Abstract
Despite the emphasis on the social construction of sexuality in both feminist and wider social theory, we have yet to find satisfactory ways of conceptualizing sexuality as fully social. In part this derives from a lack of consensus as to what is meant by social construction and how it should be analysed. Feminists are also deeply divided on the politics of sexuality: on what it is about sexuality as currently constituted that needs to be challenged and on strategies for change. In this paper I will explore some of these problems and debates in order to seek a way forward for feminist analysis. I am not proposing some new definitive perspective on sexuality, nor will I attempt to answer all the questions I raise. I will, however, suggest some preconditions for theorizing about sexuality which I think are fundamental to an approach which is both feminist and sociological.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bartky, S. (1990), Femininity and Domination (New York: Routledge).
Bartky, S. (1993), ‘Hypatia Unbound: A Confession’, in S. Wilkinson and C. Kitzinger (eds), Heterosexuality (London: Sage).
Butler, J. (1990a), Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (New York: Routledge).
Butler, J. (1990b), ‘Gender Trouble, Feminist Theory and Psychoanalytic Discourse’, in L. Nicholson (ed.), Feminism/Postmodernism (New York: Routledge).
Butler, J. (1991), ‘Imitation and Gender Insubordination’, in D. Fuss (ed.), Inside/Out (New York: Routledge).
Butler, J. (1993), Bodies that Matter (New York: Routledge).
Cameron, D. (1993), ‘Telling It Like It Wasn’t: How Radical Feminism Became history’, Trouble and Strife, 27: pp. 11–15.
Cameron, D. and Frazer, E. (1987), The Lust to Kill (Oxford: Polity Press).
Campbell, B. (1980), ‘Feminist Sexual Politics’, Feminist Review, 5: pp. 1–18.
Delphy, C. (1984), Close to Home: A Materialist Analysis of Women’s Oppression (London: Hutchinson).
Delphy, C. (1992), ‘Mothers’ Union?’, Trouble and Strife, 24: pp. 12–19.
Delphy, C. (1993), ‘Rethinking Sex and Gender’, Women’s Studies International Forum, 16 (1): pp. 1–9.
Delphy, C. and Leonard, D. (1992), Familiar Exploitation: A New Analysis of Marriage in Contemporary Western Societies (Oxford: Polity Press).
Dworkin, A. (1987), Intercourse (London: Secker & Warburg).
Evans, M. (1994), ‘Desire Incarnate: Review of Judith Butler’s Bodies that Matter’, The Times Higher Education Supplement, 18 February.
Foucault, M. (1980), ‘Truth and Power’, in C. Gordon (ed.), Michel Foucault: Power/Knowledge (Brighton: Harvester).
Foucault, M. (1981), The History of Sexuality, volume 1 (Harmondsworth: Penguin).
Fraser, N. (1989), Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory (Oxford: Polity Press).
Fuss, D. (1991) (ed.), Inside/Out: Lesbian Theories, Gay Theories (New York: Routledge).
Gagnon, J. and Simon, W. (1974), Sexual Conduct (London: Hutchinson).
Gergen, M. (1993), ‘Unbundling our Binaries — Genders, Sexualities, Desires’, in S. Wilkinson and C. Kitzinger (eds), Heterosexuality (London: Sage).
Hearn, J., Sheppard, D. L., Tancred-Sheriff, P., and Burrell, G. (1989) (eds), The Sexuality of Organization (London: Sage).
Heath, S. (1982), The Sexual Fix (London: Hutchinson).
Holland, J., Ramazanoglu, C., Scott, S., Sharpe, S. and Thomson, R. (1990), “‘Don’t Die of Ignorance’ — I Nearly Died of Embarrassment”: Condoms in Context (London: Tufnell Press).
Holland, J., Ramazanoglu, C., Scott, S., Sharpe, S. and Thomson, R. (1991), Pressure, Resistance, Empowerment: Young Women and the Negotiation of Safer Sex (London: Tufnell Press).
Holland, J., Ramazanoglu, C., Sharpe, S. and Thomson, R. (1994), ‘Power and Desire: The Embodiment of Female Sexuality’, Feminist Review, 46.
Hollibaugh, A. (1989), ‘Desire for the Future: Radical Hope in Passion and Pleasure’, in C. Vance (ed.), Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality (London: Pandora).
Hollway, W. (1984a), ‘Gender Difference and the Production of Subjectivity’, in J. Henriques, W. Hollway, C. Urwin, C. Venn and V. Walkerdine (eds), Changing the Subject (London: Methuen).
Hollway, W. (1984b), ‘Women’s Power in Heterosexual Sex’, Women’s Studies International Forum, 7 (1): pp. 63–8.
Hollway, W. (1989), Subjectivity and Method in Psychology (London: Sage).
Hollway, W. (1993), ‘Theorizing Heterosexuality: A Response’, Feminism and Psychology, 3 (3): pp. 412–17.
Jackson, M. (1987), ’“Facts of Life” or the Eroticization of Women’s Oppression? Sexology and the Social Construction of Heterosexuality’, in P. Caplan (ed.), The Cultural Construction of Sexuality (London: Tavistock).
Jackson, M. (1994), The Real Facts of Life: Feminism and the Politics of Sexuality (London: Taylor & Francis).
Jackson, S. (1978), ‘The Social Context of Rape’, Women’s Studies International Quarterly, 1 (1): pp. 27–38.
Jackson, S. (1982a), Childhood and Sexuality (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).
Jackson, S. (1982b), ‘Masculinity, Femininity and Sexuality’, in S. Friedman and E. Sarah (eds), On the Problem of Men (London: The Women’s Press).
Jackson, S. (1992), ‘The Amazing Deconstructing Woman: The Perils of Postmodern Feminism’, Trouble and Strife, 25: pp. 25–31.
Jackson, S. (1993), ‘Even Sociologists Fall in Love’, Sociology, 27 (2): pp. 201–20.
Jeffreys, S. (1985), The Spinster and her Enemies (London: Pandora).
Jeffreys, S. (1990), Anticlimax: A Feminist Critique of the Sexual Revolution (London: The Women’s Press).
Kappeler, S. (1986), The Pornography of Representation (Oxford: Polity Press).
Kelly, L. (1988), Surviving Sexual Violence (Oxford: Polity Press).
Kitzinger, C. (1994), Problematizing Pleasure: Radical Feminist Deconstructions of Sexuality and Power’, in H. L. Radtke and H. J. Stam (eds), Power/Gender: Social Relations in Theory and Practice (London: Sage).
Kitzinger, C. and Wilkinson, S. (1993), ‘Theorizing Heterosexuality’, in S. Wilkinson and C. Kitzinger (eds), Heterosexuality: A ‘Feminism and Psychology’ Reader (London: Sage).
Lees, S. (1986), Losing Out (London: Hutchinson).
MacKinnon, C. (1982), ‘Feminism, Marxism, Method and the State: An Agenda for Theory’, Signs, 7 (3): pp. 515–44.
McNay, L. (1992), Feminism and Foucault (Oxford: Polity Press).
Poovey, M. (1989), Uneven Developments (London: Virago).
Ramazanoglu, C. (ed.) (1993), Up against Foucault (London: Routledge).
Ramazanoglu, C. (1994), ‘Theorizing Heterosexuality: A Reply to Wendy Hollway’, Feminism and Psychology, 4 (2): pp. 320–1.
Ramazanoglu, C. and Holland, J. (1993), ‘Women’s Sexuality and Men’s Appropriation of Desire’, in C. Ramazanoglu (ed.), Up against Foucault (London: Routledge).
Rich, A. (1980), ‘Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence’, Signs, 5 (4): pp. 631–60.
Richardson, D. (1993), ‘Sexuality and Male Dominance’, in D. Richardson and V. Robertson (eds), Introducing Women’s Studies (London: Macmillan).
Riley, D. (1988), Am I That Name? Feminism and the Category of Women in History (London: Macmillan).
Robinson, V. (1993), ‘Heterosexuality: Beginnings and Connections’, in S. Wilkinson and C. Kitzinger (eds), Heterosexuality (London: Sage).
Rowland, R. (1993), ‘Radical Feminist Heterosexuality: The Personal and the Political’, in S. Wilkinson and C. Kitzinger (eds), Heterosexuality (London: Sage).
Rubin, G. (1975), ‘The Traffic in Women’, in R. Reiter (ed.), Toward an Anthropology of Women (New York: Monthly Review Press).
Rubin, G. (1989), ‘Thinking Sex: Notes for a Radical Theory of the Politics of Sexuality’, in C. Vance (ed.), Pleasure and Danger (London: Pandora).
Scully, D. (1990), Understanding Sexual Violence (London: Unw in Hyman).
Segal, L. (1994), Straight Sex: The Politics of Pleasure (London: Virago).
Segal, N. (1992), ‘Why Can’t a Good Man Be Sexy? Why Can’t a Sexy Man Be Good?’, in D. Porter (ed.), Between Men and Feminism (London: Routledge).
Seidman, S. (1992), Embattled Eros: Sexual Politics and Ethics in Contemporary America (New York: Routledge).
Smart, C. (1992), ‘Disruptive Bodies and Unruly Sex: the Regulation of Reproduction and Sexuality in the Nineteenth Century’, in C. Smart (ed.), Regulating Womanhood (London: Routledge).
Swindells, J. (1993), ‘A Straight Outing’, Trouble and Strife, 26: pp. 40–4.
Thomson, R. and Scott, S. (1991), Learning about Sex: Young Women and the Social Construction of Sexual Identity (London: Tufnell Press).
Walby, S. (1990), Theorizing Patriarchy (Oxford: Blackwell).
Weedon, C. (1987), Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist Theory (Oxford: Blackwell).
Westwood, S. (1984), All Day, Every Day (London: Pluto Press).
Wittig, M. (1992), The Straight Mind and Other Essays (Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf).
Young, A. (1993), ‘The Authority of the Name’, in S. Wilkinson and S. Kitzinger (eds), Heterosexuality (London: Sage).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1996 British Sociological Association
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jackson, S. (1996). Heterosexuality as a Problem for Feminist Theory. In: Adkins, L., Merchant, V. (eds) Sexualizing the Social. Explorations in Sociology.. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24549-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24549-9_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-65000-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-24549-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)