Thatcher’s Legacy: The Americanisation of British Politics?
Political marketing is now clearly woven into the fabric of British politics. It has been adopted by right and left of the spectrum, trade unions, pressure groups and charities. Thatcher’s Conservative Party led the way with the hiring of Saatchi & Saatchi in 1978 and the incorporation of marketing expertise at high levels of influence in the party organisation. By the late 1980s Labour had become the new marketing leaders, Peter Mandelson its driving force and the red rose its clearest symbol. Where once the Labour leaders had reacted with alarm and contumely to the ‘marketing of Margaret’, by the early 1990s the tables had turned. The Tories accused Labour of reducing politics to slick and phoney images, John Major renounced the image-makers and Harvey Thomas parted company with Conservative Central Office (CCO) complaining that the party was neglecting fundamentals of communications.
KeywordsDirect Mail Marketing Concept Campaign Spending Electoral Credibility Political Advertising
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.André Malraux, Antimémoires (1967), i. 122.Google Scholar
- 2.Donald Regan tells the bizarre story that Deaver organised the president’s schedule only after consultation with Nancy Reagan and the First Lady’s ‘friend’, a San Francisco astrologer. See Donald T. Regan, For the Record (1988) pp. 73–5.Google Scholar
- 6.Ralph Harris and Arthur Seldon, in a publication by the right-wing Institute of Economic Affairs, argued that Mrs Thatcher’s reluctance to tackle the NHS resulted from ‘ill-considered advice based on defective measurement of public opinion’: Ralph Harris and Arthur Seldon, Welfare without the State (1987).Google Scholar
- 7.See Michael Biddiss, ‘Thatcherism: Concept and Interpretations’, in K. Minogue and M. Biddis (eds), Thatcherism (1987).Google Scholar
- 8.Bernard Ingham, Kill The Messenger (1991) p. 352.Google Scholar
- 10.Patrick Cosgrave, The Lives of Enoch Powell (1989) p. 17.Google Scholar
- 11.The only criticism of the government at the 1986 conference concerned, ironically enough, the presentation of government policy. There was no objection to government policies from any of the floor speakers. See Richard Kelly, Conservative Party Conferences (1989) p. 155.Google Scholar
- 14.Peter Mandelson, ‘Marketing Labour’, Contemporary Record, Winter 1988 1(4).Google Scholar
- 21.Quoted in Robert Waller, Moulding Political Opinion (1988) p. 106.Google Scholar
- 24.See Patrick Seyd and Paul Whitely, Labour’s Grass Roots (1992) pp. 207–11.Google Scholar
- 26.See Larry M. Bartels, ‘The Impact of Electioneering in the United States’, in David Butler and Austin Ranney (eds), Electioneering: A Comparative Study of Continuity and Change (1992).Google Scholar
- 28.Table 8.3 is derived from Keith Ewing, Funding of Political Parties in Britain (1987) p. 90;Google Scholar
- Michael Pinto-Duschinsky, ‘Funding the British General Election of 1987’, in Crewe and Harrop (eds), Political Communication: The General Election Campaign of 1987 (1989).Google Scholar
- 29.Tariq Ali, ‘The British Clinton’, New Statesman and Society, 20 May 1994.Google Scholar
- 31.See Gerald L. Curtis, ‘Japan’ in Butler and Ranney (eds), op. cit. (1992).Google Scholar
- 35.Bill Carter, ‘Perot gave networks a race at any rate’, New York Times, 3 November 1992.Google Scholar
- 38.For an argument in favour of paid political advertising see M. Scammell, ‘Political Advertising and the Broadcasting Revolution’, in Political Quarterly, April 1990, 61(2).Google Scholar