Abstract
Disraeli died almost exactly a year after leaving office. He remained the leader of his party until the end, having pledged his continued service to the Conservative cause at a gathering of some 500 peers and MPs held at Bridgewater House on 19 May 1880. Disraeli warned the meeting that Gladstone’s ministry posed a serious threat to the power of the aristocracy, because of its dependence on the support of ‘revolutionaries’ (i. e. Radicals), on the backbenches, whose first target was sure to be the system of land tenure. He therefore advised the Conservative Party to support the government whenever possible, in order to encourage it to resist such dangerous pressures. Trying to take an optimistic view of the future, he reminded his audience of how quickly Earl Grey’s Whig administration had lost its popularity after carrying the Great Reform Act, implying that a similar process of disintegration was likely to afflict the Gladstonian Liberals.1 Shortly after the meeting, in a letter to Lord Lytton, Disraeli maintained that it was his wish to retire from public life, but only when a suitable successor had emerged. In the meantime, he was resolved to ‘act as if I were still young & vigorous, & take all steps in my power to sustain the spirit & restore the discipline of the Tory party. They have existed for more than a century & a half as an organised political connection &…they must not be snuffed out.’2
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
5 Disraeli’s Achievement
Richard Shannon, The Age of Disraeli, 1868–1881 (London, 1992), pp. 395–6.
May 1880, in Robert Blake, Disraeli (London, 1966), pp. 721–2.
October 1880, in Shannon, Age of Disraeli p. 412.
It is printed as an appendix to W. F. Monypenny and G. E. Buckle, The Life of Benjamin Disraeli, Earl of Beaconsfield (London, 1929 ed.), Vol. II.
J. P. Cornford, ‘The Transformation of Conservatism in the Late–Nineteenth Century’, Victorian Studies, VII (1963), pp. 35–66;
Mary Chadwick, ‘The Role of Redistribution in the Making of the Third Reform Act’, Historical Journal, XIX (1976), pp. 665–83.
Blake, Disraeli pp. 758–9; Paul Smith, Disraelian Conservatism and Social Reform (London, 1967), pp. 319–25.
Martin Pugh, The Tories and the People, 1880–1935 (Blackwell, Oxford, 1985).
Disraeli to Stanley, 26 December 1848, in J. Matthews and M. G. Wiebe (eds.), Benjamin Disraeli Letters (University of Toronto Press, 1982–), Vol. V, No. 1755.
For a somewhat over–schematic argument along these lines, see Clyde J. Lewis, ‘Theory and Expediency in the Policy of Disraeli’, Victorian Studies, IV (1961), pp. 237–58.
For an early reference to the condition of the people, see Disraeli’s Wycombe address, 1 October 1832, Disraeli Letters, Vol. I, No. 215.
T. E. Kebbel, A History of Toryism (London, 1886), pp. 335, 353, 370.
Roland Quinault, ‘Lord Randolph Churchill and Tory Democracy, 1880–1885’, Historical Journal, XXII (1979), pp. 141–65.
Richard Jay, Joseph Chamberlain: A Political Study (Oxford, 1981), pp. 172–84.
Monypenny and Buckle, Disraeli Vol. II, pp. 1517–19.
Arthur Bryant, The Spirit of Conservatism (London, 1929), pp. 39–40; R. J. White, The Conservative Tradition (London, 1950), p. 15.
Arthur Bryant, The Spirit of Conservatism (London, 1929), pp. 39–40;
R. J. White, The Conservative Tradition (London, 1950), p. 15.
F. J. C. Hearnshaw, Conservatism in England (London, 1933), p. 215. Cf. Lord Henry Bentinck, Tory Democracy (1918), cited by Shannon, Age of Disraeli p. 4.
Reginald Northam, ‘Conservatism the Only Way’ (London, 1939), p. 82.
Geoffrey Butler, The Tory Tradition (London, 1914), pp. 67–8.
Hearnshaw, Conservatism p. 21; White, Conservative Tradition pp. 12–20.
Bryant, Spirit of Conservatism p. 75.
Nigel Fisher, Harold Macmillan (London, 1982), pp. 6, 130–1, 339, 367–8.
Robert Blake, Disraeli (London, 1966);
F. B. Smith, The Making of the Second Reform Bill (Cambridge, 1966);
E. J. Feuchtwanger, Disraeli, Democracy and the Tory Party (Oxford, 1968);
Stanley R. Stembridge, ‘Disraeli and the Millstones’, Journal of British Studies, V (1965), pp. 122–39;
Paul Smith, Disraelian Conservatism and Social Reform (London, 1967).
Norman Gash, Sir Robert Peel (2 vols, London, 1961–72). It might be noted that this interpretation has, in turn, been challenged: e. g. Boyd Hilton, ‘Peel: A Reappraisal’, Historical Journal, XXII (1979), pp. 585–614.
Angus Hawkins, ‘Lord Derby and Victorian Conservatism: A Reappraisal’, Parliamentary History, VI (1987), pp. 280–301.
Ian Gilmour, Inside Right (London 1977), pp. 74–86.
Copyright information
© 1996 T. A. Jenkins
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jenkins, T.A. (1996). Disraeli’s Achievement. In: Disraeli and Victorian Conservatism. British History in Perspective. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24865-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24865-0_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-64343-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-24865-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)