Abstract
Lenin first began to take an interest in philosophy in the years following the failure of the revolution of 1905. This period saw the culmination of a process of critical self-examination that the Russian intelligentsia undertook, prompted partly by developments in contemporary European thought and partly by a resurgence of native religious philosophy led by such prominent thinkers as Berdyaev, Bulgakov, Frank, Struve and Gershenzon. The publication in 1903 of an influential collection entitled Problems of Idealism stands at the beginning of this phase, which culminated in 1909 with the publication of the celebrated Vekhi or ‘Landmarks’ collection. This latter collection was, from its first essay to its last, a denunciation of the barrenness of the whole socialist tradition in both the theory and the practice of the Russian intelligentsia. The militant materialism of Chernyshevsky and Plekhanov had, the contributors maintained, imposed upon Russian populists and Marxists alike an obligatory endorsement of science as the liberator of mankind and the objective criterion of truth. No amount of science, no weight of empirical experience could, however, yield the smallest moral precept — ‘scientific’ socialism of this sort was, they argued, ethically bankrupt. The other great rallying cry of the Russian intelligentsia — service to the popular masses (or the proletariat) was, similarly, an abnegation of the intelligentsia’s role of educating and improving the people.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
B. Shragin and A. Todd (eds), Landmarks (New York, 1972) p. 179.
Ibid., p. 143.
CW, 14, 147.
CW, 34, 361.
K. Marx, Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844 (Moscow, 1961).
Kolakowski, vol. 2, p. 440.
CW, 14, 41.
CW, 14, 54.
CW, 14, 145.
CW, 14, 58.
CW, 14,123.
CW, 14, 109.
CW, 14, 123.
CW, 14, 102.
CW, 14, 46.
CW, 14, 55.
CW, 14, 27.
CW, 14, 130.
CW, 14, 84.
CW, 14, 100.
CW, 14, 130.
CW, 14, 155.
CW, 14, 190.
CW, 14, 134.
CW, 14, 103.
CW, 14, 307.
Kolakowski, vol. 2, p. 451.
L. Althusser, Lenin and Philosophy (London, 1971) p. 56.
Ibid., p. 56.
CW, 14, 326.
CW, 14, 344.
CW, 14, 125, cf. 341.
CW, 14, 318.
CW, 14, 339–40.
CW, 14, 340.
CW, 14, 341.
CW, 14, 343.
CW, 14, 358.
See for example, CW, 14, 261.
CW, 14, p. 120.
CW, 14, 310.
N. K. Krupskaya, O Lenine (Moscow, 1971) p. 75.
See Chapter 2, Note 9.
K. Marx, Capital, vol. 1 (London, 1938), p. xxx.
Ibid., pp. xxx-xxxi.
K. Marx and F. Engels, Collected Works, vol. 1, pp. 25–105.
K. Marx and F. Engels, Selected Correspondence, p. 495.
K. Marx, Capital, vol. 1, p. xxx.
K. Marx, ‘The Holy Family’, Collected Works, vol. 4, p. 119.
Ibid., pp. 35–6, quoted by Lenin in CW, 38, 26–7.
The one brief reference that I am aware of where Marx does appear to concede the operation of the dialectic in the realism of natural science is in a letter to Engels of June 22 1867: ‘I refer to the law Hegel discovered, of purely quantitative changes turning into qualitative changes, as holding good alike in history and natural science’, Marx and Engels, Selected Correspondence, p. 223.
K. Marx and F. Engels, The German Ideology (London, 1965) p. 38.
F. Engels, Anti-Duhring (London, 1948) p. 29.
Ibid., p. 158.
The negation of the negation, according to Engels, ‘holds good in the animal and plant kingdoms, in geology, in mathematics, in history and philosophy (Anti-Duhring, p. 157). Engels’ famous example of the qualitative transformation of water into steam is given on pp. 141–2. The example is clearly taken from Hegel’s Science of Logic, quoted approvingly in CW, 38, 123–24.
Engels, Anti-Duhring, p. 17.
Ibid., pp. 100–3.
Ibid., p. 101.
CW, 14, 309 and 310.
CW, 38, 221–2.
CW, 38, 361.
On this highly important distinction, see, for example, CW, 38, 201.
CW, 38, 253–4, cf. pp. 296 and 361.
CW, 38, 171.
CW, 38, 201.
CW, 38, 359.
CW, 38, 139.
CW, 38, 140.
CW, 38, 283.
CW, 38, 360.
CW, 38, 362.
Engels, Anti-Duhring, p. 141.
CW, 38, 123.
CW, 38, 360.
CW, 38, 284.
CW, 38, 359–63.
CW, 38, 195.
CW, 38, 259.
CW, 38, 109.
CW, 38, 253, cf. p. 177.
CW, 38, 212.
CW, 38, 184.
CW, 38, 342.
Marx and Engels, Collected Works, vol. 3, p. 183.
Ibid., p. 182.
CW, 38, 218.
CW, 38, 39.
CW, 38, 276.
CW, 38, 277.
CW, 38, 180.
The term ‘philosophical practice’ is Louis Althusser’s.
MESW, 1, 46.
CW, 36, 595.
Communist Party of the Soviet Union, History of the CPSU (Bolsheviks) Short Course (Moscow, 1938) pp. 105–31. Stalin’s chapter, ‘Dialectical and Historical Materialism’, also appears in his book Problems of Leninism (Moscow, 1953) pp. 713–15.
Copyright information
© 1996 Neil Harding
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harding, N. (1996). A Philosophy of Certainty: Dialectical Materialism. In: Leninism. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24775-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24775-2_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-66483-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-24775-2