Advertisement

The Illusion of Reference

  • Raymond Tallis
Part of the Language, Discourse, Society book series (LDS)

Abstract

No one, I think, would wish to challenge the obvious truth that language is implicated in the construction of reality. The question that I wish to address in this section, however, is the extent to which reality is intra-linguistic and language is the agent or medium in virtue of which reality is structured or constituted. More particularly, I shall question the radically nominalist assumption, common to many post-Saussurean critics, that the traffic is all one way: that language structures reality but reality does not influence the structure, the system of differences, that is language. And, more specifically still, the claim that such radical nominalism is licensed by the ideas put forward by Saussure.

Keywords

Literary Theory Radical Nominalism Death Sentence External Reality Colour Term 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Robert Scholes, The Fictional Criticism of the Future’, TriQuarterly, vol. 34 (Fall 1975).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Catherine Belsey, Critical Practice (London: Methuen, 1980) p. 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    John B. Carroll (ed.), Language, Thought and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1956) p. 213.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    For a marvellously suggestive and wide-ranging exploration of the implications of the idea that ‘the universe’ is itself an idea, see Paul Valéry’s essay ‘On Poe’s “Eureka”’, available in Leonardo, Poe, Mallarmé, trans. Malcolm Cowley and James R. Lawler, vol. 8 of The Collected Works of Paul Valéry (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1972).Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    See Elizabeth Anscombe, ‘The Intentionality of Sensation: a Grammatical Feature’, in R. J. Butler (ed.), Analytical Philosophy, Second Series (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1965).Google Scholar
  6. 8.
    Geoffrey Leech, Semantics (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1974) p. 29.Google Scholar
  7. 9.
    B. Berlin and P. Kay, Basic Color Terms (Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1969).Google Scholar
  8. 10.
    Jonathan Culler, Structuralist Poetics (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1975) p. 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 14.
    Ferdinand de Saussure, Course in General Linguistics, trans. Wade Baskin (London: Fontana; Glasgow: Collins, 1974) pp. 111–12.Google Scholar
  10. 15.
    See, for example, P. Lieberman, ‘On the acoustic basis of the perception of intonation by linguists’, Word, vol. 21 (1965) pp. 40–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 16.
    Jacques Lacan, Ecrits, selected and trans. Alan Sheridan (London: Tavistock, 1977) p. 65.Google Scholar
  12. 19.
    John Passmore, Philosophical Reasoning (London: Duckworth, 1961)Google Scholar
  13. 21.
    Jacqueline Rose, The Imaginary’, in Colin MacCabe (ed.), The Talking Cure (London: Macmillan, 1981) p. 137.Google Scholar
  14. 22.
    Roland Barthes, The Pleasure of the Text, trans. Richard Miller (New York: Mill & Wang, 1975) p. 62.Google Scholar
  15. 24.
    Terry Eagleton, Literary Theory (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1983) p. 108.Google Scholar
  16. 26.
    Terence Hawkes, Structuralism and Semiotics (London: Methuen, 1977) pp. 16–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 27.
    Roland Barthes, Writing Degree Zero, trans. Annette Lavers and Colin Smith (London: Jonathan Cape, 1967) p. 68.Google Scholar
  18. 30.
    For a lucid account of the arguments and the structuralist and post-structuralist use that has been made of them, Jonathan Culler’s Saussure (London: Fontana, Modern Masters, 1982)Google Scholar
  19. 34.
    For an excellent discussion of this distinction see John Lyons’s Semantics (Cambridge University Press, 1977) vol. I, section 1.2, pp. 5–10.Google Scholar
  20. Jonathan Culler, On Deconstruction (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1983) pp. 115–20Google Scholar
  21. 38.
    L. Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, trans. D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1961).Google Scholar
  22. 39.
    See, for example, D. H. Hubel and T. N. Wiesel, Terrier Lecture: Functional Architecture of Macaque Monkey Cortex’, Proceedings of the Royal Society B vol. 198 (1977) pp. 1–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. C. G. Philips, S. Zeki and H. B. Barlow, ‘Localisation of Function in the Cerebral Cortex: Past, Present and Future’, Brain vol. 208 (1984) pp. 328–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 42.
    Quoted in Manfred Bierwisch, ‘Semantics’, in J. Lyons (ed.), New Horizons in Linguistics (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1970) p. 171.Google Scholar
  25. 44.
    Roland Barthes, The Elements of Semiology, trans. Colin Smith and Annette Lavers (London: Jonathan Cape, 1964) p. 57.Google Scholar
  26. Edmund Leach, Lévi-Strauss (London: Fontana, Modern Masters, 1970) p. 32.Google Scholar
  27. 50.
    Robert Scholes, ‘The Fictional Criticism of the Future’, TriQuarterly, vol. 34 (Fall 1975).Google Scholar
  28. 51.
    Gottlob Frege, ‘On Sense and Reference’, in Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, 2nd edn, and trans. P. Geach and M. Black (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1960).Google Scholar
  29. 53.
    I owe this way of putting it to Michael Dummett, Frege: Philosophy of Language (London: Duckworth, 1973).Google Scholar
  30. 55.
    Quoted in Norman Malcolm’s Ludwig Wittgenstein: A Memoir (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1959).Google Scholar
  31. 58.
    Quoted by Jonathan Culler in Barthes (London: Fontana, Modern Masters; Glasgow: Collins, 1983).Google Scholar
  32. 62.
    Jacques Derrida, Of Grammatology, trans. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976) p. 50.Google Scholar
  33. 68.
    Roland Barthes, S/Z, trans. Richard Miller (New York, Hill & Wang, 1974) p. 40.Google Scholar
  34. 76.
    Roland Barthes, Mythologies, trans. Annette Lavers (London: Jonathan Cape, 1972) p. 113.Google Scholar
  35. 80.
    Emile Benveniste, Problems in General Linguistics, trans. Mary Elizabeth Meek, Miami Linguistics series No. 8 (Coral Gable, Flor.: University of Miami Press, 1971).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Raymond Tallis 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raymond Tallis

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations