scholar 

  9. C.L. Barber, Shakespeare’s Festive Comedy (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1959 ).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Philip Stubbes, The Anatomie of Abuses (1583), in J.D. Wilson (ed.), Life in Shakespeare’s England ( Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1968 ) pp. 225–6.

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Hyland, Shakespeare: Troilus and Cressida ( Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1989 ) pp. 91–3.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Thomas Heywood, An Apology for Actors, 1612 ( London: Reprinted for the Shakespeare Society, 1841 ) p. 52.

    Google Scholar 

  13. L.B. Campbell (ed.), The Mirror for Magistrates, 1938 (rpt. New York: Barnes and Noble, 1960 ), pp. 65–6.

    Google Scholar 

  14. For a very useful examination of Shakespeare’s history plays, their sources and context, see I. Ribner, The English History Play in the Age of Shakespeare ( London: Methuen, 1965 ).

    Google Scholar 

  15. E.M.W. Tillyard, Shakespeare’s History Plays (London: Chatto and Windus, 1944 ).

    Google Scholar 

  16. A Harbage and S. Schoenbaum, Annals of English Drama, 2nd edition, rev. ( Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1964 ) pp. 50–92.

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Greenblatt, Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England ( Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988 ) p. 65.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Thomas Nashe, The Unfortunate Traveller and Other Works, ed. J.B. Steane ( Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1972 ) p. 113.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Patterson, Shakespeare and the Popular Voice ( Cambridge: Basil Blackwell, 1989 ) p. 120.

    Google Scholar 

  20. R.B. Sewall, The Vision of Tragedy (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1959) pp. 7, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J.W. Lever, The Tragedy of State ( London: Methuen, 1971 )

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1996 Peter Hyland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hyland, P. (1996). The Plays. In: An Introduction to Shakespeare. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24952-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics