Skip to main content

A Philosophy of Certainty: Dialectical Materialism

  • Chapter
Leninism
  • 61 Accesses

Abstract

Lenin first began to take an interest in philosophy in the years following the failure of the revolution of 1905. This period saw the culmination of a process of critical self-examination that the Russian intelligentsia undertook, prompted partly by developments in contemporary European thought and partly by a resurgence of native religious philosophy led by such prominent thinkers as Berdyaev, Bulgakov, Frank, Struve and Gershenzon. The publication in 1903 of an influential collection entitled Problems of Idealism stands at the beginning of this phase, which culminated in 1909 with the publication of the celebrated Vekhi or ‘Landmarks’ collection. This latter collection was, from its first essay to its last, a denunciation of the barrenness of the whole socialist tradition in both the theory and the practice of the Russian intelligentsia. The militant materialism of Chernyshevsky and Plekhanov had, the contributors maintained, imposed upon Russian populists and Marxists alike an obligatory endorsement of science as the liberator of mankind and the objective criterion of truth. No amount of science, no weight of empirical experience could, however, yield the smallest moral precept — ‘scientific’ socialism of this sort was, they argued, ethically bankrupt. The other great rallying cry of the Russian intelligentsia — service to the popular masses (or the proletariat) was, similarly, an abnegation of the intelligentsia’s role of educating and improving the people.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. B. Shragin and A. Todd (eds), Landmarks (New York, 1972) p. 179.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ibid., p. 143.

    Google Scholar 

  3. CW, 14, 147.

    Google Scholar 

  4. CW, 34, 361.

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. Marx, Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844 (Moscow, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kolakowski, vol. 2, p. 440.

    Google Scholar 

  7. CW, 14, 41.

    Google Scholar 

  8. CW, 14, 54.

    Google Scholar 

  9. CW, 14, 145.

    Google Scholar 

  10. CW, 14, 58.

    Google Scholar 

  11. CW, 14,123.

    Google Scholar 

  12. CW, 14, 109.

    Google Scholar 

  13. CW, 14, 123.

    Google Scholar 

  14. CW, 14, 102.

    Google Scholar 

  15. CW, 14, 46.

    Google Scholar 

  16. CW, 14, 55.

    Google Scholar 

  17. CW, 14, 27.

    Google Scholar 

  18. CW, 14, 130.

    Google Scholar 

  19. CW, 14, 84.

    Google Scholar 

  20. CW, 14, 100.

    Google Scholar 

  21. CW, 14, 130.

    Google Scholar 

  22. CW, 14, 155.

    Google Scholar 

  23. CW, 14, 190.

    Google Scholar 

  24. CW, 14, 134.

    Google Scholar 

  25. CW, 14, 103.

    Google Scholar 

  26. CW, 14, 307.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kolakowski, vol. 2, p. 451.

    Google Scholar 

  28. L. Althusser, Lenin and Philosophy (London, 1971) p. 56.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ibid., p. 56.

    Google Scholar 

  30. CW, 14, 326.

    Google Scholar 

  31. CW, 14, 344.

    Google Scholar 

  32. CW, 14, 125, cf. 341.

    Google Scholar 

  33. CW, 14, 318.

    Google Scholar 

  34. CW, 14, 339–40.

    Google Scholar 

  35. CW, 14, 340.

    Google Scholar 

  36. CW, 14, 341.

    Google Scholar 

  37. CW, 14, 343.

    Google Scholar 

  38. CW, 14, 358.

    Google Scholar 

  39. See for example, CW, 14, 261.

    Google Scholar 

  40. CW, 14, p. 120.

    Google Scholar 

  41. CW, 14, 310.

    Google Scholar 

  42. N. K. Krupskaya, O Lenine (Moscow, 1971) p. 75.

    Google Scholar 

  43. See Chapter 2, Note 9.

    Google Scholar 

  44. K. Marx, Capital, vol. 1 (London, 1938), p. xxx.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ibid., pp. xxx-xxxi.

    Google Scholar 

  46. K. Marx and F. Engels, Collected Works, vol. 1, pp. 25–105.

    Google Scholar 

  47. K. Marx and F. Engels, Selected Correspondence, p. 495.

    Google Scholar 

  48. K. Marx, Capital, vol. 1, p. xxx.

    Google Scholar 

  49. K. Marx, ‘The Holy Family’, Collected Works, vol. 4, p. 119.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ibid., pp. 35–6, quoted by Lenin in CW, 38, 26–7.

    Google Scholar 

  51. The one brief reference that I am aware of where Marx does appear to concede the operation of the dialectic in the realism of natural science is in a letter to Engels of June 22 1867: ‘I refer to the law Hegel discovered, of purely quantitative changes turning into qualitative changes, as holding good alike in history and natural science’, Marx and Engels, Selected Correspondence, p. 223.

    Google Scholar 

  52. K. Marx and F. Engels, The German Ideology (London, 1965) p. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  53. F. Engels, Anti-Duhring (London, 1948) p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Ibid., p. 158.

    Google Scholar 

  55. The negation of the negation, according to Engels, ‘holds good in the animal and plant kingdoms, in geology, in mathematics, in history and philosophy (Anti-Duhring, p. 157). Engels’ famous example of the qualitative transformation of water into steam is given on pp. 141–2. The example is clearly taken from Hegel’s Science of Logic, quoted approvingly in CW, 38, 123–24.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Engels, Anti-Duhring, p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ibid., pp. 100–3.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ibid., p. 101.

    Google Scholar 

  59. CW, 14, 309 and 310.

    Google Scholar 

  60. CW, 38, 221–2.

    Google Scholar 

  61. CW, 38, 361.

    Google Scholar 

  62. On this highly important distinction, see, for example, CW, 38, 201.

    Google Scholar 

  63. CW, 38, 253–4, cf. pp. 296 and 361.

    Google Scholar 

  64. CW, 38, 171.

    Google Scholar 

  65. CW, 38, 201.

    Google Scholar 

  66. CW, 38, 359.

    Google Scholar 

  67. CW, 38, 139.

    Google Scholar 

  68. CW, 38, 140.

    Google Scholar 

  69. CW, 38, 283.

    Google Scholar 

  70. CW, 38, 360.

    Google Scholar 

  71. CW, 38, 362.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Engels, Anti-Duhring, p. 141.

    Google Scholar 

  73. CW, 38, 123.

    Google Scholar 

  74. CW, 38, 360.

    Google Scholar 

  75. CW, 38, 284.

    Google Scholar 

  76. CW, 38, 359–63.

    Google Scholar 

  77. CW, 38, 195.

    Google Scholar 

  78. CW, 38, 259.

    Google Scholar 

  79. CW, 38, 109.

    Google Scholar 

  80. CW, 38, 253, cf. p. 177.

    Google Scholar 

  81. CW, 38, 212.

    Google Scholar 

  82. CW, 38, 184.

    Google Scholar 

  83. CW, 38, 342.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Marx and Engels, Collected Works, vol. 3, p. 183.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Ibid., p. 182.

    Google Scholar 

  86. CW, 38, 218.

    Google Scholar 

  87. CW, 38, 39.

    Google Scholar 

  88. CW, 38, 276.

    Google Scholar 

  89. CW, 38, 277.

    Google Scholar 

  90. CW, 38, 180.

    Google Scholar 

  91. The term ‘philosophical practice’ is Louis Althusser’s.

    Google Scholar 

  92. MESW, 1, 46.

    Google Scholar 

  93. CW, 36, 595.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Communist Party of the Soviet Union, History of the CPSU (Bolsheviks) Short Course (Moscow, 1938) pp. 105–31. Stalin’s chapter, ‘Dialectical and Historical Materialism’, also appears in his book Problems of Leninism (Moscow, 1953) pp. 713–15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1996 Neil Harding

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harding, N. (1996). A Philosophy of Certainty: Dialectical Materialism. In: Leninism. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24775-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24775-2_10

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-66483-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-24775-2

Publish with us

Policies and ethics