Skip to main content

The Pivotal Role of the Methodological Focus: A Positive Critique of Anthony Giddens

  • Chapter
Sociological Reasoning
  • 15 Accesses

Abstract

In the last chapter, I stressed the complexity, intricacy and variety of the research process, and the premium this places on the refinement of procedures of assessment, on the developing of guidelines that can help us to track this variety. I went on to discuss the relationship between research and writing and how the guidelines must help us to track the research within — and often in spite of — the writing (or whatever textual form it appears in). Reflexivity should be part of, directed towards, both research and writing, analysis and textuality. The display of reflexivity in the text should be a display of reflexivity about the analysis, and about the moves made in the construction of the text — it should reflect upon and expose its textual devices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Copyright information

© 1996 Rob Stones

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stones, R. (1996). The Pivotal Role of the Methodological Focus: A Positive Critique of Anthony Giddens. In: Sociological Reasoning. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24737-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics