Skip to main content

The Chronology of Sanctions

  • Chapter
The Scourging of Iraq

Abstract

Economic sanctions — as a ‘silent, deadly remedy’, a ‘very potent’ measure — represent the prosecution of war by nominally non-violent means. In public-relations terms, sanctions are more respectable than biological warfare, more ethically acceptable than bombing, unlikely to generate a heavy toll of fatalities. Instead, we are encouraged to believe, economic sanctions are relatively civilised, an undeniable method of coercion, when adequately enforced, but one that is unlikely to cause the vast suffering associated with a military onslaught.

… No, not war but something more tremendous than war. Apply this economic, peaceful, silent deadly remedy and there will be no need for force. The boycott is what is substituted for war. 1

President Woodrow Wilson

The great advantage of economic sanctions is that on the one hand they can be very potent, while on the other hand they do not involve that resort to force which is repugnant to our objective of peace. 2

John Foster Dulles

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Woodrow Wilson’s Case for the League of Nations, compiled with his approval by Hamilton Foley (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1932) pp. 67, 71, 72.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Evans Clark (ed.), Boycotts and Peace, a Report by the Committee of Economic Sanctions (New York and London: Harper and Brothers, 1923) p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Danforth Newcomb, ‘Old tools for a new job: US sanctions against Iraq’, in Barry R. Campbell and Danforth Newcomb (eds), The Impact of the Freeze of Kuwaiti and Iraqi Assets (London: Graham and Trotman, and International Bar Association, 1990) p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Charles Richards, ‘Jordan is “breaking embargo” say Iraqi officials’, The Independent, London, 13 August 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Colin Hughes, ‘US insists Iraq cordon is not an act of war’, The Independent, London, 14 August 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  7. David Pallister, ‘Coarser bread a sign of things to come as Iraqis prepare for sanctions to bite’, The Guardian, London, 25 September 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bob Woodward, The Commanders (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1991) p. 229.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Leonard Doyle, ‘Iraq “will still face sanctions after crisis”’, The Independent, London, 18 January 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Martin Walker and Hella Pick, ‘British and American aims include finishing Saddam’, The Guardian, London, 23 January 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Middle East Economic Survey, 29 March 1993; Martin Walker, ‘US to stand firm on Iraqi sanctions’, The Guardian, London, 30 March 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ian Black, ‘Pressure grows for end to UN sanctions against Iraq’, The Guardian, London, 29 September 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kenneth R. Timmerman, ‘Saddam heads for final victory in the Gulf war’, The Sunday Times, London, 2 October 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Robert Fisk, ‘Let’s not cry for Kuwait’, The Independent, London, 24 October 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  18. David Hirst and Ian Black, ‘Iraq recognises Kuwait’, The Guardian, London, 11 November 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jonathan Freedland and Ian Black, ‘US and Britain claim virtual no-go zone in southern Iraq’, The Guardian, London, 27 October 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  20. ‘Iraq challenges Security Council’, Gulf Newsletter, Gulf Information Project, London, Number 11 (November/December 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Suzanne Lowry, ‘France acts to bring Iraq out of isolation’, The Daily Telegraph, London, 7 January 1995; Marie Colvin, ‘France breaks rank on Iraq’, The Sunday Times, London, 8 January 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Patrick Cockburn, ‘Iraq uses poison on political opponents’, The Independent, London, 1 February 1995; Ian Black, ‘UK treats poisoned Iraqi’, The Guardian, London, 1 February 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  24. ITAR-TASS news agency (World Service), Moscow, 31 January 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ian Black, ‘Losing out in the battle for Iraq’, The Guardian, London, 4 February 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Patrick Cockburn, ‘Saddam is left weaker after crushing revolt’, The Independent, London, 16 June 1995; Marie Colvin, ‘Saddam shaken as his most loyal clan revolts’, The Sunday Times, London, 18 June 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Karen Dabrowska, ‘Saddam gloats as foes fight each other’, The Guardian, London, 1 July 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  29. David Hirst, ‘Saddam’s top henchmen flee to Jordan’, The Guardian, London, 11 August 1995; Maryann Bird, ‘Family vows to topple Saddam’, The Independent on Sunday, London, 13 August 1995; David Hirst, ‘West probes top Saddam defectors’, The Guardian, London, 12 August 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  30. See, for example, Kenneth R. Timmerman, The Death Lobby: How the West Armed Iraq (London: Fourth Estate, 1992); ‘Terror Arsenal the West ignored’, The Independent, London, 12 September 1990; and the findings of the Scott enquiry, London, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  31. See, for example, Seymour M. Hersh, The Samson Option: Israel, America and the Bomb (London: Faber and Faber, 1991); and William E. Burrows and Robert Windrem, Critical Mass (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Dr H. M. Al-Shaibani, ‘Destruction of 14 Tammuz reactor during the war against Iraq’, The International Scientific Symposium on Post-War Environmental Problems in Iraq, Iraqi Society for Environmental Protection and Improvement (ISEPI), Baghdad, 10–12 December 1994, p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Leonard Doyle, ‘Experts are certain Iraq has bomb technology’, The Independent, London, 16 July 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Leonard Doyle and Tom Wilkie, ‘UN denies Iraq was close to making bomb’, The Independent, London, 5 October 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Frank Barnaby, ‘Iraqi nuclear frisson’, The Guardian, London, 1 November 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  37. The Independent, London, 29 February 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  38. The Independent on Sunday, London, 1 March 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  39. The Sunday Times, London, 1 March 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  40. The Guardian, London, 12 March 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Harvey Morris and Tom Wilkie, ‘Iraq’s bomb project back to square two’, The Independent, London, 21 March 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Leonard Doyle, ‘UN may resort to force over Iraqi weapons’, The Independent, London, 21 July 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  44. The Guardian, London, 25 July 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  45. The Independent, London, 25 July 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  46. The Observer, London, 26 July 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  47. The Independent on Sunday, London, 26 July 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Seth Faison, ‘Tracker of Iraqi arms: Rolf Ekeus’, The New York Times, 28 July 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  49. George F. Seib, ‘US gets ready for military conflict with Iraq over weapons inspections’, The Wall Street Journal, 17 August 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  50. The Guardian, London, 17 August 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  51. The Independent on Sunday, London, 23 August 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ian Katz, ‘Mission improbable’, The Guardian, London, 18 February 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  53. David Usborne, ‘Allies in new Saddam alert’, The Independent, London, 1 July 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Report of the Secretary-General on the Status of the Implementation of the Plan for the Ongoing Monitoring and Verification of Iraq’s Compliance with Relevant Parts of Section C of Security Council Resolution 687 (1991), S/1994/489, United Nations, New York, 22 April 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Thomas Sancton, ‘No longer fenced in’, Time, 22 May 1994, p. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Report of the Secretary-General on the Status of the Implementation of the Special Commission’s Plan for the Ongoing Monitoring and Verification of Iraq’s Compliance with Relevant Parts of Section C of Security Council Resolution 687 (1991), S/1994/1138, United Nations, New York, 7 October 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  58. For example, S/1994/1422, United Nations, New York, 15 December 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Robin Wright, ‘UN recovers Iraqi germ warfare plan’, The Guardian, London, 1 March 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  60. James Bone, ‘Iraq admits to germ warfare’, The Times, London, 24 August 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Report by the Secretary-General pursuant to Paragraph 5 of Security Council Resolution 706 (1991), S/23006, United Nations, New York, 4 September 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Evelyn Leopold, ‘UN set to let Iraq sell oil worth $2bn’, The Independent, London, 14 April 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1996 Geoff Simons

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Simons, G. (1996). The Chronology of Sanctions. In: The Scourging of Iraq. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24921-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics