Abstract
In the last chapter, I stressed the complexity, intricacy and variety of the research process, and the premium this places on the refinement of procedures of assessment, on the developing of guidelines that can help us to track this variety. I went on to discuss the relationship between research and writing and how the guidelines must help us to track the research within — and often in spite of — the writing (or whatever textual form it appears in). Reflexivity should be part of, directed towards, both research and writing, analysis and textuality. The display of reflexivity in the text should be a display of reflexivity about the analysis, and about the moves made in the construction of the text — it should reflect upon and expose its textual devices.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 1996 Rob Stones
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stones, R. (1996). The Pivotal Role of the Methodological Focus: A Positive Critique of Anthony Giddens. In: Sociological Reasoning. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24737-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24737-0_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-58930-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-24737-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)