Abstract
I wish to conclude my exercise of looking at the ethical dimen-sions of particular narratives through exploring texts that, though not written recently, have tremendous influence on contemporary Western culture and, in turn, contemporary Western narratives. The Hebrew Bible and the Christian New Testament are two texts (actually many texts) whose contribution to Western culture’s literary canon are obvious and undeniable, in particular in relation to character, plot, theme, and religious/theological ideology. I have heard since my early years in school that a person cannot understand the ‘classic’ literature of Western culture if s/he does not know the Hebrew Bible and the Christian New Testament.
I love to tell the story, Because I know ’tis true; It satisfies my longings As nothing else can do. Katherine Hankey, ‘I Love to Tell the Story,’ Christian Hymn
There are writings entitled, for example, Entete [Genesis], the Gospels, Revelation [Apocalypse], and so forth. I would like to speak of them here, to attempt to read them, to move to them from, for example, The Triumph of Life, La folie du jour, L’arrêf de mort ... and the story, the narrative, of ‘Living On’ as differance, with an a, between archeology and eschatology, as difference in apocalypse. That will be a while in coming. Jacques Derrida, ‘Living On’
There is no such thing as generic homo religiousus. Caroline Walker Bynum, ‘Complexity of Symbols’
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Robert Detweiler, ‘Introduction’, in ‘Derrida and Biblical Studies’, Semeia, vol. 23 (1982) p. 1.
I wish to make four comments here. First, there is a wonderful world of scholarship by women that reveals the important and profound roles played by women, roles hidden by tradition, during the formation of the Jewish and Christian traditions. I am addressing only the roles of women in these particular texts. Secondly, I am dealing strictly with stories found in these texts. I am not dealing with Midrashic traditions in relation to the Hebrew Bible nor the history of interpretation in relation to the New Testament. Thirdly, my suggestion is straightforward: regardless of the traditions of interpretations within these traditions, the texts themselves tell stories of victimisation and violence. Finally, I am not suggesting by my commentary that Jews and Christians think and act in a particular manner but only that texts of these traditions suggest profound influence on our culture.
Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite, ‘You May Enjoy the “Spoil of Your Enemies”’, in ‘Women, War, and Metaphor: Language and Society in the Study of the Hebrew Bible’, Semeia, vol. 61 (1993) p. 61.
David Jasper, Rhetoric, Power and Community (London: Macmillan, 1993) p. x.
I use ‘religious/theological’ because in the context of my discussion, I see theology as a subset of religion. While all religion is not theological, perhaps I could suggest that theology is religious. In terms of the rhetoric of religion, I am simply trying to remind us that theology is a rhetorical tool of religious discourse.
I do not wish to suggest that ‘all’ the stories of our biblical texts are bad, violent and therefore unnecessary, if not detrimental. Remember, I have suggested that the master plot may very well have good and profound things to say to persons who confess these sacred stories. Yet I am reminding the reader that the narrative scar of the text allows for a plot line that reads over against the master plot in order to tell another story, of at least equal importance, the telling of which has some dependence on the master plot’s existence. And the master plot exists only by nature of this other story.
Thistlethwaite, ‘You May Enjoy the “Spoil of Our Enemies”’, p. 60.
All biblical quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version, The New Oxford Annotated Bible with the Apocrypha (London: Oxford University Press, 1991).
Ita Sheres, Dinah’s Rebellion: A Biblical Parable for Our Time (New York: Crossroad, 1990) p. 7.
Bernard of Clairvaux, Treatises II: The Book on Loving God and The Steps of Humility and Pride (Kalamazoo, Mich.: Cistercian Publications, 1980) p. 58.
Sheres, Dinah’s Rebellion, p. 6.
The elevation of Mary in Catholicism is not, as I understand it, biblical but rather traditional. I would suggest that Mary’s prominence could be as a result of some need to compensate her for her victimisation. Furthermore, her elevation does not place her as an equal to the Trinity but merely as being ‘blessed among women’. For further discussion of woman’s relation to Christianity, see for example, Sharon D. Welch, A Feminist Ethic of Risk (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1989); Judith L. Weidman (ed.). Christian Feminism: Visions of a New Humanity (New York: Harper & Row, 1984); Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite and Mary Potter Engel (eds). Lift Every Voice: Constructing Christian Theologies from the Underside (New York: Harper & Row, 1990).
Hélène Cixous, ‘Sorties’, in New French Feminisms: An Anthology, ed. Elaine Marks and Isabelle de Courtivron (Amherst, Mass.: University of Massachusetts Press, 1980), pp. 259–60.
Holy is used only seven times in Mark’s gospel.
The word is used eighteen times in Mark. Each time it is used in Chapters 1 and 3, it is in relation to demons, except this time.
Werner Kelber, The Oral and the Written Gospel (Philadelphia, Perm.: Fortress Press, 1983) pp. 75ff.
Copyright information
© 1996 Mark Ledbetter
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ledbetter, M. (1996). (Re)telling the Old, Old Story. In: Victims and the Postmodern Narrative or Doing Violence to the Body. Studies in Literature and Religion. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24590-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24590-1_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-24592-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-24590-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)