Warfare in the Third Dimension: Air Power in Perspective



Aristotle once remarked how many a dispute could have been deflated into a single paragraph if the disputants had just dared to define their terms. Yet defining what the term ‘air power’ should and should not encompass has always proved difficult and often highly contentious.


Military Force Land Force Strategic Bombing Combat Aircraft Military Aviation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 8.
    Jury, A.R., ‘Aircraft Battle Damage Repair — An Effective Force Multiplier’, in unpublished MOD Journal, vol. 46, November 1992, p. 413.Google Scholar
  2. 14.
    Slessor, Sir John, ‘The Past Development of Air Power’, Journal of the Royal United Services Institute, 1949, p. 224.Google Scholar
  3. 25.
    See for example Roos, John G., ‘Sweden’s $800-Million Armor Prize will not be Won by a Snow Job’, in Armed Forces Journal International May 1992, p. 22, which quotes the cost of 200 tanks at $800 million.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Andrew G. B. Vallance 1996

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations