Advertisement

How (and How Not) to Design Research to Inform Policy-making

  • Ray Pawson
  • Nicholas Tilley
Part of the Explorations in Sociology book series (EIS)

Abstract

Imagine, if you will, a senior police officer or policy adviser reading the following conclusion to a review of some twenty publicly funded professional evaluations of the effectiveness of community policing experiments:

The question is, is it (community policing) more than rhetoric? There are ample examples of failed experiments, and huge American cities where the whole concept has gone awry. On the other hand, there is evidence in many evaluations that a public hungry for attention has a great deal to tell the police and are grateful for the opportunity to do so. (Skogan, 1992).

What is the likely reaction to this? What is to be made of it? What has been learnt so far? There are failed experiments and non-failed experiments. So what? Why should a series of evaluation studies be funded at the taxpayer’s expense if this is the conclusion? Is the police officer or policy adviser any wit the wiser following a series of studies ending up here?

Keywords

Police Officer Social Construction Crime Prevention Scientific Realist Policy Adviser 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bennett, T. (1989) ‘Contact Patrols in Birmingham and London: An Evaluation of a Fear Reducing Strategy’, report to the Home Office Research and Planning Unit.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, T. (1991) ‘The Effectiveness of a Police-initiated Fear-reducing Strategy’, British Journal of Criminology, 31: l, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
  3. Cook, T. D. and Campbell, D. T. (1979) Quasi-Experimentation (Chicago: Rand McNally).Google Scholar
  4. Harrè, R. (1972) The Philosophies of Science (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  5. Hope, T. and Foster, J. (1991) ‘Conflicting Forces: Changing the Dynamics of Crime and Community on a Problem Estate’, presented at the British Criminology Conference, York.Google Scholar
  6. Lakatos, I. (1978) The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Laycock, G. (1992) ‘Operation Identification, or The Power of Publicity’, in Clarke, R. (ed.), Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies (New York: Harrow and Heston), pp. 230–8.Google Scholar
  8. Maxfield, M. (1987) Explaining Fear of Crime: Evidence from the 1984 British Crime Survey, Research and Planning Unit Paper 34 (London: Home Office).Google Scholar
  9. Pawson, R. (1989) A Measure for Measures: A Manifesto for an Empirical Sociology (London: Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Pawson, R. and Tilley, N. (1992) ‘Re-evaluation: Rethinking Research on Corrections and Crime’, Yearbook of Correctional Education, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
  11. Skogan, W. (1992) ‘Community Policing in the United States’, presented at the Paris Crime Reduction Conference.Google Scholar
  12. Tilley, N. (1993) Understanding Car Parks, Crime and CCTV: Evaluation Lessons from Safer Cities, Crime Prevention Unit Paper 42 (London: Home Office).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© British Sociological Association 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ray Pawson
  • Nicholas Tilley

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations