Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Literature and Religion ((SLR))

  • 38 Accesses

Abstract

I wish to conclude my exercise of looking at the ethical dimen-sions of particular narratives through exploring texts that, though not written recently, have tremendous influence on contemporary Western culture and, in turn, contemporary Western narratives. The Hebrew Bible and the Christian New Testament are two texts (actually many texts) whose contribution to Western culture’s literary canon are obvious and undeniable, in particular in relation to character, plot, theme, and religious/theological ideology. I have heard since my early years in school that a person cannot understand the ‘classic’ literature of Western culture if s/he does not know the Hebrew Bible and the Christian New Testament.

I love to tell the story, Because I know ’tis true; It satisfies my longings As nothing else can do. Katherine Hankey, ‘I Love to Tell the Story,’ Christian Hymn

There are writings entitled, for example, Entete [Genesis], the Gospels, Revelation [Apocalypse], and so forth. I would like to speak of them here, to attempt to read them, to move to them from, for example, The Triumph of Life, La folie du jour, L’arrêf de mort ... and the story, the narrative, ofLiving Onas differance, with an a, between archeology and eschatology, as difference in apocalypse. That will be a while in coming. Jacques Derrida, ‘Living On’

There is no such thing as generic homo religiousus. Caroline Walker Bynum, ‘Complexity of Symbols’

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Robert Detweiler, ‘Introduction’, in ‘Derrida and Biblical Studies’, Semeia, vol. 23 (1982) p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. I wish to make four comments here. First, there is a wonderful world of scholarship by women that reveals the important and profound roles played by women, roles hidden by tradition, during the formation of the Jewish and Christian traditions. I am addressing only the roles of women in these particular texts. Secondly, I am dealing strictly with stories found in these texts. I am not dealing with Midrashic traditions in relation to the Hebrew Bible nor the history of interpretation in relation to the New Testament. Thirdly, my suggestion is straightforward: regardless of the traditions of interpretations within these traditions, the texts themselves tell stories of victimisation and violence. Finally, I am not suggesting by my commentary that Jews and Christians think and act in a particular manner but only that texts of these traditions suggest profound influence on our culture.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite, ‘You May Enjoy the “Spoil of Your Enemies”’, in ‘Women, War, and Metaphor: Language and Society in the Study of the Hebrew Bible’, Semeia, vol. 61 (1993) p. 61.

    Google Scholar 

  4. David Jasper, Rhetoric, Power and Community (London: Macmillan, 1993) p. x.

    Google Scholar 

  5. I use ‘religious/theological’ because in the context of my discussion, I see theology as a subset of religion. While all religion is not theological, perhaps I could suggest that theology is religious. In terms of the rhetoric of religion, I am simply trying to remind us that theology is a rhetorical tool of religious discourse.

    Google Scholar 

  6. I do not wish to suggest that ‘all’ the stories of our biblical texts are bad, violent and therefore unnecessary, if not detrimental. Remember, I have suggested that the master plot may very well have good and profound things to say to persons who confess these sacred stories. Yet I am reminding the reader that the narrative scar of the text allows for a plot line that reads over against the master plot in order to tell another story, of at least equal importance, the telling of which has some dependence on the master plot’s existence. And the master plot exists only by nature of this other story.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Thistlethwaite, ‘You May Enjoy the “Spoil of Our Enemies”’, p. 60.

    Google Scholar 

  8. All biblical quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version, The New Oxford Annotated Bible with the Apocrypha (London: Oxford University Press, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ita Sheres, Dinah’s Rebellion: A Biblical Parable for Our Time (New York: Crossroad, 1990) p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bernard of Clairvaux, Treatises II: The Book on Loving God and The Steps of Humility and Pride (Kalamazoo, Mich.: Cistercian Publications, 1980) p. 58.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sheres, Dinah’s Rebellion, p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  12. The elevation of Mary in Catholicism is not, as I understand it, biblical but rather traditional. I would suggest that Mary’s prominence could be as a result of some need to compensate her for her victimisation. Furthermore, her elevation does not place her as an equal to the Trinity but merely as being ‘blessed among women’. For further discussion of woman’s relation to Christianity, see for example, Sharon D. Welch, A Feminist Ethic of Risk (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1989); Judith L. Weidman (ed.). Christian Feminism: Visions of a New Humanity (New York: Harper & Row, 1984); Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite and Mary Potter Engel (eds). Lift Every Voice: Constructing Christian Theologies from the Underside (New York: Harper & Row, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hélène Cixous, ‘Sorties’, in New French Feminisms: An Anthology, ed. Elaine Marks and Isabelle de Courtivron (Amherst, Mass.: University of Massachusetts Press, 1980), pp. 259–60.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Holy is used only seven times in Mark’s gospel.

    Google Scholar 

  15. The word is used eighteen times in Mark. Each time it is used in Chapters 1 and 3, it is in relation to demons, except this time.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Werner Kelber, The Oral and the Written Gospel (Philadelphia, Perm.: Fortress Press, 1983) pp. 75ff.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1996 Mark Ledbetter

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ledbetter, M. (1996). (Re)telling the Old, Old Story. In: Victims and the Postmodern Narrative or Doing Violence to the Body. Studies in Literature and Religion. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24590-1_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics