National Security, Narcotics Control and the Haitian Military

  • Michel S. Laguerre
Part of the International Political Economy Series book series (IPES)


National security has always been a fundamental factor that shapes the behaviour of the Haitian government. It is so for three major reasons: (1) the constitution prescribes that the president upholds the national integrity of the territory; (2) both internal and external security are the foundation for the stability and maintenance of the central government; and (3) because of the historical circumstances in which the country gained its independence - that is, through a revolution fought by slaves. This explains why one had to wait until 1918 - during the occupation by the United States - before a foreigner could legally be allowed to own land in Haiti. Until then, there was a clause in all of the various constitutions of the nineteenth century that forbade this from happening.


National Security Dominican Republic Drug Trafficking Drug Dealer Coast Guard 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ibid., p. 6: and Thomas V. Cash, Drug Trafficking in Haiti (Miami: Drug Enforcement Administration, Miami Field Division, 1989), p. 21Google Scholar
  2. ’Agreement between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Haiti for the interdiction of narcotics trafficking’, in United States Treaties and Other International Agreements, vol. 4, Part 4, 1981–82 (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1988), p. 71.Google Scholar
  3. ’Statement of Thomas V. Cash’, Special Agent in Charge, Miami Field Division, Drug Enforcement Administration, in Drugs, Law Enforcement and Foreign Policy: The Cartel, Haiti and Central America, Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Terrorism, Narcotics and International Operations of the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, OneGoogle Scholar
  4. Hundredth Congress, Second Session, Part 4 (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1989), pp. 5–19.Google Scholar
  5. ’Letter from Mario Jehan Heraux to Congressman Walter E. Fauntroy’, 25 March 1988, in House of Representatives, US Foreign Policy and Narcotics Control, Part II, Hearing before the Select Committee on Narcotics Abuse and Control, One Hundredth Congress, Second Session (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1988), p. 124.Google Scholar
  6. US Department of State, International Narcotics Control Strategy Report (Washington, DC: Bureau of International Narcotics Matters, 1993), p. 194.Google Scholar
  7. ’Statement of John C. Lawn, Administrator, Drug Enforcement Administration’, in US Foreign Policy and International Narcotics Control, Part II, US House of Representatives, Hearing before the Select Committee on Narcotics Abuse and Control concerning Drug Enforcement Activities in Panama, Nicaragua, Honduras, Mexico, Haiti and the Bahamas (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1988), p. 135.Google Scholar
  8. FBIS, Region Latin America, Civilian, 2 Soldiers Arrested for Cocaine Smuggling, 3 March 1993, p. 4.Google Scholar
  9. FBIS, Region Latin America, Aristide Says Army Lives on Drugs, 13 May 1993, p. 3.Google Scholar
  10. ’Drug flow through Haiti sharply cut by embargo5, New York Times, 4 Nov. 1994, p. A6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michel S. Laguerre

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations