Skip to main content

Theorising Modern Family Life

  • Chapter
Introductory Sociology

Abstract

This chapter attempts to identify the agencies at work in modern society which promote nuclear family living. Different perspectives on the virtues of this form of family are examined and the assumptions about individual freedom and obligation underpinning these are explored. Recent evidence about an increase in diversity in family living offers an opportunity for alternative theories of modern family life to be articulated, and these are the subject of the chapter’s concluding section.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abrams, P. (1982) Historical Sociology, London, Open Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahrono, C. and R. Rodgers (1987) Divorced Families, London, W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, K. (1989) Single Women/Family Ties, Newbury Park, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariès, P. (1973) Centuries of Childhood, Harmondsworth, Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boh, K. (1989) Changing Patterns of European Family Life, London, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1965) Child Care and the Growth of Love, Harmondsworth, Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1971) Attachment and Loss, vol. I, Harmondsworth, Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1975) Attachment and Loss, vol. II, Harmondsworth, Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, H. (1992) ‘Changing social divisions: class, gender and race’, in R. Bocock and K. Thompson (eds), Social and Cultural Forms of Modernity, Oxford, Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheal, D. (1991) Family and the State of Theory, Hemel Hempstead, Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotton, S. et al. (1983) ‘Living together’, in A. Burns et al. (eds), The Family in the Modern World, London, Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, H. (1992) Women and the Domestic Sphere in R. Bocock and K. Thompson (eds), Social and Cultural Forms of Modernity, Oxford, Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edholm, F. (1982) ‘The unnatural family’, in E. Whitelegg et al. (eds), The Changing Experience of Women, Oxford, Martin Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1995) ‘The parental deficit’, The Guardian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, M. and M. Hepworth (1989) ‘Ageing and old age: reflections on the postmodern life course’, in B. Bytheway et al. (eds), Becoming and Being Old, London, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch, J. (1987) ‘Family obligations and the life course’, in A. Bryman et al. (eds), Rethinking the Life Cycle, London, Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, R. (1967) Kinship and Marriage, Harmondsworth, Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furstenburg, F. et al. (1987) Adolescent Mothers in Late Life, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gerstel, N. and H. Gross (1984) Commuter Marriage, London, Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, H. (1988) Informal Carers (General Household Survey 1985, Supplement) London, HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, H. (1980) ‘Dual-career couples who live apart’ Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henwood, M. et al. (1987) Inside the Family: Changing Roles of Women and Men, London, Family Policy Study Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertz, R. (1986) More Equal than Others, Berkeley, Calif., University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.-F. (1984) The Postmodern Condition, Manchester, Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lister, R. (1984) ‘There is an alternative’, in A. Walker and C. Walker (eds), The Growing Divide, London, CPAG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. H. J. (1985) The Family, Politics and Social Theory, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, A. (1974) The Sociology of Housework, London, Martin Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, M. (1995) The Observer, 26 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, R. N., M. Fogarty and R. Rapoport (1982) Families in Britain, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renvoize, J. (1985) Going Solo, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanworth, M. (1987) Reproductive Technologies, Oxford, Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toynbee, P. (1995) ‘Happy families: a game of charades’, The Independent, 22 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trost, J. (1977) ‘The family life cycle: a problematic concept’, in J. Cuisenier (ed.), The Family Life Cycle in European Societies, The Hague, Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. (1987) Medical Power and Social Knowledge, London, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veevers, J. (1980) Childless by Choice, Toronto, Butterworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. (1977) Women and the Welfare State, London, Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. and P. Wilmott (1973) The Symmetrical Family, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1996 Tony Bilton, Kevin Bonnett, Pip Jones, David Skinner, Michelle Stanworth, Andrew Webster

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bilton, T., Bonnett, K., Jones, P., Skinner, D., Stanworth, M., Webster, A. (1996). Theorising Modern Family Life. In: Introductory Sociology. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24712-7_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24712-7_15

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-66511-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-24712-7

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics