Skip to main content

Re(-)fusing the Sign: Linguistic Ambiguity and the Subversion of Patriarchy in Romeo and Juliet and The Two Gentlemen of Verona

  • Chapter
  • 59 Accesses

Abstract

Thus begins Terence Hawkes’s irreverent and incisive book, one of the first examinations of the cultural construction of the Shakespearean canon, That Shakespeherian Rag — a title adroitly culled from the name of a twenties jazz song that appears in Eliot’s The Waste Land. 2 Towards the end of his book, Hawkes draws a parallel between the activities of the poststructuralist critic and the jazz musician:

what I propose [is] the sense of a text as a site, or an area of conflicting and often contradictory potential interpretations, no one or group of which can claim ‘intrinsic’ primacy or ‘inherent’ authority …

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Terence Hawkes, That Shakespeherian Rag: Essays on a Critical Process (1986), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Robert Greene, A Groats-worth of Witte bought with a Million of Repentance (Westport, Conn., 1970), pp. 45–6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Terry Eagleton, William Shakespeare (Oxford, 1986), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cited by Keir Elam, Shakespeare’s Universe of Discourse: Language Games in the Comedies (Cambridge, 1984), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jonathan Dollimore, Sexual Dissidence (Oxford, 1991), p. 285.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Geoffrey Hughes, Swearing: A Social History of Foul Language, Oaths and Profanity in English (Oxford, 1991), p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Julia Kristeva, ‘Romeo and Juliet: Love-hatred in the couple’, in Shakespearean Tragedy, ed. John Drakakis (1992), 296–315, p. 305.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ruth Nevo, Comic Transformations in Shakespeare (1980), p. 56.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1995 Peter J. Smith

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, P.J. (1995). Re(-)fusing the Sign: Linguistic Ambiguity and the Subversion of Patriarchy in Romeo and Juliet and The Two Gentlemen of Verona . In: Social Shakespeare. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24225-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics