Skip to main content

‘A Family Affair’: the Lancaster House Agreement

  • Chapter
Diplomacy at the Highest Level

Part of the book series: Studies in Diplomacy ((STD))

Abstract

The great ‘indaba’ held at Lancaster House, London, which successfully achieved the final constitutional settlement of the Rhodesian problem, represented the political culmination of nearly 15 years of bitter and protracted military conflict which had virtually ruined one of the strongest economies in Africa and cost the lives of over 10 000 black and white Rhodesians. As one of the last great ‘Colonial Conferences’1 it was very much a one-off summit in terms of post-war international conference diplomacy. Nevertheless, this marathon conference which took place over three tortuous months between 10 September and 15 December 1979, incorporating over 47 plenary sessions, did exhibit some parallels with the conduct of the great superpower and economic summits of the post-war period. Moreover, it may yet be seen to have bequeathed important political legacies of direct relevance to the current Ulster peace talks in London and Dublin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. For details of the conference proceedings see: Southern Rhodesia: Report of the Constitutional Conference Lancaster House, London Sept–Dec 1979. Cmd paper 7802 (HMSO, 1980). For a comprehensive analysis of the Conference see also J. Davidow, A Peace in Southern Africa: The Lancaster House Conference on Rhodesia 1979 (London, Westview Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  2. For the historical background to the crisis, see especially, D. Martin and P. Johnson, The Struggle for Zimbabwe (London, Faber and Faber, 1981), J. Barber, Rhodesia: The Road to Rebellion (Oxford, OUP, 1967) and R. Blake, A History of Rhodesia (London, Eyre Methuen, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. C. Good, The International Politics of the Rhodesian Rebellion (London, Faber and Faber, 1973), p. 165. See also H. Wilson, The Labour Government 1964–70 (London, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1974), pp. 232–9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Wilson, Labour Government, pp. 195, 717–19, 726–9, 795 for the ‘Fearless’ talks and pp. 199, 194–413, 715–18, 729, 749, 795 and 967 for the ‘Tiger’ talks.

    Google Scholar 

  5. For a detailed discussion of these talks and the earlier, failed, Geneva summit, see D. Owen, Time to Declare (London, Penguin, 1991), chapter 13, pp. 219–318.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ian Smith, Interview, in M. Charlton, The Last Colony in Africa: Diplomacy and the Independence of Rhodesia (Oxford, Blackwell, 1990), p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibid., p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  8. ZIPRA (Zimbabwe People’s Revolutionary Army) was the military wing of ZAPU (Zimbabwe African People’s Union) led by Joshua Nkomo. ZANLA (Zimbabwe African Liberation Army) was, correspondingly, the military wing of ZANU (Zimbabwe African People’s Union) led by Robert Mugabe which had broken away from ZAPU in 1963, two years after ZAPU’s formation in 1961. In 1976, both guerilla armies allied together to form the Patriotic Front (PF).

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. Coker: ‘Decolonisation in the Seventies: Rhodesia and the Dialectic of National Liberation’, in The Round Table, vol. 69 (1979), p. 128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ibid. Martin Meredith provides even more startling evidence of the crisis of white morale. In December 1978, nearly 3000 whites left the country bringing the total number for 1978 to more than 18 000. Over a three year period — 1976–8 — the exodus amounted to nearly 50 000 whites or one fifth of the white population. Even allowing for the number of immigrants, the loss in three years was nearly 32 000. M. Meredith, The Past is Another Country: Rhodesia 1890–1979 (London, Andre Deutsch, 1979), p. 353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Coker, ‘Decolonisation’, p. 128.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Four black parties stood for election: Muzorewa’s UANC (United African Nation Council); Sithole’s wing of ZANU; Chirau’s ZUPO (Zambabwe United People’s Organization); and Ndiweni’s UNFP (United National Federal Party). The Rhodesian Front (RF) easily won the 20 white seats required to keep a controlling influence over the new Zimbabwe-Rhodesia government. Meredith, The Past is Another Country, pp. 361–2.

    Google Scholar 

  13. For detailed analysis of the guerrilla war see, especially, L. H. Gann and T. H. Henriksen, The Struggle for Zimbabwe: Battle in the Bush (New York, Praeger, 1981), T. O. Ranger, Peasant Consciousness and Guerrilla War in Zimbabwe (London, Heinemann, 1985), and D. Lan, Guns and Rain: Guerrillas and Spirit Mediums in Zimbabwe (London, James Currey, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Meredith estimates that over the two years 1976–8 ‘at least 3500 guerrillas and their supporters were killed and hundreds of tons of supplies destroyed’ in Mozambique alone by Rhodesian forces. Meredith, The Past is Another Country, p. 351.

    Google Scholar 

  15. For the deleterious impact upon white morale see, for instance, D. Hills, The Last Days of White Rhodesia (London, Allen and Unwin, 1981), especially chapters 2 and 4.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Thatcher, The Downing Street Years (London, Harper Collins, 1993) p. 72.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ibid., pp. 72–3.

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. R. Weihmiller and D. Doder, US-Soviet Summits: An Account of East-West Diplomacy at the Top 1955–1985 (London, University Press of America, 1986), pp. xii–xiii.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Charlton, Last Colony in Africa, p. 38. As Thatcher later confirmed, ‘after Lusaka I believed that it [the Rhodesian settlement] could be done’. Thatcher, The Downing Street Years, p. 77

    Google Scholar 

  20. Interview with Kaunda in Charlton, Last Colony in Africa pp. 54–5.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Thatcher, The Downing Street Years, p. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Charlton, Last Colony in Africa, p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Interview with Kaunda, ibid., pp. 55–6.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Weihmiller and Doder, US-Soviet Summits, p. xiv.

    Google Scholar 

  25. One of the most overt pressures was the announcement by the Nigerian government on the first day of the Lusaka Summit of their nationalization of BP, an announcement regarded as ‘inexcusable’ and greeted with ‘fury’ by Carrington. Interview with Lord Carrington in Charlton, Last Colony in Africa, p. 47. Carrington also faced pressure from the right wing of the Conservative Party but this was overcome at the October party conference.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Interview with Sir Michael Palliser, ibid., p. 57.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Interview with General Olusegun Obasanjo, ibid., p. 59.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Interview with Kenneth Kaunda, ibid., p. 59.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Interview with Robert Mugabe, ibid., pp. 52–3. Undoubtedly the PF’s exclusion from the Lusaka summit reinforced the desire for a military solution.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ibid., p. 69.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Interview with Kenneth Kaunda, ibid., p. 68.

    Google Scholar 

  32. K. Flower, Serving Secretly, Rhodesia into Zimbabwe 1964–81 (London, John Murray, 1987), p. 232.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Southern Rhodesia, Cmd Paper 7802, pp. 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Thatcher, The Downing Street Years, p. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Davidow, Peace in Southern Africa, chapter 9, pp. 115–21.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ibid., p. 104.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lord Carrington, Reflect on Things Past (London, Collins, 1988), p. 292.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Flower, Serving Secretly, p. 232. Flower was Head of Rhodesian Intelligence.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Carrington, Reflect on Things Past, p. 290.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ibid., p. 291.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Charlton, Last Colony in Africa, p. 63. For an important post-war summit parallel (Rambouillet 1975), see R. D. Putnam and N. Bayne, Hanging Together: Cooperation and Conflict in the Seven-Power Summits (London, Sage, 1987), p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Thatcher, The Downing Street Years, p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Carrington, Reflect on Things Past, p. 299.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Thatcher, The Downing Street Years, p. 77. See also Davidow, Peace in Southern Africa, pp. 109–10.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Weihmiller and Doder, US-Soviet Summits, p. xiii.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Carrington, Reflect on Things Past, p. 301.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Thatcher, The Downing Street Years, p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  48. On 20 December 1979, for instance, Ken Flower received a security briefing from the Rhodesian CIO (Central Intelligence Organization) admitting that ‘the current situation is not good owing to the terrorist presence which has made itself felt … throughout the country with the possible exception of the major urban areas’. Up to 15 000 ZANLA and ZIPRA guerrillas were deployed internally and over 45 000 externally. CIO to K. Flower in Flower, Serving Secretly, p. 248.

    Google Scholar 

  49. For a discussion of the impact of domestic politics upon the conduct of summitry see, especially, Putnam and Bayne, Hanging Together, pp. 276–8.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Flower, Serving Secretly, p. 234.

    Google Scholar 

  51. M. Hudson, Triumph or Tragedy? Rhodesia to Zimbabwe (London, Hamish Hamilton, 1981), pp. 168–9.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Carrington, Reflect on Things Past, p. 293.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Hudson, Triumph or Tragedy? Rhodesia to Zimbabwe, p. 171.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Interview with Mugabe in Charlton, Last Colony of Africa, p. 66.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Interview with Nkomo, ibid., pp. 77–8.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Flower, Serving Secretly, p. 235.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ibid., pp. 235–6. See also Carrington, Reflect on Things Past, p. 297.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Flower, Serving Secretly, p. 239.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Davidow, Peace in Southern Africa, p. 105.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Flower, Serving Secretly, p. 235.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Charlton, Last Colony in Africa, p. 109.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Interview with Shridath Ramphal in Charlton, Last Colony in Africa, p. 109. Indeed, Carrington remembered ‘having to keep Sonny Ramphal … from interfering’. Carrington, Reflect on Things Past, p. 300.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Charlton, Last Colony in Africa, p. 119. As Carrington noted, Machel ‘relied extensively on Rhodesian maize … He was fed up, he had plenty of enemies at home and his internal problems gave him quite sufficient worries.’ Carrington, Reflect on Things Past, p. 294. The ‘maize weapon’ was also used against Zambia by the Muzorewa government during the Conference with maize sales banned on 5 November. See Hudson, Triumph or Tragedy?, p. 172.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Thatcher, The Downing Street Years, p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Flower, Serving Secretly, p. 247.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Thatcher, The Downing Street Years, p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Interview with Sir Michael Palliser in Charlton, Last Colony in Africa, p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Charlton, Last Colony in Africa, p. 82. The USA’s willingness to play a low profile role at Lancaster House may not only have reflected awareness that the problem was very much a Commonwealth ‘internal’ problem but also may have been symptomatic of its post-Vietnam political decline. See Putnam and Bayne, Hanging Together, pp. 16–18 and 272–3.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Thatcher, The Downing Street Years, p. 78.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Interview with Julian Amery in Charlton, Last Colony in Africa, p. 129.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Davidow, Peace in Southern Africa, p. 111.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Carrington, Reflect on Things Past, p. 298.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1996 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yorke, E. (1996). ‘A Family Affair’: the Lancaster House Agreement. In: Dunn, D.H. (eds) Diplomacy at the Highest Level. Studies in Diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24915-2_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics