Skip to main content

‘An arm clothed in white samite’: Twentieth-Century Women Writers and the Arthurian Legends (Mary Stewart, Marion Zimmer Bradley and Jane Yolen)

  • Chapter
Women and Arthurian Literature
  • 63 Accesses

Abstract

Mary Stewart’s Arthurian novels, which consist of the Merlin Trilogy (The Crystal Cave, 1970; The Hollow Hills, 1973; and The Last Enchantment, 1979) and a book on Mordred. The Wicked Day, 1993, are some of the most popular twentieth-century versions of the legends.1 Her combination of a traditional idealisation, a detailed and seemingly accurate historical setting, and a vivid form of characterisation have made the books international bestsellers as well as providing suitable material for a television series.2 As such Mary Stewart is one of the most important women writers to address herself to the stories of Arthur, and she certainly deserves to be considered in this final chapter; but it would be a mistake to cast her as a ‘feminist’ author. Indeed, the first novel was composed in the 1960s before late twentieth-century feminism, either in its political or critical sense, became a recognised concept. Neither does she talk from a woman’s point of view or even concentrate upon the female figures of the legends, as, for example, Lady Charlotte Guest had done. Instead, Stewart focuses on the first person narrative of Merlin, Arthur’s magician, and makes no question about the anti-hero status of her narrator, asserting his unconventional role in the Prologue to The Crystal Cave: ‘I am an old man now ... This is what happened ... I saw it, and it is a true tale’ (CC, pp. 11–12).3 Moreover, in addition to the basic lack of appeal with which she introduces Merlin, the magician’s inheritance from the traditional myth has him as the least sympathetic to women of all the Arthurian characters. Unlike the knights who vow to serve their ladies, the ideal Lancelot or the courtly Gawain, Merlin is notorious for avoiding or disparaging women, and he is punished for this by being trapped into a living-death by the Lady of the Lake’s magic spells (Stewart reworks this part of the tale in The Last Enchantment). Merlin is, therefore, a somewhat strange figure for a woman novelist to adopt as her primary narrator, but Stewart’s choice is surprisingly successful since, although Merlin might be depicted as misogynistic and/or nervous of women, he is at the same time always cast as an outsider. The autobiographical voice within The Crystal Cave situates itself on the margins of Arthur’s court and the male value systems of battle and bravado. In this Merlin reflects Stewart whose authorial voice must, by virtue of its female gender, necessarily be excluded from the predominantly male authorial versions of the Arthurian myth. However, I intend to return to the question of the gendered voice at the end of this section and, at present, concentrate on the gradual development of Merlin’s character and his function within the text’s thematic allegiances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Mary Stewart, The Crystal Cave (London, 1991); The Hollow Hills (London, 1974); The Last Enchantment (London, 1992); The Wicked Day (London, 1993). All future references to these texts will be made parenthetically. Stewart’s Arthurian works are also the most taught versions; see Maureen Fries, ‘Trends in the Modern Arthurian novel’, in Valerie M. Lagorio and Mildred Leake Day (eds.). King Arthur Through the Ages (London, 1990), Vol. II, pp. 207–22; p. 218.

    Google Scholar 

  2. The Crystal Cave was turned into a BBC television series.

    Google Scholar 

  3. For a discussion of Merlin’s role as antihero and for the magician’s association with the authorial voice see Thomas Hoburg, ‘A Whistle For the Wind: Mary Stewart’s Merlin’, Avalon to Camelot, II (1987), pp. 17–19.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beverly Taylor and Elizabeth Brewer, The Return of King Arthur: British and American Arthurian Literature since 1900 (Cambridge, 1983), p. 303.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Charles Moorman, ‘ “Yet Some Men Say ... that Kynge Arthure Ys Nat Ded”’, in Mary F. Baswell and John Bugge (eds.). The Arthurian Tradition in Convergence (Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 1988), pp. 188–99.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Marion Zimmer Bradley, The Mists of Avalon (London, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  7. John Cowper Powys, A Glastonbury Romance, (London, 1933), and Mary J. Jones, Avalon (Tallahassee, Florida, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jane Yolen, Merlin’s Booke (Minneapolis, 1986) and ‘Dream Weaver: An Interview With Jane Yolen’, Avalon to Camelot, II (1987), p. 20–3.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bradley, Mists of Avalon, p. 843. All future references to this text will be made parenthetically.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eugene Vinaver (ed.) Malory: Works (Oxford, 1971), pp. 81–93.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fries, Trends in the Modern Arthurian Novel’, p. 220. See also Mildred Day Leake, ‘The Mists of Avalon’, Avalon to Camelot, I (1983), p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Janet Todd, Feminist Literary History (Cambridge, 1988), pp. 17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  13. For example: Diana Fuss, Essentially Speaking: Feminism, Nature and Difference (London, 1989) and Donna Landry and Gerald MacLean, Materialist Feminisms (Oxford, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Todd, Feminist Literary History, pp. 17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fries, however, finds such allusions inappropriate to a retelling of the Arthurian narrative: ‘there is a trendiness in some of its details which may not wear well — Gwenhwyfar is afflicted with agoraphobia and hot flashes, for instance, and participates in a sexual threesome with Arthur and Lancelot, and Morgaine agonizes over an abortion’ (Trends in the Modern Arthurian Novel’, p. 221). For a discussion on the desire of critics for unadulterated Arthuriana see above Chapter 6, pp. 131–2.

    Google Scholar 

  16. One of the problematic shifts in Bradley’s ideological position occurs through the different ways she treats female and male homosexuality; while the former is fully accepted as a further consummation of female solidarity, the latter is regarded with distaste as something which excludes women. In the novel, Lancelot confides in Morgaine about a night when he, Arthur and Guinevere had sex together: ‘But you do not know all,’ he whispered. ‘As we lay together — never, never had anything so — so’ He swallowed and fumbled to put into words what Morgaine could not bear to hear. ‘I — I touched Arthur — I touched him. I love her, oh God, I love her, mistake me not, but had she not been Arthur’s wife, had it not been for — I doubt even she —’ He choked and could not finish his sentence, while Morgaine stood utterly still, appalled beyond speech. (p. 556)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Leake, ‘The Mists of Avalon’, p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bradley is indebted to Dion Fortune’s Avalon of the Heart (London, 1934). For a discussion of Bradley’s use of the Goddess see John Giannini, ‘Merlin and Morgaine’, Avalon to Camelot, II (1983), pp. 15–17.

    Google Scholar 

  19. For other passages see pp. 124–9, 157–8, 265–7, 470–1, 578–83, 652–7, 678–81, 864–74, and 996–1000.

    Google Scholar 

  20. ‘Dream Weaver’, pp. 20–3.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Barbara G. Walker, The Woman’s Encyclopedia of Myths and Secrets (San Francisco, 1983), p. 636.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ibid, p. 641.

    Google Scholar 

  23. ‘Dream Weaver’, p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yolen has commented upon her belief in the oral tradition in ‘Dream Weaver’, p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  25. L. Pearce, Reading Dialogics (London, 1994), p. 175.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1996 Marion Wynne-Davies

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wynne-Davies, M. (1996). ‘An arm clothed in white samite’: Twentieth-Century Women Writers and the Arthurian Legends (Mary Stewart, Marion Zimmer Bradley and Jane Yolen). In: Women and Arthurian Literature. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24453-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics