Advertisement

Encouraging Voices: Towards More Creative Methods for Collecting Data on Gender and Household Labour

  • Andrea Doucet
Part of the Explorations in Sociology book series (EIS)

Abstract

For more than two decades, authors from many disciplinary perspectives have charted and documented the work and parenting lives of women and men in Europe and North America and have left an indisputable trail of evidence to confirm that, in spite of women’s increasing labour market participation, women continue to take on most of the household’s work.2 Perhaps the most surprisingly consistent finding relates to the limited change that has occurred with regard to household responsibility: women continue to be the managers, planners, organisers and supervisors of housework and childcare-related activities in the home. Indeed, even in Sweden and Denmark with their very favourable and highly praised work-family policies (Melhuish and Moss, 1991), Scandinavian writers have recently pointed to the ‘remarkable’ persistence of gender divisions of labour in care-giving work (Leira, 1990) and to the fact that ‘the responsibility for children still overwhelmingly lies with mothers’ (Borchorst, 1990, p. 176).

Keywords

Gender Equality Gender Relation Household Labour Household Work Household Task 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Backett, K. C. (1982), Mothers and Fathers: A Study of the Development and Negotiation of Parental Behaviour (London and Basingstoke: Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berk, S. F. (1985), The Gender Factory: The Apportionment of Work in American Households (New York: Plenum).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bird, G. W., Bird, G. A. and Scruggs, M. (1984), ‘Determinants of Family Task Sharing: A Study of Husbands and Wives’, Journal of Marriage and the Family, May 1984: pp. 345–55.Google Scholar
  4. Borchorst, A. (1990), ‘Political Motherhood and Childcare Policies: A Comparative Approach to Britain and Scandinavia’, in Ungerson, C. (ed.), Gender and Caring: Work and Welfare in Britain and Scandinavia (London: Harvester Wheatsheaf).Google Scholar
  5. Boulton, M. G. (1983), On Being A Mother (London: Tavistock).Google Scholar
  6. Brannen, J. and Moss, P. (1991), Managing Mothers: Dual Earner Households After Maternity Leave (London: Unw in Hyman).Google Scholar
  7. Brown, L. M. and Gilligan, C. (1992), Meeting at the Crossroads: Women’s Psychology and Girl’s Development (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crouter, A. (1984), ‘Spillover from Family to Work: the Neglected Side of the Work—Family Interface’, Human Relations, vol. 37, pp. 425–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DeVault, M. (1991), Feeding the Family: The Social Organization of Caring as Gendered Work (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  10. Di Leonardo, M. (1987), ‘The Female World of Cards and Holidays: Women, Families, and the World of Kinship’, Signs, 12: pp. 440–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Doucet, A. (1992), ‘What Difference does Difference Make? Towards an Understanding of Gender Equality and Difference in the Household Division of Labour’, in Dunne, G. A., Blackburn, R. M. and Jarman, J. (eds), Inequalities in Employment, Inequalities in Home-Life: Conference Proceedings for the 20th Cambridge Social Stratification Seminar (Cambridge: Sociological Research Group, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Cambridge).Google Scholar
  12. Doucet, A. (1995), ‘Gender Differences, Gender Equality and Care: Towards Understanding Gendered Labour in British Dual Earner Households’, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  13. Doucet, A. (1995), ‘Gender Differences, Gender Equality and Gender Differences within Household Work and Parenting’, Women’s Studies International Forum, vol. 18.Google Scholar
  14. Ehrensaft, D. (1987), Parenting Together: Men and Women Sharing the Care of their Children (London: Collier Macmillan).Google Scholar
  15. Evetts, J. (1988), ‘Managing Childcare and Work Responsibilities: The Strategies of Married Women: Primary and Infant Teachers’, The Sociological Review, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 503–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Finch, J. and Mason, J. (1993), Negotiating Family Responsibilities (London: Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gershuny, J. I., Miles, I., Jones, S., Mullins, C., Thomas, G. and Wyatt, S. M. E. (1986), ‘Preliminary Analysis of the 1983/4 ESRC Time-Budget Data’, Quarterly Journal of Social Affairs, vol. 2, pp. 13–39.Google Scholar
  18. Graham, H. (1983), ‘Caring: A Labour of Love,’ in Finch, J. and Groves, D. (eds) A Labour of Love: Women, Work and Caring (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
  19. Hochschild, A. (1989), The Second Shift (New York: Avon Books).Google Scholar
  20. Jowell, R., Witherspoon, S. and Brook, L. (eds) (1988), British Social Attitudes: The Fifth Report (Hants: Gower).Google Scholar
  21. Kimball, G. (1988), 50/50 Parenting: Sharing Family Rewards and Responsibilities (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books).Google Scholar
  22. Leira, A. (1990), ‘Coping with Care: Mothers in a Welfare State’, in Ungerson, C. (ed.), Gender and Caring: Work and Welfare in Britain and Scandinavia (London: Harvester Wheatsheaf).Google Scholar
  23. Martin, B. (1984), “’Mother Wouldn’t Like it!” Housework as Magic’, Theory, Culture and Society, 2: pp. 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mauthner, N. (1994), ‘Postnatal Depression: A Relational Perspective’, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  25. Meissner, M., Humphreys, S. M., Meis, M. and Scheu, W.J. (1975), ‘No Exit For Wives: Sexual Division of Labour and the Cumulation of Household Demands’, Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 424–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Melhuish, E. C. and Moss, P. (eds) (1991), Day Care for Young Children: International Perspectives (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
  27. Morris, L. (1985), ‘Renegotiation of the Domestic Division of Labour’ in Roberts, B. et al. (eds), New Approaches to Economic Life (Manchester: Manchester University Press).Google Scholar
  28. Morrow, V. (1992), ‘Family Values: Accounting for Children’s Contribution to the Domestic Economy’, Working Paper Series, Working Paper No. 10 (Cambridge: Sociological Research Group, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Cambridge).Google Scholar
  29. Oakley, A. (1974), Housewife (London: Allen Lane).Google Scholar
  30. Pahl, R. E. (1984), Divisions of Labour (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
  31. Pleck, J. H. (1985), Working Wives, Working Husbands (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage).Google Scholar
  32. Reason, P. and Rowan, J. (eds) (1981), Human Inquiry: A Sourcebook for New Paradigm Research (Chichester: John Wiley).Google Scholar
  33. Rhode, D. L. (1989), Justice and Gender: Sex Discrimination and the Law (London: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  34. Rhode, D. L. (ed.) (1990), Theoretical Perspectives on Sexual Difference (London: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
  35. Sharma, U. (1986), Women’s Work: Class and the Urban Household: A Study of Shimla, North India (London: Tavistock).Google Scholar
  36. Solberg, A. (1988), ‘The Everyday Life of Norwegian Children’, paper presented to the Third International Workshop, The Ethnography of Childhood, Cambridge, 3–6 July, 1988.Google Scholar
  37. Srinivasan, L. (1977), Perspectives on Non formal Adult Learning (Boston, MA.: World Education).Google Scholar
  38. Srinivasan, L. (1990), Tools for Community Participation: A Manual for Training Trainers in Participatory Techniques (New York: PROWWESS/United Nations Development Programme).Google Scholar
  39. Thoits, P. A. (1987), ‘Negotiating Roles’, in Crosby, F. J. (ed.), Spouse, Parent, Worker: On Gender and Multiple Roles (New Haven CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
  40. Thompson, L. and Walker, A. J. (1989), ‘Gender in Families: Women and Men in Marriage, Work, and Parenthood’, Journal of Marriage and the Family, vol. 51, pp. 845–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tronto, J. (1989), ‘Women and Caring: What Can Feminists Learn about Morality from Caring?’, in Jaggar, A. M. and Bordo, S. R.(eds), Gender/Body/Knowledge: Feminist Reconstructions of Being and Knowing (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press).Google Scholar
  42. Tronto, J. (1993), Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© British Sociological Association 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrea Doucet

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations